Proceeding contribution from Andy Slaughter (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 5 March 2018. It occurred during Debate on bill on Data Protection Bill [Lords].
Data Protection Bill [Lords]
My hon. Friend is making excellent work of exposing the Government on this point, but things go a stage further than this. Abandoning Leveson against the wishes of Lord Leveson is a constitutional provocation, because it puts party interest above due process. If that is going to happen with one inquiry, why will it not happen with Grenfell or contaminated blood? What will stop the Government doing things that are in their own interests, not those of victims?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 637 c87
- Session
- 2017-19
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disclosure of information Data protection Data processing Digital technology Immigration Exemptions Personal records Media Press freedom Security Regulation Research Information Commissioner's Office Artificial intelligence Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press Inquiry Independent Monitor for the Press Subject access requests
- Legislation
- Data Protection Bill (HL) 2017-19
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-06-21 10:37:44 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-03-05/18030532000032
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-03-05/18030532000032
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2018-03-05/18030532000032