Proceeding contribution from Sarah Pochin (Reform UK) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 1 July 2026. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Packaging Manufacturers: Extended Producer Responsibility.
Packaging Manufacturers: Extended Producer Responsibility
In my constituency, I also have a phenomenal glass manufacturer, called Encirc. It has three sites across the UK, employing over 2,000 people. It is unfairly penalised by this tax, because it is about weight. As the hon. Lady has pointed out, this is encouraging manufacturers of things like tonic to switch to aluminium and plastic, which are infinitely less recyclable than glass. It is also competing against imports from countries like Turkey, so not only are we facing the increased carbon emissions from shipping over the glass, but the glass is less pure and is therefore not as recyclable. I would ask the Minister urgently to look at this tax—I have already asked for that—and very quickly to bring in a 75% reduction while she considers its overall implications.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 788 c979
- Session
- 2026-27
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Costs Fees and charges Liability Imports Glass Manufacturing industries Recycling Packaging Standards Industrial waste Plastics Hospitality industry
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-07-02 08:58:59 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-07-01/26070172000522
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-07-01/26070172000522
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-07-01/26070172000522