Proceeding contribution from Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 January 2026. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Crime and Policing Bill.
Crime and Policing Bill
My Lords, this is an unusual amendment for me because it is very exploratory. At the end, I am going to ask the Minister three questions, which I would really like an answer to, perhaps in writing if it is not possible today. This amendment is supported by StopWatch, an organisation
that seeks accountable and fair policing. This is a crucial element of creating fair policing. When serious problems are found, how confident are we that the system can put them right? The system as it stands is a little jumbled. I suggest that it could do with some streamlining.
His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services does really important work in shining a light on what is going wrong, but inspection takes us only so far. My amendment asks whether the follow-through is strong enough and whether lessons from other regulated sectors could help turn findings into lasting improvements. In healthcare, education and financial services, regulators are able to require change. Those systems exist because inspection without action does not protect the public. The amendment invites us to consider whether policing oversight could benefit from similar clarity and grip. The amendment also raises the issue of co-ordination. Are HMICFRS, the Independent Office for Police Conduct, and police and crime commissioners working together as effectively as they can when forces fail to improve? Would clearer statutory alignment help ensure that warnings are acted on and not simply repeated?
Where concerns about proportionality and legitimacy keep resurfacing, it is right to ask whether the oversight framework is strong enough to drive change. As this Bill and others give more and more power to the police, this is the perfect time to ask. I would welcome the Minister’s response on three points. First, how do the Government judge whether inspection findings are actually leading to improvement on the ground? Secondly, have the Government considered whether closer co-operation between oversight bodies could strengthen accountability? Thirdly, are there lessons from other regulatory systems that the Government believe policing can learn from? I look forward to the Minister’s reply and to continuing this discussion as the Bill progresses.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 852 cc166-7
- Session
- 2024-26
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Crime Anti-social behaviour Cycling Digital technology Hire services Enforcement Police Offensive weapons Proof of identity Parking offences Road traffic offences Stop and search Pedestrian areas Electric scooters HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services Electric bicycles Non-crime hate incidents Balaclavas
- Legislation
- Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-02-12 11:53:25 +0000
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-01-20/26012077000034
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-01-20/26012077000034
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2026-01-20/26012077000034