Proceeding contribution from Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 19 March 2026. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Middle East.
Middle East
My Lords, the key justification of President Trump in launching this war of choice was that it was a pre-emptive action on his part because Iran was poised to produce nuclear weapons. Has not that claim been blown out of the water by the evidence just given to Congress by his Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, that Iran had not sought to enrich uranium since the massive attacks last summer, and that therefore there was no justification for pre-emption, as suggested by the President? Does this not justify our Prime Minister in his cautious response to the US demand for assistance and his tilt towards closer co-operation with our European allies?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 854 c1128
- Session
- 2024-26
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Armed conflict British nationals abroad Airports Cyprus Energy Energy supply Infrastructure Humanitarian aid Iraq Fertilisers Oil Ports Natural gas Prices Military bases Guided weapons Military aid Israel Iran Middle East Hezbollah Shipping Repatriation USA Saudi Arabia Russia Unmanned air systems Qatar Conflict resolution United Arab Emirates Jordan Bahrain Strait of Hormuz
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-04-14 14:43:46 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-03-19/26031950000048
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-03-19/26031950000048
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-03-19/26031950000048