Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Paul Sweeney (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 13 November 2017. It occurred during e-petition debate on Referendum on Scottish Independence.


Referendum on Scottish Independence

I reject that assertion. The very thing that continues to rend the fabric of the Union is intractable and stupid Toryism, which refuses to do anything to reform the United Kingdom and move it towards the solution that the people of Scotland actually want—intractable towards nationalism, even though it was rejected in the referendum.

The binary nature of that referendum is what truly disrupted the civic discourse in Scotland. Having a yes or no position offered a simplistic answer to a very complex question. That was what was so unsatisfactory about it. I was one of those people who at the early stages of that referendum favoured a third option. That would have opened up the debate in Scotland to a more nuanced discussion about the process of devolution, which, as we recall, Donald Dewar called a process, not an event. The Parliament’s creation was the opportunity to achieve greater ends, but not an end in itself. Having that third question would have offered that opportunity.

Labour is approaching this discussion with a view to how we can improve and build the resilience of the United Kingdom for a better future for all citizens, including those in Scotland. That is not about, for example, where something happens to lie on the piece of rock that is the United Kingdom. It is actually about class identity.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
631 c25WH 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Devolution Referendums Scotland Sovereignty UK membership of EU Brexit
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk