Skip to main content

1-20 of 188 results for subject:"Information Commissioner's Office"

Member X
Lord Clement-Jones

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Clement-Jones, Lord (188)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Moved by

Lord Clement-Jones

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
855 c1073
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as we reach these final stages of ping-pong on the Bill, I will first express the profound regret and disappointment of the Liberal Democrat Benches at the posture now being adopted by the Conservative Opposition. I have immense respect for the noble Lord, Lord Nash, and the tireless...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
855 cc1074-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, briefly, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate on Motion A1. I thank in particular the noble Lord, Lord Nash, and the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron, who have done so much to contribute to the way this debate has moved forward. I thank the...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 April 2026
Reference
855 c1084
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his introduction. Of course, we recognise that this instrument is a technical necessity. It ensures that the statute book remains coherent as we transition from the Office of the Information Commissioner to the new Information Commission. Obviously, not to agree these regulations would...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
854 cc157-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry to interrupt the Minister, but there must be a planning date. If any private business were transforming itself, it would have a target date of April the 5th or 6th, or whatever it might be, but there seems to be no certainty here, and therefore...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
854 c160GC
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with the Information Commissioner's Office about the evidential basis for commercially viable models of contextual advertising that do not require user consent.

Asked by
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 December 2025
Reference
HL12729
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have asked the Information Commissioner's Office to assess the relative economic and privacy impacts of (1) contextual, and (2) personalised, advertising models.

Asked by
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 December 2025
Reference
HL12669
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the potential economic impact of the Information Commissioner's Office's proposed regulatory approach to online advertising on the publishing sector.

Asked by
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
HL12547
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the Information Commissioner's Office's approach to regulation of online advertising on economic growth in creative industries.

Asked by
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 2025
Reference
HL12550
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in carrying on on this group, I will speak to the question that Clause 78 stands part, and to Amendments 107, 109, 125, 154, 155 and 156, but to start I support Amendment 87 in the name of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd. We...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2024
Reference
842 cc1-3GC
House
House of Lords

I will take any compliment.

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2024
Reference
842 c4GC
House
House of Lords

The Minister said there is a power to amend, but she has not said whether she thinks that would be desirable. Is the power to be used only if we are found not to be data-adequate because the immigration exemption does not apply across the board? That is, will the...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2024
Reference
842 c6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the debate on this group emphasises how far behind the curve we are, whether it is by including new provisions in this Bill or by bringing forward an AI Bill—which, after all, was promised in the Government’s manifesto. It emphasises that we are not moving nearly fast enough...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2024
Reference
842 cc14-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the amendments spoken to so well by the noble Baroness, Lady Harding, regarding the open electoral register. They are intended to provide legal certainty around the use of the register, without compromising on any aspect of the data privacy of UK citizens or risking data adequacy....

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2024
Reference
842 cc19-21GC
House
House of Lords

When does the Minister anticipate that the ICO will produce that report?

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2024
Reference
842 c24GC
House
House of Lords

May I ask the Minister a hypothetical question? If the ICO believes that these are not desirable, what instruments are there for changing the law? Can the ICO, under its own steam, so to speak, ban them; do we need to do it in primary legislation; or can it be...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2024
Reference
842 c24GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Clement-Jones

108: Clause 79, page 93, line 18, leave out “court” and insert “tribunal”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment is consequential on the new Clause (Transfer of jurisdiction of courts to tribunals).

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2024
Reference
842 c26GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 108, I will also speak to all the other amendments in this group. They are all designed to transfer all existing provisions from the courts to the tribunals and simplify the enforcement of data rights. Is that not something to be desired? This is not...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2024
Reference
842 cc26-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response to my amendments and welcome him to the Dispatch Box and a whole world of pain on the Data (Use and Access) Bill, as he has, no doubt, noted already after just two hours’ worth of this Committee.

I found his response...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2024
Reference
842 c30GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was listening very carefully. Does “underpinned by the regulations” mean that it will be underpinned?

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 December 2024
Reference
842 c45GC
House
House of Lords