Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Sam Rushworth (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 28 April 2026. It occurred during Debate and Speaker's statement on Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges.


Referral of Prime Minister to Committee of Privileges

The Whips have not told me very much, but I will address the right hon. Gentleman’s question as I make progress in my speech and he will see why I have drawn my conclusions.

The question is this: has the Prime Minister deliberately or recklessly misled the House, sufficient to make a referral to the Privileges Committee? As I said a moment ago, it is important that we treat that question properly, because we should not treat the Committee lightly; we should not mock it. If we made political referrals every time a Member said anything where someone could twist or misconstrue their words, we would always be making referrals.

It seems to me, from listening to the Leader of the Opposition, that there are two principal claims. One is regarding whether due process was followed; the other is regarding pressure. I have been watching the evidence sessions in the Foreign Affairs Committee, as we all have, and I have been listening carefully. We are still awaiting many of the documents, including more than 300 that have been referred to the Intelligence and Security Committee. We are waiting to see what those documents say, but nothing that has come out so far has done anything other than corroborate what the Prime Minister has told us.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
784 c775 
Session
2024-26
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Codes of practice Conduct Diplomatic service Ministers Mandelson, Lord Vetting USA Starmer, Keir Parliamentary privilege Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office Robbins, Olly
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk