1-20 of 60 results for subject:Extradition
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.18 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Extradition
- We searched for
- subject_t:Extradition OR subject_ses:91213
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Will my right hon. Friend give way?
Will my right hon. Friend give way?
Hon. Members are understandably concerned about the constitutional implications of the changes, but I support my right hon. Friend’s stance. Is it not important to reflect on the implications of not participating in the European arrest warrant? Having separate arrangements with all 28 countries of the EU would tie the...
Hon. Members are understandably concerned about the constitutional implications of the changes, but I support my right hon. Friend’s stance. Is it not important to reflect on the implications of not participating in the European arrest warrant? Having separate arrangements with all 28 countries of the EU would tie the...
I support my right hon. Friend’s stance in relation to the European arrest warrant, which is an important tool in fighting serious crime, although clearly, as the Government recognise, it needs amendment. If the test relates to the national interest and the stance on supranational institutions, does she share my...
I support my right hon. Friend’s stance in relation to the European arrest warrant, which is an important tool in fighting serious crime, although clearly, as the Government recognise, it needs amendment. If the test relates to the national interest and the stance on supranational institutions, does she share my...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many UK nationals have been extradited to foreign countries in each month since May 2010; and to which destination in each case.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many UK nationals have been extradited to foreign countries in each month since May 2010; and to which destination in each case.
| UK nationals surrendered to Part Two countries | ||
|---|---|---|
| Number of UK nationals | Destinations | |
| 2010 | ||
| May | 2 | Australia and USA |
| June | 0 | — |
| July | 0 | — |
| August | 0 | — |
| September | 0 | — |
| October | 0 | — |
| November | 0 | — |
| December | 0 | — |
| 2011 | ||
| January | 0 | — |
| February | 2 | Canada and USA |
| March | 0 | — |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people are held in the UK awaiting extradition to (a) EU countries and (b) non-EU countries.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people are held in the UK awaiting extradition to (a) EU countries and (b) non-EU countries.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the cost to her Department in each cost category was of responding to requests for extradition in each year since 2006.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the cost to her Department in each cost category was of responding to requests for extradition in each year since 2006.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many requests for extradition from the UK in (a) 2006, (b) 2007, (c) 2008, (d) 2009 and (e) 2010 (i) were granted, (ii) were denied and (iii) remain outstanding.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many requests for extradition from the UK in (a) 2006, (b) 2007, (c) 2008, (d) 2009 and (e) 2010 (i) were granted, (ii) were denied and (iii) remain outstanding.
| Incoming requests | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 |
| Requests received | 64 | 49 | 57 | 81 | 86 |
| Surrendered | 45 | 29 | 17 | 38 | 27 |
| Discharged (by courts) | 19 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 8 |
| Refused (Secretary of State) | 5 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Withdrawn by requesting state | 14 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Not returned (miscellaneous) | 4 | 20 | 13 | 14 | 11 |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment her Department has made of the extent of parity in extradition processes between the UK and (a) other OECD countries, (b) countries in the Americas and (c) South Africa.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment her Department has made of the extent of parity in extradition processes between the UK and (a) other OECD countries, (b) countries in the Americas and (c) South Africa.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent representations her Department has received on procedures for the extradition of UK citizens to South Africa.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent representations her Department has received on procedures for the extradition of UK citizens to South Africa.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when she plans to report to the House the outcome of her Department's review of extradition.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when she plans to report to the House the outcome of her Department's review of extradition.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what requests (a) the UK and (b) the US has made under the terms of the UK-US Extradition Treaty since 2003; and what the outcome of each such request has been.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what requests (a) the UK and (b) the US has made under the terms of the UK-US Extradition Treaty since 2003; and what the outcome of each such request has been.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what estimate she has made of the number of people extradited from the UK in the last three years who have subsequently returned to the UK.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what estimate she has made of the number of people extradited from the UK in the last three years who have subsequently returned to the UK.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the cost to the public purse was of the extradition case The Government of the Republic of Serbia v. Dr Ejup Ganic concluded by the judgment of 27 July 2010.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the cost to the public purse was of the extradition case The Government of the Republic of Serbia v. Dr Ejup Ganic concluded by the judgment of 27 July 2010.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many UK citizens have been (a) extradited and (b) transferred to face criminal proceedings in each other EU member state in each year since 1997;
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many UK citizens have been (a) extradited and (b) transferred to face criminal proceedings in each other EU member state in each year since 1997;
| October 2008 to March 2009, British Nationals, EAW cases and surrenders | ||
|---|---|---|
| Requesting country | Requests | Surrenders |
| Cyprus | 1 | 0 |
| France | 5 | 0 |
| Germany | 5 | 0 |
| Greece | 2 | 0 |
| Hungary | 2 | 0 |
| Ireland | 2 | 0 |
| Italy | 2 | 0 |
| Lithuania | 1 | 0 |
| Netherlands | 7 | 2 |
| Romania | 1 | 0 |
| Spain | 6 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 3 |
| Business year 2009-10, British Nationals, EAW cases and surrenders | ||
|---|---|---|
| Requesting country | Requests | Surrenders |
| Belgium | 8 | 1 |
| Cyprus | 1 | 3 |
| Finland | 1 | 0 |
| France | 20 | 5 |
| Germany | 27 | 2 |
| Greece | 11 | 1 |
| Hungary | 1 | 1 |
| Ireland | 9 | 4 |
| Italy | 6 | 0 |
| Latvia | 0 | 1 |
| Lithuania | 2 | 0 |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 1 |
| Malta | 1 | 2 |
| Netherlands | 29 | 8 |
| Poland | 2 | 1 |
| Portugal | 3 | 0 |
| Slovenia | 3 | 0 |
| Spain | 31 | 11 |
| Sweden | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 157 | 41 |
| Extradition requests received, 1997 to 2009 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Requests received | Surrendered | Not returned | |
| 1997 | 107 | 43 | 27 |
| 1998 | 111 | 45 | 45 |
| 1999 | 101 | 38 | 25 |
| 2000 | 78 | 47 | 28 |
| 2001 | 133 | 55 | 42 |
| 2002 | 137 | 53 | 54 |
| 2003 | 114 | 55 | 39 |
| 2004 | 99 | 50 | 41 |
| 2005 | 54 | 62 | 37 |
| 2006 | 64 | 45 | 38 |
| 2007 | 49 | 29 | 25 |
| 2008 | 57 | 17 | 18 |
| 2009 | 81 | 38 | 31 |
(3) how many applications for UK citizens to be extradited to face criminal proceedings were made by each non-EU state in each year since 1997; and how many such applications were successful.
(3) how many applications for UK citizens to be extradited to face criminal proceedings were made by each non-EU state in each year since 1997; and how many such applications were successful.
| October 2008 to March 2009, British Nationals, EAW cases and surrenders | ||
|---|---|---|
| Requesting country | Requests | Surrenders |
| Cyprus | 1 | 0 |
| France | 5 | 0 |
| Germany | 5 | 0 |
| Greece | 2 | 0 |
| Hungary | 2 | 0 |
| Ireland | 2 | 0 |
| Italy | 2 | 0 |
| Lithuania | 1 | 0 |
| Netherlands | 7 | 2 |
| Romania | 1 | 0 |
| Spain | 6 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 3 |
| Business year 2009-10, British Nationals, EAW cases and surrenders | ||
|---|---|---|
| Requesting country | Requests | Surrenders |
| Belgium | 8 | 1 |
| Cyprus | 1 | 3 |
