Proceeding contribution from Kit Malthouse (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 22 January 2016. It occurred during Debate on bill on NHS (Charitable Trusts Etc) Bill.
NHS (Charitable Trusts Etc) Bill
My hon. Friend is right. Proposed subsection (2B) in amendment 1 provides that the Secretary of State would be allowed to use the powers only by permission of the House. I am with my hon. Friend in his desire to protect the House’s privileges and powers. I did not get elected to give the Government a free run. When the good people of North West Hampshire elected me, they placed two votes: one for a Government and the other for somebody to hold them account. I will try to do that job. Should the Secretary of State wish to step in, he would have to lay a statutory instrument
before both Houses of Parliament and seek their support. It could not be done easily, on a whim or through a signature on a piece of paper. It would require debate and examination, and need all of us to do our job of scrutiny and reach a settled decision to allow him to step in. I recognise that it is a fundamental step and that an element of separation should be maintained.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 604 c1694
- Session
- 2015-16
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Charities NHS Royalties Trusts Great Ormond Street Hospital
- Legislation
- NHS (Charitable Trusts etc) Bill 2015-16
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-13 15:33:14 +0100
- URI
- http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-22/16012222000270
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-22/16012222000270
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-01-22/16012222000270