Proceeding contribution from Lord Palmer of Childs Hill (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 15 October 2025. It occurred during Debate on bill on Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill.
Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill
My Lords, clearly, it would be best if something such as who these investigators are was in the Bill so that we have more detail. What we are being offered by these amendments is to require the Minister to outline in statutory guidance the process for appointing authorised investigators. This is by no means as good as having it in the Bill, but I believe that statutory guidance has to be carefully considered, because who is appointed to investigate should be decided not just with a flick of a pen but with more careful consideration. We on these Benches are broadly supportive of this amendment, because we believe it would add additional transparency to the appointment process.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 849 c301
- Session
- 2024-26
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Criminal investigation Debts Costs Bank services Banks Deductions Department for Work and Pensions Fraud Enforcement Financial institutions Overpayments Powers Public sector Public Sector Fraud Authority Social security benefits Repayments Reviews Risk management Information sharing
- Legislation
- Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill 2024-26
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-10-28 17:12:17 +0000
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2025-10-15/25101538000064
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2025-10-15/25101538000064
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2025-10-15/25101538000064