Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lansley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 April 2021. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Security and Investment Bill.


National Security and Investment Bill

I can be brief. I acknowledge with thanks that the Minister has brought forward government amendments that respond both to my Amendment 81 in Committee, about the number of orders varied or revoked and, in part, to what the noble Lord, Lord Grantchester, had to say on Amendment 80 in Committee, including on the time taken to decide whether to accept or reject mandatory and voluntary notifications. I will not rehearse what my noble friend Lady Noakes had to say. Knowing more about the time taken, in addition to what is already intended to be in the annual report, will certainly give us reassurance about these administrative processes, which I think will be very important—especially at the outset, bearing in mind that we start with already potentially five months’ worth of relevant transactions that are within the scope of the regime but the legislation has not yet entered into force. Operating rapidly in relation to all those potential notifiable transactions will be really important, even in the first annual report.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
811 c1506 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Companies Assets Climate change Annual reports Biodiversity Export controls Government assistance Higher education Intelligence and Security Committee Ministerial powers National security Parliamentary scrutiny Loans Shares Research Takeovers Foreign investment in UK Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee Investment Security Unit
Legislation
National Security and Investment Bill 2019-21
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk