Skip to main content

1-20 of 3,098 results for subject:Scotland

Member X
David Mundell

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

Mundell, David (3,098)
More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Last summer, the Prime Minister and his family holidayed in my constituency. Now that he has more time on his hands, he would be very welcome back—as are all hon. Members. If the Leader of the House finds himself unexpectedly with some spare time towards the end of the month,...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
789 c1089
House
House of Commons

I will not be overly effusive about the Secretary of State or the Minister, because that might not be helpful for them in the next few days; when there was a previous change of Prime Minister, as soon as Anna Soubry stood up and said that I had done a good job at the Scotland Office, I knew I was doomed!

Will the Secretary of State make it clear to the right hon. Member for Makerfield (Andy Burnham) that devolution in itself is not the answer? It is about how it is used. We recently saw that in Scotland, when the Scottish Parliament voted in favour of another independence referendum and against an inquiry into SNP finances.

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
789 c916
House
House of Commons

That this House commends Scotland’s Tartan Army for the outstanding example set during recent international fixtures in North America; notes the warmth, humour, generosity and exemplary conduct of thousands of travelling supporters; recognises that the Tartan Army captured hearts across the world through personal interactions and the power of social...

Primary sponsor
Dave Doogan (Scottish National Party)
Type
Early day motions
Date
29 June 2026
Reference
471
House
House of Commons

I begin by commending Craig Hoy on his election as MSP for Dumfriesshire, and on ensuring that the blue wall of Scottish Conservative and Unionist seats in the south of Scotland remains intact. Ahead of those elections, the leader of the SNP, John Swinney, asserted that if the SNP gained...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
14 May 2026
Reference
786 c133
House
House of Commons

Obviously I do not agree with the Secretary of State’s analysis, but I think we can agree that child poverty and the other challenges that face real people in Scotland should be the focus of this Scottish Parliament election campaign, and not independence, for which, incredibly, the Reform UK candidate in Dumfriesshire voted. Does the Secretary of State agree that anybody in Scotland who does not want to see Scotland spend five more years in a constitutional cul-de-sac should use their vote wisely to stop an SNP majority?

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
783 c808
House
House of Commons

Motion that this House has considered the potential merits of modernising marriage regulations. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
David Mundell
Answering member
Sarah Sackman
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Backbench debates
Date
12 March 2026
Reference
782 cc206-191WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the potential merits of modernising marriage regulations.

It is a great pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Christopher. The gateway to my constituency, and indeed Scotland, is the historical village of Gretna Green. For centuries, Gretna Green has been shorthand for the...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2026
Reference
782 c206WH
House
House of Commons

I agree. The hon. Lady will be aware that many humanists come to Scotland, and indeed to Gretna Green, to get married for that very reason. That issue needs to be addressed in the context of modernising marriage regulations.

Dumfries and Galloway council, one of the three councils in my Dumfriesshire,...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2026
Reference
782 cc182-3WH
House
House of Commons

I thank all participants for their engagement in this debate. I particularly welcome the Minister’s remarks and the tone of those remarks. As my hon. Friend the Member for Bexhill and Battle (Dr Mullan) said, it is important to reflect on the experience of the people carrying out weddings at...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2026
Reference
782 c190WH
House
House of Commons

I begin by paying tribute to the former Scottish Cabinet Secretary Jeane Freeman, who sadly passed away this month. I dealt extensively with Jeane in the implementation of the Scotland Act 2016 and always found her very professional and personable. I also hope that the Secretary of State’s visit to New Zealand was particularly successful, although it did seem an extremely long way to go just to avoid Anas Sarwar.

The Secretary of State may be aware that there is a very successful HIV testing programme in England in HIV testing week. Could he make representations to the Scottish Government so that not only is there an HIV testing week in Scotland, but, radically, it is the same week as in England, so that it could benefit from national focus?

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 February 2026
Reference
781 c316
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland, whether he has had discussions with the First Minster of Scotland on HIV Testing Week.

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Withdrawn
Date
12 February 2026
Reference
908002
House
House of Commons

The Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill is still under consideration in the Scottish Parliament and has not been passed, contrary to the views of a number of Members of this House. This week, a number of measures had to be removed from the Bill because they were not compliant with the powers of the Scottish Parliament, but Scottish Ministers suggested that they were in an ongoing discussion with the UK Government about a future section 104 order. Can Ministers update the House on the current discussions with the Scottish Government? And do they agree with me that ultimately—

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
22 January 2026
Reference
779 c461
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State will know that the Borderlands inclusive growth deal is an important factor in driving growth in the south of Scotland, and I am looking forward to speaking to the Minister next week about the deal. With such deals, the important thing is getting the money out the door. Over the years, a number of projects originally identified will not now go ahead. Does the Secretary of State agree that new projects should be brought on board, including replacing the bridges at Annan, which have been damaged in storms over recent years?

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
778 c912
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of progress in delivering the Borderlands Inclusive Growth Deal.

Asked by
David Mundell (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Withdrawn
Date
6 January 2026
Reference
907183
House
House of Commons

It would be wrong not to commend the hon. Member for Alloa and Grangemouth (Brian Leishman) on this announcement as he has always been such a strong advocate for jobs at Grangemouth. Indeed, owing to his willingness to speak out against his Government, he lost the Labour Whip.

I noted from...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 December 2025
Reference
777 cc988-9
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Dunfermline and Dollar (Graeme Downie) on securing this debate, which gives us an opportunity to consider some of the important issues facing Scotland. As a Member of the Scottish Parliament in 1999, I was very disappointed not to have the opportunity to take part...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
777 cc534-5
House
House of Commons

I am sure that we do not want to go down the blind alley of a long discussion about this flood prevention scheme, but it was the subject of a public inquiry, because—this is one of the most important parts of the issue—it does not command public support. That, in...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
777 c535
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady will be pleased to hear that change in Scotland is the theme of my speech, because I agree that we desperately need it.

In relation to SNP promises, we have heard it all before. Year in, year out, SNP boasts about bringing down waiting times ring hollow in...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
777 c536
House
House of Commons

As Members across the Chamber know, this is a well-used SNP tactic of constant comparison with other places, rather than focusing on the SNP Government’s delivery compared with their promises. It is clear that there is a huge discrepancy between what has been promised by the Scottish Government and what...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
777 c536
House
House of Commons

I do. What the hon. Lady points to is the shuffling of figures that we have just seen, so that the best figures are presented, but those 86,000 people I mentioned who have been on waiting lists for more than a year are erased from the debate. It is all...

Member
David Mundell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2025
Reference
777 cc401-537
House
House of Commons