Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lansley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 September 2026. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Railways Bill.


Railways Bill

That just begs the question of why in Clause 70—perhaps we can discuss it before we arrive at that point—Great British Railways has been taken out of the definition of being an infrastructure manager for the purposes of access rights under the 2000 regulations.

While I have the Committee’s attention for a moment, my noble friend was asking what functions Great British Railways can undertake. The clause makes it clear that the statutory functions are distinct from those things that Great British Railways can do as a company. Some of the things that we are discussing, such as property development, are things that it is doing as a company. However, we have to bear in mind, and the

Minister will tell me if I am wrong about this, that we go on to hear about the Secretary of State giving directions and guidance to Great British Railways. That is in relation to its statutory functions, so, by definition, it will not extend to the actions that GBR undertakes as a company. We need to be aware that there is that territory called being a company, which is outside the scope of the Secretary of State’s directions and guidance.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
859 cc232-3GC 
Session
2026-27
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Conditions of employment Compensation Codes of practice Accountability Competition Fees and charges Functions Private sector Facilities Ministerial powers Railways Railway network Passengers Standards Wales Regulation Scotland Subsidies Tickets Great British Railways Office of Rail and Road
Legislation
Railways Bill 2024-26 to 2026-27
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk