Proceeding contribution from Baroness Cumberlege (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 24 June 2013. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill.
Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill
My Lords, the reason is that without this amendment, the Bill changes those particular elements in those Acts. That is the advice that I have been given. I am very anxious that we ensure that these schools that have a religious designation are protected. I am not convinced that that is the case in the Bill as it stands, for the reasons that I have put before your Lordships.
I do not think that a Minister’s words in the House, however well meaning, stand the good test. They evaporate. We know that they are open to challenge, whereas amendments carried in the Bill, when it becomes an Act, are much less open to challenge. I urge my noble friend to have the welcomed assurances that she has given incorporated into the Bill.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 746 c553
- Session
- 2013-14
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Civil partnerships Equality Homosexuality Marriage
- Legislation
- Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill 2012-13 to 2013-14
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2014-04-17 21:17:45 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-24/13062426000027
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-24/13062426000027
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-24/13062426000027