Skip to main content

1-20 of 37 results for subject:Devolution

Member X
Duke of Montrose
Subject X
EU law

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Montrose, Duke of (37)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
EU law (37)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I am very glad to be able to talk on this subject, and I declare my interest as a livestock rearer in Scotland.

This group is much focused on animals involved in exports, and I was thinking that many other speakers in the House today would want to comment...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 September 2020
Reference
805 cc555-1533
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a great pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Wigley. I declare my interest as a livestock producer from Scotland.

Amendment 68A in my name emphasises much the same point for much the same reason. I have considerable admiration for my noble friend the Minister, who, along...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 September 2020
Reference
805 cc1497-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a great pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Jones, particularly when she is encouraging the Government to carry out their manifesto. I welcome the chance to examine this legislation so early in the parliamentary Session, as it will be a prime illustration of the Government’s...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2020
Reference
801 cc2203-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I try to follow all the arguments that are put forward about devolution and where it all stands. The puzzle to me is that the logic of the people supporting this amendment seems to be that the Parliament here at Westminster is not entirely sovereign. That may be...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2020
Reference
801 c1071
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is a provision in Section 29 of the Scotland Act that covers the thing that worries the noble and learned Lord. Section 29(2)(a) provides that it is outside the competence of the Scottish Government to apply,

“part of the law of a country or territory other than Scotland,...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2018
Reference
790 c2139
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may come in here to congratulate the Minister on how far the Government have got in solving this rather knotty problem. As I go with this, I feel that I should re-emphasise my authority for speaking as a Scot and as a nationalist, rather as my...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2018
Reference
790 cc2154-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is always a great pleasure to listen to the clear, analytical thinking of the noble Baroness, Lady O’Neill.

The Bill implies a fairly radical impact on two areas that have always been at the centre of my concerns: one being Scotland and devolution, the other being agriculture and...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2018
Reference
788 cc1481-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble and learned Lord the Minister for so fully explaining the ins and outs of these various additions to Schedule 5. On the question of bringing these regulations into line one with the other, I was interested to hear about the devolving of zootechnical feeds...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 May 2014
Reference
753 c377GC
House
House of Lords

I am very interested in this issue, on which I spoke in Committee. However, I am still rather puzzled as to what the Scottish Parliament will gain from this aspect of devolution because, as far as I can see, it already has powers to introduce any speed limit that it...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 March 2012
Reference
736 c1443
House
House of Lords

I hope that the Minister will forgive my ignorance on this matter, but he put forward in support of his argument the power under Section 30 of the Scotland Act. My noble friend Lord Forsyth was looking at that, as am I. Section 30(4) states: "““An Order in Council under...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2012
Reference
736 c487
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been a very far-reaching and complicated debate and I must thank all those who participated in it. I must also apologise to your Lordships for starting off in such a rushed manner. I had gone out of the Chamber to see if I could find out...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2012
Reference
736 c446-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is probably not my role to get the Minister off the hook in any way but we are, quite rightly, taking the sober and, one might say, realistic view that Scottish tax might go up. We are obviously missing what one might consider to be the almost...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2012
Reference
736 c452
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a paving amendment, and I shall address my remarks also to Amendment 54BA and the other amendments in the group. Amendment 54BA will remove the close connection condition for the purposes of identifying a Scottish taxpayer. This is an effort to remove the complications that come...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2012
Reference
736 c430-1
House
House of Lords

54ZA: Clause 30, page 23, line 10, leave out ““A””

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2012
Reference
736 c430
House
House of Lords

I wonder whether the noble Lord remembers getting a demand for taxes from the Inland Revenue which, presumably, was sent to his house because it knows where his house is.

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2012
Reference
736 c434
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is the type of complication that we are talking about. In fact, the way the Bill is at the moment, it will practically be a question of where you spend the night. There are commuters from Glasgow or Edinburgh to London, and a variety of public office...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2012
Reference
736 c431-2
House
House of Lords

Is it a convention?

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 March 2012
Reference
736 c473
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in opening this debate on what is presently something of a probing Motion, I want just to draw the attention of the Committee to the fact that this and the two previous amendments have broached the subject of Westminster reserving powers that were originally part of the general...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2012
Reference
734 c1698-700
House
House of Lords

Perhaps my noble and learned friend could clarify one of the points introduced by the noble Lord, Lord Browne of Ladyton. The power in the Bill would presumably prevent the Scottish Parliament making any legislation on powerful weapons—it would be able to bring in regulation only on the non-powerful weapons—whereas...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2012
Reference
734 c1686
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all those who have contributed to this discussion. It has been some time since Antarctica has been before your Lordships' House and covered in so much detail. It is particularly interesting to hear former Scottish Ministers voicing what the perspective was when they were holding office...

Member
Duke of Montrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 February 2012
Reference
734 c1704
House
House of Lords