Skip to main content

1-19 of 19 results for subject:Collections

Subject X
Grants

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Grants (19)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I share with all noble Lords who have spoken in the debate gratitude to the noble Viscount, Lord Eccles, for raising such an important issue. He has given us a chance to explore—all too briefly, but all too accurately—the issues. My   problem is that, at the last count, I...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1030-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all Members who made such wide-ranging and interesting contributions to the debate. I also thank the Minister for the replies he gave to the points raised. I beg leave to withdraw the Motion for Papers. Motion for Papers, by leave, withdrawn.

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1036
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a great pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Addington, as he touched on one of the central themes of the museum of which I have the privilege to be the chairman—unpaid, like the noble Lord, Lord Faulkner, is of the Railway Heritage Committee—namely, the National...

Member
Lord Waldegrave of North Hill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Notes
Daily part printing error - in c1020-4 the first paragraph of the Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville's speech on museums was accidentally deleted, with the result that the rest of the Lord Brooke's speech was wrongly attributed to the Lord Waldegrave of North Hill. Correction given in Daily Part at 672 c1114.
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1017-20, (corrigendum) 1114
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a disappointment not to be following the noble Lord, Lord Wilson of Tillyorn, but it is a great pleasure to be following my noble friend Lord Waldegrave of North Hill, whose personal scope so impressively covers both science and the humanities. I congratulate my noble friend...

Member
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Notes
Daily part printing error - in c1020-4 the first paragraph of Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville's speech on museums was accidentally deleted, with the result that the result of the Lord Brooke's speech was wrongly attributed to the Lord Waldegrave of North Hill, correction given in Daily Part at 672 c1114.
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1020-4, (corrigendum) 1114
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the value of museums. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Viscount Eccles
Answering member
Lord Davies of Oldham
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1009-36
House
House of Lords

rose to call attention to the value of museums; and to move for Papers. The noble Viscount said: My Lords, I look forward to this debate on the value of museums. My interests in museums are, first, the Bowes Museum in County Durham, of which I am a trustee and...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1009-13
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when I saw the topic of this debate and decided to put my name down to speak to it, I was inspired by something that the noble Viscount, Lord Eccles, mentioned: memories of enjoying museums. In my earliest years in my home city of Norwich, people went to...

Member
Lord Addington (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1016-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it gives me great pleasure to follow the noble Viscount and to congratulate him on securing this debate and for giving such an excellent speech in describing in relatively few words the profound effect for good that museums have on our society. Indeed, they contribute so much and...

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1013-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Eccles for introducing this timely debate. I was particularly interested in his focus on enjoyment of museums because we sometimes forget that it is an important part of why we go. Obviously, we go to learn, for scholarship and for lots of...

Member
Viscount Astor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1027-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it has been a fascinating debate. It is not often in this House, first, that one has to follow the noble Lord, Lord Brooke, which is always difficult; but also that one thinks that one would like to have a rather longer debate. We have had some excellent,...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1024-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not tying investment in museums with the question of the success of the London bid. Rather, I seek to build on the point made by noble Lords around the House: the capital city needs to nurture, cherish and develop its cultural resources because they make it...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1034-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry to press the Minister, but does that mean that he is giving us the assurance that the noble Lord, Lord Waldegrave, was asking for and is of some concern to museum directors?

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1034
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise to the noble Lord. I recognise the importance of the point that he raises, and I do not doubt that it is relevant to the expenditure commitments of my department. However, we have had a debate that has had a coherence to it because Members of...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1035
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for intervening at the end of the Minister’s remarks when I was not able to listen to the whole debate, but I understand that the topic I wish to approach him on has not been covered. The Minister may have seen last week in the newspapers...

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1035
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have sought to indicate in broad terms the light touch adopted by the department. We have never received a complaint from the National Heritage Memorial Fund about a heavy-handed approach adopted by the department. It is not the department’s role to direct, but rather from to time...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1035-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, just before we finish, would the Minister be kind enough to write to me on the subject of the directions from the DCMS to the National Heritage Memorial Fund and thus to the Heritage Lottery Fund under its Acts of Parliament?

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2005
Reference
672 c1035
House
House of Lords

By how much he plans to increase the government grant-in-aid to the National Railway Museum in the current financial year and in future years to compensate for the museum's loss of the right to claim redundant railway equipment at no cost from certain railway undertakings. - Inc fig.

Asked by
Hugh Bayley (Labour)
Answering body
Department of National Heritage
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 April 1994
Reference
242 c252-3W;242 c250-1W
House
House of Commons

If he will comment on Government support for the National Collections of Industrial and Marine Bacteria.

Asked by
Tam Dalyell (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 November 1992
Reference
214 c579W;214 c582W
House
House of Commons

What commission his Department paid to NCIMB Ltd., in respect of the National Collections of Industrial and Marine Bacteria. - Inc figure.

Asked by
Tam Dalyell (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 November 1992
Reference
214 c575W;214 c579W
House
House of Commons