Skip to main content

1-20 of 5,326 results for subject:Discharges

Type

-
Early day motions (3)
+ Legislation (41) + Acts (3)
-
Public acts (3)
+ Bills (9) + Public bills (9)
-
Government bills (3)
+ Private members' bills (6)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (2)
-
Ten minute rule bills (4)
+ Delegated legislation (29)
-
Statutory instruments (29)
+ Members' contributions (2,782)
-
Business questions (11)
-
Maiden speeches (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (258)
-
Oral question time interventions (10)
+ Oral questions (263)
-
Prime Minister's questions (10)
-
Topical questions (15)
-
Points of order (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (2,251)
+ Parliamentary committees (88) + Committee proceedings (54)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (9)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (23)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (13)
-
Select Committee reports (15)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (7)
-
Select Committee written evidence (14)
+ Parliamentary papers (166)
-
Annual reports (1)
-
Command papers (9)
-
Consultation papers (2)
-
Deposited papers (112)
-
House of Commons papers (35)
-
House of Lords papers (3)
-
Impact assessments (5)
-
Unprinted command papers (2)
-
Unprinted papers (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (222) + Debates (137)
-
Adjournment debates (21)
-
Backbench debates (2)
+ Committee proceedings (54)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (9)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (2)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (23)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (13)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (78)
-
Debates on bills (69)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (9)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
-
Opposition days (3)
-
Questions for short debate (7)
+ Statements (77) + Oral statements (24)
-
Ministerial statements (22)
-
Written statements (53)
-
Urgent questions (1)
+ Written corrections (2)
-
Ministerial corrections (2)
+ Parliamentary questions (2,376)
-
Business questions (11)
+ Oral questions (263)
-
Prime Minister's questions (10)
-
Topical questions (15)
-
Urgent questions (1)
-
Written questions (2,101)
+ Research briefings (17)
-
Commons Briefing papers (11)
-
Commons Debate packs (5)
+ Lords Library Briefings (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many patients detained under Part III of the Mental Health Act 1983 were discharged from hospital in the most recent 12 months for which data is available, broken down by section.

Asked by
Neil O'Brien (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 September 2026
Reference
26615
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of Discharge‑to‑Assess pathways into intermediate care services in the South East; and what steps she is taking to prevent delays for patients awaiting transfer from hospital for rehabilitation.

Asked by
Jess Brown-Fuller (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 September 2026
Reference
28208
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if she will publish a breakdown of the top 10 recorded causes for delayed discharge by total number of bed days lost, using the National Codes set out in the NHS Data Model and Dictionary (a) in England and...

Asked by
Steve Barclay (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
15 September 2026
Reference
29928
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the Restricted Patients Statistics, England and Wales 2025, published 30 April 2026, what the mean and median length of time is between a patient becoming subject to a hospital order with restrictions under sections 37 and 41 of the...

Asked by
Neil O'Brien (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 September 2026
Reference
28017
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of the number of NHS hospital beds currently occupied by patients who are medically fit for discharge because appropriate social care provision is unavailable.

Asked by
Lord Blackwater (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 September 2026
Reference
HL2634
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage second day. Schedule 6 agreed to. Clauses 39 to 46 agreed to. Schedule 7 agreed to. Clauses 47 to 56 agreed to. Bill reported with amendments (HL Bill 50). (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Coaker
Answering member
Baroness Goldie; Earl of Minto
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc645-700
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord De Mauley

48: Schedule 6, page 134, line 22, leave out paragraph 4

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment would ensure non executive board members remain unpaid and therefore genuinely committed to the reserves and cadets.

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c645
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendments 48, 50, 51 and 52 in my name.

Amendment 48 is about payment to the new non-executive board members. The members of the RFCAs and all their forebear organisations, commencing with the county territorial associations in 1908, whether acting locally or nationally, have never...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc645-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I added my name to these amendments, and I agree with the points that have been so well made by the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley. I will start my brief remarks by making just a couple of general points. First, while there have been some criticisms of...

Member
Lord Stirrup (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc647-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, again, I should like to say a few words in support of my noble friend Lord De Mauley, and in particular to reinforce everything he said about Amendments 50 and 51. On Amendment 51, I will say no more than that it plays into the issues I was...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc648-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 50 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, and other noble Lords, which seeks to ensure that lords-lieutenants’ involvement as presidents of regional RFCA councils remains enshrined in primary legislation. I support the comments just made by the noble Earl, Lord Howe.

I...

Member
Lord Dannatt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc649-650
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too support the amendments in the name of my noble friend Lord De Mauley. I say from the outset that I do not oppose reform in principle and I did not put my name to the notices to oppose Clause 38 or Schedule 6 standing part, which...

Member
Lord Harlech (Conservative; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc650-1
House
House of Lords

I am pleased to add my name to this suite of amendments that cover a broad area. On Amendment 48, I am sure that any of us who have served as Ministers or council leaders will have appointed loads of people to different bodies over the years. One thing I...

Member
Lord Empey (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc651-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to the amendments to which I have attached my name. As the noble Lord, Lord Empey, pointed out, this is a reasonable set of amendments. Again, they speak to issues around the Reserve Forces’ and Cadets’ Associations; in many ways, they could have been part...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc652-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, much has been said by noble Lords, noble and gallant Lords, me and my noble friend Lord De Mauley about the importance of the continuation of the voluntary nature of the RFCAs. This is not because I wish to sound like a stuck record; it is out of...

Member
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc653-4
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, for the amendments whose presentation to us he led on.

I say to the noble Lord, Lord Empey, as I have said on a number of occasions both to the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, and to the Committee as a whole, that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c654
House
House of Lords

I suggest, in answer to that point from the Minister, that what it does is call into question their independence from their MoD masters.

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c654
House
House of Lords

That might be a matter for us to consider in the conversation that we have. I do not want to go on for too long, but I understand many of the comments that different people have made this evening; I agree with some of them to a larger or lesser...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c654
House
House of Lords

The Minister has said that he does not believe that having paid non-executive directors will lessen their commitment. That is not the question, though. Surely the question is: does having unpaid representatives lessen their commitment? It does not. So why do we want to change it?

Member
Lord Stirrup (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c654
House
House of Lords

That is the difference. I understand the whole point about the voluntary ethos generally across the reserves and cadet associations; I absolutely accept that. I am saying, with respect to the board members, that, where you are creating a national board

that wants to take on certain statutory functions, that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc654-7
House
House of Lords