Skip to main content

1-20 of 262 results for subject:Blood

Session X
2016-17

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, with reference to the Answer of 11 January 1988 to the right hon. Member for Birkenhead, Official Report, column 184W, on contaminated blood products, if he will place a copy of the letter sent to that right hon. Member in the Library.

Asked by
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
71814
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what plans the Government has to remove the bar on men who have sex with men seeking to donate blood.

Asked by
Cat Smith (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
71026
House
House of Commons

Yesterday, my right hon. Friend the Member for Leigh (Andy Burnham)—who will be much missed in this House—had a debate on contaminated blood, in which he called for an independent, Hillsborough-style panel to get to the truth. The Prime Minister has praised the independent panel approach as a way to open up the door to justice, so will she join Labour and the Scottish National party in committing to setting up such a process in her party’s manifesto?

Asked by
George Howarth (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
624 c1112
House
House of Commons

Last July, we committed £125 million of extra funding for those affected by the contaminated blood tragedy of the ’70s and ’80s. That is more than any previous Government have provided. We published

some proposed reforms last year, and we are now consulting on a new measure to allow the people affected to benefit from higher annual payments, but I can reassure everybody that everyone will receive, at a minimum, what they receive now as a result of the proposed changes. The Department of Health will respond to the consultation in due course.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
624 c1112
House
House of Commons

Through you, Madam Deputy Speaker, may I thank Mr Speaker for giving me this opportunity to make what will be my last speech in this House? I make it on the subject of contaminated blood for a simple reason: knowing what I know, and what I believe to be true,...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 cc1071-2
House
House of Commons

I pay tribute to my right hon. Friend’s outstanding work on the Hillsborough inquiry and what he achieved there. Obviously there is still more to do. On behalf of the all-party parliamentary group, I am so grateful that my right hon. Friend was willing to share his experiences with us...

Member
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 c1072
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has put her finger on the point. With Hillsborough, when we finally got to match up documents held at a local level with those held at a national level, the full picture began to emerge. It is my contention that exactly the same would emerge here. The...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 cc1072-3
House
House of Commons

One of the reasons why this has not taken off widely as a real campaign is that victims understandably do not want to advertise their condition to those around them. I pay tribute to those who have talked to Members of Parliament, even on a confidential basis, so that some...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 c1073
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is absolutely correct. There is a stigma related to HIV and hepatitis. People do not want to talk about it openly. Although I have drawn a parallel with Hillsborough—the hon. Gentleman was outstanding in his support for me on that issue—there are many differences, and one major...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 cc1073-6
House
House of Commons

Was my right hon. Friend shocked, as I was, to learn that in November 1983, the then Health Secretary told Parliament:

There is no conclusive evidence that acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) is transmitted by blood products”?—[Official Report, 14 November 1983; Vol. 48, c. 328W.]

Only months earlier, however, the Department had...

Member
Diana Johnson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 c1074
House
House of Commons

I fear that my hon. Friend is right once again. I am aware that individuals received Crown immunity to protect the Government from litigation at the time. That paints a strong picture, and that is why we need to see the papers and find out what happened. I do not...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 c1077
House
House of Commons

I pay tribute to the work that my right hon. Friend did when he was Secretary of State for Health. I was in the Department with him as a Parliamentary Private Secretary. Are we saying that the information is immune from the Data Protection Act and the Freedom of Information...

Member
Jim Cunningham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 c1077
House
House of Commons

I think people have applied for documents, but many of those documents have been withheld. I will come on to that in a moment.

I was a Minister in the Department of Health just after the publication of the Archer report and the Government’s response to it. At the instigation of...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 c1077
House
House of Commons

I pay tribute to the right hon. Gentleman for the work he has done on this issue and many others. The third case he described is surely one of defamation. Does he not agree that all families affected must, if they have not done so already, access their medical records...

Member
Chris Stephens (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 c1077
House
House of Commons

It is a case of at least defamation. A range of potential offences, such as misconduct in public office, could be considered. It remains the case that people have not had access to their full medical records. There are just so many examples of people saying that crucial pages are...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 c1077
House
House of Commons

I pay tribute to my right hon. Friend and my hon. Friend the Member for Kingston upon Hull North (Diana Johnson) for the work they have done in exposing this issue. When Alex Smith, a constituent of mine, first came to my advice surgery to tell me the story of...

Member
Jim McMahon (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 c1078
House
House of Commons

I think it has such a feel. For me, the whole thing about finance—it is always about finance, and about whether we can give them a bit more—has been helpful to the Government, because it has meant that they have never focused on the issue they should really focus on....

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 c1078
House
House of Commons

It seems to me that the right hon. Gentleman is making three major points. The first is that those still alive who are affected and their families need proper, generous help without delay. The second is that there should be an inquiry into what went wrong all the way through,...

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 c1078
House
House of Commons

That was the direct content of the Stanford letter. There was a worry that the NHS was using such products in a completely different context, not understanding the difference between the two systems. That was the Stanford letter.

I am not standing here claiming to be an expert on all the...

Member
Andy Burnham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 c1078
House
House of Commons

I was not going to intervene, but the hon. Member for Worthing West (Sir Peter Bottomley) made the point that generous treatment is needed. The victims of this NHS scandal are not receiving generous treatment. I have a constituent who was infected during the scandal as a child at the...

Member
Baroness Keeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2017
Reference
624 c1078
House
House of Commons