Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Paddick (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 26 February 2019. It occurred during Debate on bill on Offensive Weapons Bill.


Offensive Weapons Bill

I thank the Minister for her explanation, although I am a little confused. My understanding is that, as part of compulsory age verification for access to online pornography, there is a list of age verification systems endorsed by the British Board of Film Classification on the Government’s behalf, and that these online pornography sites have to comply with the restrictions that the BBFC imposes in line with government instructions. Therefore, there is some age verification that relies on electronic systems, so a lot of what the Minister says seems to contradict what is happening in another part of the Government, the DCMS.

I thank other noble Lords for speaking to these amendments. The noble Lord, Lord Lucas, wanted the Government’s response on the record. We now have this, so I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.

Amendment 4 withdrawn.

Amendment 5


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
796 c163 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Crimes against the person Age Delivery services EU countries Licensing Liability Exemptions Labelling Internet Knives Pilot schemes Offensive weapons Mobile phones Staff Proof of identity Parcels Prison sentences Rehabilitation Sales Young people Young offenders Shops Technology Batteries Community orders Brexit Corrosive substances Knife crime prevention orders
Legislation
Offensive Weapons Bill 2017-19
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk