Skip to main content

1-20 of 3,073 results for subject:Curfews

Type

-
Early day motions (1)
+ Legislation (15) + Acts (4)
-
Public acts (4)
+ Bills (4) + Public bills (4)
-
Government bills (3)
+ Private members' bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (7)
-
Statutory instruments (7)
+ Members' contributions (2,358)
-
Business questions (2)
-
Maiden speeches (4)
-
Oral answers to questions (43)
-
Oral question time interventions (1)
+ Oral questions (46)
-
Prime Minister's questions (6)
-
Topical questions (3)
-
Proceeding contributions (2,268)
+ Parliamentary committees (51) + Committee proceedings (36)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (14)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (18)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Select Committee reports (5)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
-
Select Committee written evidence (10)
+ Parliamentary papers (73)
-
Command papers (9)
-
Consultation papers (5)
-
Deposited papers (54)
-
House of Commons papers (6)
-
House of Lords papers (3)
-
Impact assessments (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (97) + Debates (68)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (36)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (14)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (18)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
+ Legislative debates (59)
-
Debates on bills (51)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (8)
+ Monarch's speech debates (3)
-
King's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (2)
-
Opposition days (1)
+ Statements (28) + Oral statements (19)
-
Ministerial statements (19)
-
Written statements (9)
+ Written corrections (1)
-
Ministerial corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (563)
-
Business questions (2)
+ Oral questions (46)
-
Prime Minister's questions (6)
-
Topical questions (3)
-
Written questions (515)
+ Research briefings (8) + Commons Briefing papers (7)
-
Briefing papers on bills (3)
-
Commons Debate packs (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what assessment his Department has made of the potential implications for its policies of reports of internet and communications shutdowns and curfews in parts of Balochistan, including Nushki, Mashkay, Zehri, Mastung and Mangochar.

Asked by
John McDonnell (Labour)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
19792
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether residents of asylum accommodation on Ministry of Defence sites are subject to any formal curfew or restrictions on hours of entry and exit.

Asked by
Rupert Lowe (Restore Britain)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 July 2026
Reference
14600
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Justice Committee
Date
19 May 2026
Reference
HC 194 2026-27
House
House of Commons

The Government are committed to reforming the Child Maintenance Service to get more money to children by removing direct pay to combat hidden non-compliance, streamlining enforcement by introducing administrative liability orders and improving our most serious enforcement measures. That said, there are currently no plans to introduce curfew measures; doing so would require amendments to primary legislation and raise significant safeguarding concerns for paying parents and those who live with them.

Answered by
Andrew Western (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c561
House
House of Commons

Every year, millions of pounds of child maintenance go unspent, not including deductions for money hidden away and parents who pretend they cannot work. As far as I am concerned, if someone has children and they can pay towards their maintenance, they absolutely should. Enforcement is not working, because the Government treat it like an unpaid utility bill rather than a moral obligation that people have towards their children. I would like the Minister to revisit his suggestion that the Government would need primary legislation to use curfew orders, as that is not my understanding. If all the other measures are not working, why should someone who does not pay for their own children be able to go out on the lash on a Friday and Saturday night when the Government can stop that happening?

Asked by
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c561
House
House of Commons

I will handle that question with care, Mr Speaker. [Laughter.] I know that the hon. Gentleman has been consistent on this matter for a very long time. A range of serious enforcement powers are already available to the Department, including disqualification from driving, removal of a passport, taking control of people’s goods and even, in some cases, commitment to prison, but very serious safeguarding concerns can arise as a result of the use of curfew orders; in one very tragic case recently, an individual subject to a curfew order murdered members of his family. On the hon. Gentleman’s specific question as to whether use of the orders requires primary legislation, I will follow up in writing to confirm that or otherwise.

Answered by
Andrew Western (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c562
House
House of Commons

Whether he plans to introduce curfew orders for parents who are non-compliant with child maintenance payments.

Asked by
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
908845; 784 cc561-2
House
House of Commons

Fireworks are used in private celebrations and traditional events. This briefing outlines the current regulation of the sale, possession and use of fireworks.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
SN05704

Lords committee stage third day. Clause 28, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 29 to 35 agreed to. Clause 36, as amended, agreed to. New clause agreed to. Clauses 37 to 39 agreed to. (Part 1 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Hanson of Flint; Baroness Levitt; Lord Katz
Answering member
Lord Sandhurst; Lord Davies of Gower
Department
Home Office; Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Notes
Northern Ireland legislative consent granted, Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
850 cc818-884
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Hanson of Flint

57: Clause 28, page 32, line 7, leave out “6” and insert “12”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment increases the maximum term of imprisonment on summary conviction in Scotland for an offence under section 141(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
850 c818
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is the first in a number of groups of government amendments. I apologise for the large number of amendments before the Committee today. Their core aim is to apply various additional provisions in the Bill to Scotland and/or Northern Ireland. They reflect the outcome of further engagement...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
850 cc819-821
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to ask on a point of information and declare an interest: I chair the National Proof of Age Standards Scheme board. In the list of identifications for proof of age purposes, I did not hear the noble Lord say that the PASS card was acceptable. It...

Member
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
850 c821
House
House of Lords

I think I can say yes to both those points. If I cannot, I shall revert to her shortly.

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
850 c821
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on these Benches, we support the intent behind this blizzard of government amendments. Of course, as the Minister says, the effect of these amendments and other consequential changes is to apply tougher maximum penalties and provisions relating to offensive weapons in Scotland and, in certain cases, Northern Ireland.

It...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
850 cc821-2
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the noble Lord’s comments, which I will respond to in a moment, but it is important that I clarify the point referred to by the noble Baroness, Lady McIntosh. I was half right. The answer “yes” is to the question of passports; it is correct that...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
850 c822
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this group essentially encompasses several different groups of amendments; perhaps they should have been separated, but we are where we are. Two of those groups within this very large group are, I would argue, quite uncontroversial. I have absolutely no issue with the Government increasing the maximum penalties...

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
850 cc822-3
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Davies, and I am genuinely sorry. I understand where he is coming from, and I am grateful to him and the Opposition Whips’ Office for giving notification that they would have concerns over those matters, but I am sorry that he has...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
850 cc823-4
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, I thank him for what he said. I am slightly baffled. There is no Bench more strongly against compulsory digital ID than the Liberal Democrat Benches, so I find the Minister’s assurance that the analogue form of identity will continue—and digital ID in this instance,...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
850 c824
House
House of Lords

Will the noble Lord respond on the mandatory conditions on the digital proof-of-age pass, which he confirmed would be published before December?

Member
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
850 c824
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I cannot give the noble Baroness a date at the moment, but I will reflect on that with colleagues and return to her, because there are a number of other departmental interests as well.

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
850 c824
House
House of Lords