Skip to main content

1-20 of 71 results for subject:"Defence Quality Assurance Directorate"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What assessment he has made of the future metrology needs of each business section of the Defence Research Agency & various other questions on Defence Research Agency & sale of mechanical metrology laboratory in Woolwich. - Inc text of letters from Mr J Chisholm of the Defence Research Agency.

Asked by
John Austin (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 May 1993
Reference
225 c265-8W;225 c263-5W
House
House of Commons

When it is proposed to establish the Directorate General Test and Evaluation as an Agency; and if he has considered incorporating the present Directorate of Quality Assurance and Technical Support's Mechanical Metrology Laboratory within the proposed Agency.

Asked by
John Austin (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 May 1993
Reference
225 c268W;225 c265-6W
House
House of Commons

What are the employment implications, in terms of jobs lost, gross and net, of the decision to merge the quality assurance laboratory at Woolwich with the Defence Research Agency near Farnborough and to close the outstations at Bromley, Bridgewater and Manchester; and if he will give details for each of...

Asked by
Gerald Kaufman (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 1992
Reference
203 c402W
House
House of Commons

Statement on future of quality assurance laboratory services. - Includes figures.

Asked by
Tim Devlin (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 February 1992
Reference
203 c152-3W
House
House of Commons

When he expects to reach a decision about the future of the Directorate General of Defence Quality Assurance; and how many of the staff currently employed at Woolwich will be offered posts after the re-organisation.

Asked by
John Cartwright (Independent SDP)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 January 1992
Reference
202 c454W
House
House of Commons

What consideration has been given to the relocation of the Quality Assurance Unit to Stockton.

Asked by
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 1991
Reference
200 c547W;200 c545W
House
House of Commons

That this House views with dismay the continued indecision of the Ministry of Defence in relation to the relocation of the DGDQA facility from Woolwich to Stockton-on-Tees and its continued failure to honour its previous commitment to such dispersal made in March 1989; regrets that other departmental relocations have been...

Primary sponsor
Ashok Kumar (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
12 November 1991
Reference
126; 126A1; 126A2
House
House of Commons

What will be the impact on the future staffing of the Directorate General of Defence Quality Assurance of his Department's decision to rely on NACCB certification rather than carrying out its own routine assessments of potential contractors. - Includes figures.

Asked by
John Cartwright (Independent SDP)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 July 1991
Reference
195 c309W;195 c306-7W
House
House of Commons
If he will comment on the future of directorate general of quality assurance.
Asked by
Tim Devlin (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
2 July 1991
Reference
194 c153-4
House
House of Commons
To comment on the future of the directorate general of quality assurance and the outcome of the study into relocating this to Portland.
Asked by
Ian Bruce (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
2 July 1991
Reference
194 c153-4
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Kenneth Carlisle (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 July 1991
Reference
194 c153-4
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Kenneth Carlisle (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 July 1991
Reference
194 c153-4
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on possible re-location to Teeside.
Asked by
Tim Devlin (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 July 1991
Reference
194 c153-4
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Kenneth Carlisle (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 July 1991
Reference
194 c153-4
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Kenneth Carlisle (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 July 1991
Reference
194 c153-4
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on same.
Asked by
Ian Bruce (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 July 1991
Reference
194 c153-4
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Kenneth Carlisle (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 July 1991
Reference
194 c154
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on re-location of Directorate General of Quality Assurance & staff at Woolwich.
Asked by
John Cartwright (Independent SDP)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 July 1991
Reference
194 c154
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Kenneth Carlisle (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 July 1991
Reference
194 c154
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on relocation of Directorate General of Quality Assurance to Teeside.
Asked by
Frank Cook (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 July 1991
Reference
194 c154
House
House of Commons