Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Caithness (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Friday, 15 March 2019. It occurred during Debate on bill on House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) (Abolition of By-Elections) Bill [HL].


House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) (Abolition of By-Elections) Bill [HL]

My Lords, that is the noble Lord’s interpretation of the agreement. I was not party to it, but it was introduced by the then Lord Chancellor, the noble and learned Lord, Lord Irvine of Lairg, and it was binding in Privy Council terms on all of us who took part in that debate. That was a binding commitment. I have tabled an amendment that we shall come to later to try to help the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, get to the same position that I want to get to, which is to get rid of the hereditary Peers in this House.

Perhaps I may return to my amendments. I set out in quite considerable detail how the House of Lords statutory appointments commission should work. It will come as no surprise to my noble friend Lord Young on the Front Bench because he will recognise the details. They come from Schedules 5 and 6 to the 2012 Bill, which, sadly, failed in another place. I would have supported it had it come to this House. His name was on that Bill, as indeed was Danny Alexander’s, so I presume that the Liberal party still supports a statutory appointments commission, and I look forward to getting the support of its Members for this.

I do something slightly different from my noble friend. I set out that there should be a House of Lords appointments commission, and, equally and importantly, that there should be a Speakers’ committee comprising 13 members, as designed in 2012, to oversee the statutory appointments commission. It was drafted by a government draftsman, so I will not go into any detail, but I hope that the House will give this consideration. As my noble friend Lord Strathclyde said, there would be a lacuna. When the hereditary Peers go, it would be a much better arrangement if there were a totally independent committee to look at all appointments. My amendment covers all that. Proposed new subsection (4) in Amendment 58 says that it should come into operation,

“on a statutory basis, with the role of screening, selecting and recommending all persons for appointment to the House of Lords”.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
796 cc1222-3 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
By-elections Equality Hereditary peers House of Lords composition Exemptions House of Lords Appointments Commission Northern Ireland Scotland Wales
Legislation
House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) (Abolition of By-elections) Bill (HL) 2017-19
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk