Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 23 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].

Company Law Reform Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. 27:"Page 137, line 20, leave out from ““a”” to end of line 22 and insert ““day that is not a working day””" The noble Lord said: My Lords, this is a group of minor technical amendments. The Bill defines a working day in Clause 789. The definition could have been used in Clauses 307, 310 and 624, but was not, so the amendments tidy up the drafting. There is no substantive change. However, I am delighted we have found this error at this late stage. I beg to move. On Question, amendment agreed to. Clause 310 [Notice required of termination of proxy’s authority]:

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c728-9 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Disclosure of information Animal welfare Data protection Audit Accountancy Company law Companies Directors Administration Annual reports Animal experiments Conflict of interests Fraud Finance Freedom of information Liability Information Insolvency Harassment Holding companies Industrial loan stocks Public companies Registration Reform Voting rights Research Shareholders Stock market
Legislation
Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk