Proceeding contribution from Lord Lennie (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 June 2020. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill.
Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill
My Lords, I had rather thought that the Minister would speak at the beginning of this debate, as that might have obviated some of the discussion that we have had to have; he has not yet fulfilled what the Report stage amendments will be, based on the letter that he produced last night. There seem to be shared concerns among all speakers about the relative position of debt—finance debt, pension debt—and the weakness of the PPF. Does it or does it not have a seat on the discussion body? Would that be at the beginning of the discussions or, as someone put it, just a cc or copying in of the PPF into the information? Will the risk of gaming through acceleration of a company into insolvency by those who seek to gain from that position be guarded against? And so on.
At this stage, we should at least thank the Minister for his reconsideration in advance of signalling that there will be moves at Report stage. Whether they will be sufficient moves we will have to wait and see. This may not be the last word on these matters, but it may go some way towards putting in place a sensible, if not ideal, position for the PPF and the defined benefit pension scheme trustees, in the event of insolvency moratorium or restructuring plans. It is not yet clear how far he is prepared to go and it is a complex issue, as we have heard from all the speakers.
Secondly, I want to express my huge appreciation and admiration for the noble Baronesses, Lady Drake and Lady Warwick, from the Labour Benches, assisted by the noble Baroness, Lady Altmann, and the noble Lord, Lord Balfe, from the Conservatives, in their pursuit of this matter. It is hugely important to everyone that we get this right. The 2004 protection fund legislation was profound, important and lasting. It should not be
put at risk by what we are attempting to do in response to the Covid crisis, whether on a temporary or permanent basis. They deserve our thanks and praise for the thorough way in which they have conducted themselves. There is much more to come but, for now, we will have to await the amendments and judge on Report whether those intentions have been fulfilled.
Finally, I urge the Minister in the meantime to take up the offer of discussions made by the noble Baronesses, Lady Drake and Lady Warwick, in advance of Report stage, to see if they can iron out any creases that there may be in what he may propose.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 803 cc2124-5
- Session
- 2019-21
- Procedure
- Virtual contributions
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Charities Audit Company liquidations Companies Directors Administration Assets Debts Corporation tax Collective bargaining Delegated legislation Conflict of interests Equality Liability Financial institutions Insolvency Insolvency Service Industrial democracy Ministerial powers Northern Ireland Pay Public consultation Money laundering Parliamentary scrutiny Monitoring Staff Pension funds Pension Protection Fund Meetings Statistics Small businesses Reform Trade unions VAT Shareholders Social enterprises Revenue and Customs Companies House Henry VIII clauses Financial Reporting Council Company voluntary arrangements Small Business Commissioner Coronavirus Social distancing Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill 2019-21
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-27 20:32:16 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-06-16/20061658000007
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-06-16/20061658000007
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2020-06-16/20061658000007