Proceeding contribution from Ian Lucas (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 15 May 2018. It occurred during Debate on bill on Data Protection Bill [Lords].
Data Protection Bill [Lords]
I want to say a word about Sir Brian Leveson. The first part of his inquiry was greatly valued and welcomed by all parties. Sir Brian Leveson said that he fundamentally disagreed with the Government’s decision not to proceed with part 2 of the inquiry. We should respect his view, and we should also keep the promise made by both sides of the House to the victims of press intrusion. This is very straightforward, and we should therefore support the Lords amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 641 c184
- Session
- 2017-19
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Data protection Arbitration Ethics Journalism Newspaper press Media Press freedom Regulation Telephone tapping Information Commissioner's Office Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press Inquiry Independent Press Standards Organisation
- Legislation
- Data Protection Bill (HL) 2017-19
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2018-05-17 12:39:50 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-05-15/18051544000130
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-05-15/18051544000130
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-05-15/18051544000130