1-20 of 164 results for subject:Reprography
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.255 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Reprography
- We searched for
- subject_t:Reprography OR subject_t:Copying OR subject_t:Duplicating OR subject_t:Photocopying OR subject_t:"Reprographic equipment" OR subject_t:Xerography OR subject_ses:92821
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 September (HL10442), whether the Government Art Collection claims any form of copyright, other than Crown Copyright, in digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain, whether or not those reproductions were taken by Government...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 September (HL10442), whether the Government Art Collection claims any form of copyright, other than Crown Copyright, in digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain, whether or not those reproductions were taken by Government...
The Government Art Collection (GAC) does not claim copyright in digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain. The GAC has not sought or received guidance about the assertion of copyright, aside from Crown Copyright. The decision to license images for commercial and non-commercial use through a contractual agreement is an operational decision taken by the GAC, based on commercial contract law for the access and supply of digital assets.
There are no current or scheduled plans for the GAC to allow high-resolution images of works of art that are in the Government Art Collection and in the public domain to be downloaded free of charge for non-commercial use.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 September (HL10442), what guidance they have issued to the Government Art Collection about the assertion of copyright, other than Crown Copyright, over digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 September (HL10442), what guidance they have issued to the Government Art Collection about the assertion of copyright, other than Crown Copyright, over digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain.
The Government Art Collection (GAC) does not claim copyright in digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain. The GAC has not sought or received guidance about the assertion of copyright, aside from Crown Copyright. The decision to license images for commercial and non-commercial use through a contractual agreement is an operational decision taken by the GAC, based on commercial contract law for the access and supply of digital assets.
There are no current or scheduled plans for the GAC to allow high-resolution images of works of art that are in the Government Art Collection and in the public domain to be downloaded free of charge for non-commercial use.
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 September (HL10442), whether the Government Art Collection holds or plans to hold any contractual or licensing rights over digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain; and if so, what is the...
To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Twycross on 17 September (HL10442), whether the Government Art Collection holds or plans to hold any contractual or licensing rights over digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain; and if so, what is the...
The Government Art Collection (GAC) does not claim copyright in digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain. The GAC has not sought or received guidance about the assertion of copyright, aside from Crown Copyright. The decision to license images for commercial and non-commercial use through a contractual agreement is an operational decision taken by the GAC, based on commercial contract law for the access and supply of digital assets.
There are no current or scheduled plans for the GAC to allow high-resolution images of works of art that are in the Government Art Collection and in the public domain to be downloaded free of charge for non-commercial use.
To ask His Majesty's Government what guidance they provide to national museums and galleries about the copyright status of exact digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain.
To ask His Majesty's Government what guidance they provide to national museums and galleries about the copyright status of exact digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain.
According to case law, a work will only be protected by copyright if it is original, in the sense that is the author’s ‘own intellectual creation’. It is questionable whether an unaltered reproduction of an existing work where copyright has expired could satisfy this criterion if there has been no (or very limited) scope for the creator to exercise free creative choices. However, this will depend on the individual facts of the case.
Further guidance is published on GOV.UK in an Intellectual Property Office copyright notice on digital images, photographs and the internet.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of how national museums and galleries treat the copyright status of exact digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain.
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of how national museums and galleries treat the copyright status of exact digital reproductions of two-dimensional artworks that are in the public domain.
According to case law, a work will only be protected by copyright if it is original, in the sense that is the author’s ‘own intellectual creation’. It is questionable whether an unaltered reproduction of an existing work where copyright has expired could satisfy this criterion if there has been no (or very limited) scope for the creator to exercise free creative choices. However, this will depend on the individual facts of the case.
The Government has made no assessment of how cultural heritage institutions treat the copyright status of such reproductions in practice.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will provide in cash terms the value of the charge levied upon visa and settlement applicants for having documents (a) scanned and (b) photocopied by his Department.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will provide in cash terms the value of the charge levied upon visa and settlement applicants for having documents (a) scanned and (b) photocopied by his Department.
There is no charge by the Home Office levied upon visa and settlement applicants for having documents (a) scanned and (b) photocopied
The vast majority of UKVI customers applying online have the option of uploading their supporting evidence themselves, for free. If customers choose not to use this self-upload function, then they have the option to have their documents scanned by the commercial partner at the visa application centre or service point when they attend their appointment. In most locations an additional charge is applicable for this service.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what steps she is taking to ensure that government departments adhere to licensing requirements related to the scanning and photocopying of documents where secondary royalties may be due to the author or creator of such documents.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what steps she is taking to ensure that government departments adhere to licensing requirements related to the scanning and photocopying of documents where secondary royalties may be due to the author or creator of such documents.
The Cabinet Office currently coordinates the purchase of a cross-Government licence on behalf of Departments, however each department is responsible for its own licensing adherence.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, whether her Department is responsible for ensuring that government departments adhere to licensing requirements related to the scanning and photocopying of documents where secondary royalties may be due to the author or creator of such documents.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, whether her Department is responsible for ensuring that government departments adhere to licensing requirements related to the scanning and photocopying of documents where secondary royalties may be due to the author or creator of such documents.
The Cabinet Office currently coordinates the purchase of a cross-Government licence on behalf of Departments, however each department is responsible for its own licensing adherence.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether staff in government departments are covered by copyright licences related to the scanning and photocopying of documents where secondary royalties may be due to the author or creator of such documents.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether staff in government departments are covered by copyright licences related to the scanning and photocopying of documents where secondary royalties may be due to the author or creator of such documents.
Staff in government departments are covered by copyright licences related to the scanning and photocopying of documents where secondary royalties may be due to the author or creator of such documents.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 2 February 2015 to Question 222099, what the amount spent was on each instance of reprographic expenditure totalling more than £10,000 in 2013-14.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 2 February 2015 to Question 222099, what the amount spent was on each instance of reprographic expenditure totalling more than £10,000 in 2013-14.
The amount spent on separately identifiable instances of reprographic expenditure totalling more than £10,000 in 2013-14 are listed in the table below:
Reasons | Expenditure totalling more than £10,000 |
Items |
£'000 |
DVLA reprographic costs â specialist printing undertaken. | 7,521 |
Printing of the Environmental Statement and Environmental consultation costs | 886 |
British Transport Police costs relating to reusable CDs & USB sticks being used for policing purposes. Such items are charged to this account code along with reprographics. | 655 |
Certificates issued to sea-men as proof of necessary qualifications. These have to be specially printed to prevent forgery. | 180 |
Franking machine to cover postage of mass updated copies of car fuel consumption guide, print copies and manuals and technical reports. | 107 |
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how much the NHS spent on the lease of photocopier machines in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how much the NHS spent on the lease of photocopier machines in each of the last five years.
Information in respect of National Health Service spending on the lease of photocopier machines is not separately collected by the Department and as such we are unable to provide this data. However, within the context of administrative costs it should be noted that we are on target to reduce the costs of bureaucracy in the NHS by a third since 2010, with savings of £1.5 billion available for re-investment in front line services every year from 2014. In this Parliament alone, at least £6.4 billion will be saved through lower administrative costs and will be available for re-investment in front line patient services.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 26 January 2015 to Question 221267, what the reasons were for each instance of reprographic expenditure totalling more than £10,000 in 2013-14.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 26 January 2015 to Question 221267, what the reasons were for each instance of reprographic expenditure totalling more than £10,000 in 2013-14.
The reasons for each instance of reprographic expenditure totalling more than £10,000 in 2013-14 are listed in the table below; however note that the account codes used for reprographic costs by some agencies include a range of expenditure types beyond strictly reprographic costs.
Reasons | |
Items | |
Costs relate to reusable CDs & USB sticks being used for policing purposes. Such items are charged to this account code along with reprographics. | |
Franking machine (1) to cover postage of mass updated copies of car fuel consumption guide (2) print 105,000 copies of car fuel consumption guide costing £16,275 and (3) manuals and technical reports. | |
DVLA's reprographic costs â specialist printing undertaken by the Agency | |
Certificates issued to sea-men by Maritime and Coastguard Agency as proof of necessary qualifications. These have to be specially printed to prevent forgery. | |
Printing of the Environmental Statement and HS2 Environmental consultation costs |
Motions to consider. Agreed to on question.
Motions to consider. Agreed to on question.
I. Letter dated 27/03/2014 from David Willetts MP to Dai Harvard MP and Andrew Turner MP regarding grouping of statutory instruments on copyright exceptions. II. Associated documents including a "mark up" of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to show the proposed changes, the Government response to the technical review, and guidance documents for business and consumers. 11 docs.
I. Letter dated 27/03/2014 from David Willetts MP to Dai Harvard MP and Andrew Turner MP regarding grouping of statutory instruments on copyright exceptions. II. Associated documents including a "mark up" of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to show the proposed changes, the Government response to the technical...
I. Letter dated 17/12/2013 from Viscount Younger of Leckie to Baroness Buscombe and other Members regarding the copyright exceptions debate on 5 December. 1 p. II. Annex A: answers to points raised during the debate. 9 p.
I. Letter dated 17/12/2013 from Viscount Younger of Leckie to Baroness Buscombe and other Members regarding the copyright exceptions debate on 5 December. 1 p. II. Annex A: answers to points raised during the debate. 9 p.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what was (1) the total expenditure, excluding value added tax, on photocopier paper, and (2) the average purchase price, excluding value added tax, of a 500-sheet ream of white A4 80gsm photocopier paper, by (a) the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and (b)...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what was (1) the total expenditure, excluding value added tax, on photocopier paper, and (2) the average purchase price, excluding value added tax, of a 500-sheet ream of white A4 80gsm photocopier paper, by (a) the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and (b)...
Expenditure is set out in the table below. Figures exclude VAT.
| Body | Period
Covered | Expenditure
on Photocopier Paper
(£) | Average
Price per Ream
(£) |
| Core
Defra | 01.11.2011-31.10.2012 | 67,873 | 2.34 |
| Food
and Environment Research
Agency | 31.10.2011-31.10.2012 | 11,808 | 2.46 |
| Centre
for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture
Science | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 1,978 | 2.35 |
| Animal
Health and Veterinary Laboratory
Agency | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 57,404 | 2.26 |
| Rural
Payments
Agency | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 78,820 | 2.28 |
| Veterinary
Medicines
Directorate | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 4,100 | 2.47 |
The RPA and AHVLA used two suppliers during the course of the 2011-12 financial year. The average price per ream for these two bodies reflects the price charged by the current supplier.
Periods covered vary according to the latest available information for each organisation.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what was the total expenditure on photocopier paper, excluding value added tax, in the latest year for which figures are available, by (1) the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and (2) each of its executive agencies; and what was the average purchase...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what was the total expenditure on photocopier paper, excluding value added tax, in the latest year for which figures are available, by (1) the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and (2) each of its executive agencies; and what was the average purchase...
Expenditure is set out in the table below. Figures exclude VAT.
| Body | Period
Covered | Expenditure
on Photocopier Paper
(£) | Average
Price per Ream
(£) |
| Core
Defra | 01.11.2011-31.10.2012 | 67,873 | 2.34 |
| Food
and Environment Research
Agency | 31.10.2011-31.10.2012 | 11,808 | 2.46 |
| Centre
for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture
Science | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 1,978 | 2.35 |
| Animal
Health and Veterinary Laboratory
Agency | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 57,404 | 2.26 |
| Rural
Payments
Agency | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 78,820 | 2.28 |
| Veterinary
Medicines
Directorate | 01.04.2011-31.03.2012 | 4,100 | 2.47 |
The RPA and AHVLA used two suppliers during the course of the 2011-12 financial year. The average price per ream for these two bodies reflects the price charged by the current supplier.
Periods covered vary according to the latest available information for each organisation.
Letter dated 06/04/2010 from Lynn Rattigan, Acting Executive Officer, to Lord Bates regarding photocopier paper purchased by the Royal Armouries. 1 p.
Letter dated 06/04/2010 from Lynn Rattigan, Acting Executive Officer, to Lord Bates regarding photocopier paper purchased by the Royal Armouries. 1 p.
To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission what the average purchase price, excluding value added tax was of a 500 sheet ream of white A4 photocopier paper for use in the House of Commons; and how much the House of Commons Commission spent...
To ask the hon. Member for North Devon, representing the House of Commons Commission what the average purchase price, excluding value added tax was of a 500 sheet ream of white A4 photocopier paper for use in the House of Commons; and how much the House of Commons Commission spent...
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what the yearly running costs, excluding value added tax and including service fees and rental costs, of a photocopier in her Department were in the latest year for which information is available.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what the yearly running costs, excluding value added tax and including service fees and rental costs, of a photocopier in her Department were in the latest year for which information is available.