| Finland | 1 | 0 |
| France | 20 | 5 |
| Germany | 27 | 2 |
| Greece | 11 | 1 |
| Hungary | 1 | 1 |
| Ireland | 9 | 4 |
| Italy | 6 | 0 |
| Latvia | 0 | 1 |
| Lithuania | 2 | 0 |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 1 |
| Malta | 1 | 2 |
| Netherlands | 29 | 8 |
| Poland | 2 | 1 |
| Portugal | 3 | 0 |
| Slovenia | 3 | 0 |
| Spain | 31 | 11 |
| Sweden | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 157 | 41 |
| Extradition requests received, 1997 to 2009 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Requests received | Surrendered | Not returned | |
| 1997 | 107 | 43 | 27 |
| 1998 | 111 | 45 | 45 |
| 1999 | 101 | 38 | 25 |
| 2000 | 78 | 47 | 28 |
| 2001 | 133 | 55 | 42 |
| 2002 | 137 | 53 | 54 |
| 2003 | 114 | 55 | 39 |
| 2004 | 99 | 50 | 41 |
| 2005 | 54 | 62 | 37 |
| 2006 | 64 | 45 | 38 |
| 2007 | 49 | 29 | 25 |
| 2008 | 57 | 17 | 18 |
| 2009 | 81 | 38 | 31 |
(2) how many applications for UK citizens to be (a) extradited and (b) transferred to face criminal proceedings in each other EU member state in each year since 1997 were successful;
(2) how many applications for UK citizens to be (a) extradited and (b) transferred to face criminal proceedings in each other EU member state in each year since 1997 were successful;
| October 2008 to March 2009, British Nationals, EAW cases and surrenders | ||
|---|---|---|
| Requesting country | Requests | Surrenders |
| Cyprus | 1 | 0 |
| France | 5 | 0 |
| Germany | 5 | 0 |
| Greece | 2 | 0 |
| Hungary | 2 | 0 |
| Ireland | 2 | 0 |
| Italy | 2 | 0 |
| Lithuania | 1 | 0 |
| Netherlands | 7 | 2 |
| Romania | 1 | 0 |
| Spain | 6 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 3 |
| Business year 2009-10, British Nationals, EAW cases and surrenders | ||
|---|---|---|
| Requesting country | Requests | Surrenders |
| Belgium | 8 | 1 |
| Cyprus | 1 | 3 |
| Finland | 1 | 0 |
| France | 20 | 5 |
| Germany | 27 | 2 |
| Greece | 11 | 1 |
| Hungary | 1 | 1 |
| Ireland | 9 | 4 |
| Italy | 6 | 0 |
| Latvia | 0 | 1 |
| Lithuania | 2 | 0 |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 1 |
| Malta | 1 | 2 |
| Netherlands | 29 | 8 |
| Poland | 2 | 1 |
| Portugal | 3 | 0 |
| Slovenia | 3 | 0 |
| Spain | 31 | 11 |
| Sweden | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 157 | 41 |
| Extradition requests received, 1997 to 2009 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Requests received | Surrendered | Not returned | |
| 1997 | 107 | 43 | 27 |
| 1998 | 111 | 45 | 45 |
| 1999 | 101 | 38 | 25 |
| 2000 | 78 | 47 | 28 |
| 2001 | 133 | 55 | 42 |
| 2002 | 137 | 53 | 54 |
| 2003 | 114 | 55 | 39 |
| 2004 | 99 | 50 | 41 |
| 2005 | 54 | 62 | 37 |
| 2006 | 64 | 45 | 38 |
| 2007 | 49 | 29 | 25 |
| 2008 | 57 | 17 | 18 |
| 2009 | 81 | 38 | 31 |
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent assessment she has made of the operation of the UK-US Extradition Treaty.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent assessment she has made of the operation of the UK-US Extradition Treaty.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) cases regarding extradition from the UK in respect of persons accused of terrorist offences and (b) appeals by persons convicted of terrorist offences in the UK are active before the European Court of Human Rights.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) cases regarding extradition from the UK in respect of persons accused of terrorist offences and (b) appeals by persons convicted of terrorist offences in the UK are active before the European Court of Human Rights.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many proposed extraditions of terrorist suspects have not proceeded for reasons related to rights contained in the European Convention of Human Rights in each of the last three years; and for what reason each did not proceed.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many proposed extraditions of terrorist suspects have not proceeded for reasons related to rights contained in the European Convention of Human Rights in each of the last three years; and for what reason each did not proceed.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department who will lead the review of extradition arrangements between the UK and the US administration; and what the terms of reference will be of that review.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department who will lead the review of extradition arrangements between the UK and the US administration; and what the terms of reference will be of that review.