Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Duke of Montrose (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 21 January 2020. It occurred during Debate on bill on European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill.


European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill

My Lords, I try to follow all the arguments that are put forward about devolution and where it all stands. The puzzle to me is that the logic of the people supporting this amendment seems to be that the Parliament here at Westminster is not entirely sovereign. That may be an issue that we wish to take up at some point in the future, but it is not something that we should be dealing with in the withdrawal Bill. I am not a lawyer, but the way the amendment is phrased seems to make justiciable anything that comes up between the devolved Administrations and Westminster. At this point, I think I would oppose the amendment on the ground that it would detract from the sovereignty of Westminster without all the implications having been thought through.

4.30 pm


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
801 c1071 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Devolved matters Courts Asylum Devolution British nationals abroad Delegated legislation Employment Health services Families Immigration Environment protection EU law Legislation EU nationals Ministerial powers Northern Ireland Recycling Monitoring Reciprocal arrangements Scotland Standards Sovereignty Refugees Regulation Safety Wales Waste Henry VIII clauses Independent monitoring boards Brexit UK relations with EU Sewel convention
Legislation
European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill 2019-21
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk