Oral question asked in the House of Commons, by David Mundell (Conservative). It was answered on Wednesday, 15 April 2026 on behalf of the Scotland Office.
Child Poverty
- Question
-
Obviously I do not agree with the Secretary of State’s analysis, but I think we can agree that child poverty and the other challenges that face real people in Scotland should be the focus of this Scottish Parliament election campaign, and not independence, for which, incredibly, the Reform UK candidate in Dumfriesshire voted. Does the Secretary of State agree that anybody in Scotland who does not want to see Scotland spend five more years in a constitutional cul-de-sac should use their vote wisely to stop an SNP majority?
- Answer
-
It is always important for the electorate to use their votes wisely, but the fact is that there are two parties that are deeply threatened by Scottish Labour’s emergence as the credible alternative to the SNP. They are, on the one hand, the Scottish National party and, on the other hand, Reform. If we think about it, their interests are completely aligned, in talking Reform up and talking Scottish Labour down. I certainly hope that people act wisely and make sure that this Scottish election is about Scotland.
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral question
- Reference
- 783 c808
- Session
- 2024-26
- Oral question type
- Supplementary
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Poverty Children Scotland
- Link
- View this Oral question on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-04-16 15:35:02 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-04-15/26041531000039
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-04-15/26041531000039
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2026-04-15/26041531000039