Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley of Knighton (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 January 2025. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Great British Energy Bill.


Great British Energy Bill

My Lords, perhaps I may add a few words to some of the comments from the noble Lord, Lord Hamilton of Epsom. He mentioned the carbon cost of steel, but there is one other element we should not forget. I understand that building pylons to take power overground is cheaper than putting it underground, but I plead with the Minister to accept that there are areas that we should try to protect. In fact, in the long term, it is probably as cheap, if not cheaper, to put power lines underground. I recognise the dilemma that the Minister is in, but we should look at the aesthetic value of what we are talking about, as well as the financial one. I believe that there are some areas of the United Kingdom that we should protect at all costs.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
842 c940 
Session
2024-26
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Accountability Audit Agriculture Costs Annual reports Capital investment China Environment protection Energy Electricity generation Energy supply Land use Imports Investment returns Job creation Food supply Ministerial powers National security Nuclear power Parliamentary scrutiny Profits Prices Carbon emissions Storage Renewable energy Subsidies Supply chains National grid Trade competitiveness Great British Energy Great British Nuclear
Legislation
Great British Energy Bill 2024-26
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk