Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andy Burnham (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 25 April 2017. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Contaminated Blood.


Contaminated Blood

My hon. Friend has put her finger on the point. With Hillsborough, when we finally got to match up documents held at a local level with those held at a national level, the full picture began to emerge. It is my contention that exactly the same would emerge here. The direct examples of a cover-up that I am about to give, relating to individual cases, would then be put together with what we know about documents held—or, indeed, not held, which itself implies wrongdoing—at a national level. In the end, it is the putting together of that picture that gives people the truth and allows them to understand how this happened. I will come directly to that point later.

I will focus on three cases. I highlight these cases not because they are the only ones I have seen or been sent, but because I have met or spoken directly to the individuals concerned, have a high degree of confidence in the facts

and believe that these cases are representative of many more. The first case is of a gentleman who does not want to be named. I will call him Stuart, but I do have his full details.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
624 cc1072-3 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Compensation Contamination Blood Diseases Maladministration Negligence Blood transfusions
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk