Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,748 results for subject:"Common law"

Type

+ Legislation (2) + Bills (1) + Public bills (1) + Private members' bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (1)
-
Statutory instruments (1)
+ Members' contributions (1,638)
-
Maiden speeches (1)
-
Oral answers to questions (5)
-
Oral questions (5)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,628)
+ Parliamentary committees (24) + Committee proceedings (19)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (3)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (6)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (8)
-
Second Reading Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee reports (3)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
-
Select Committee written evidence (1)
+ Parliamentary papers (20)
-
Annual reports (4)
-
Command papers (2)
-
Consultation papers (1)
-
Deposited papers (5)
-
House of Commons papers (12)
-
House of Lords papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (36) + Debates (30)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (19)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (3)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (6)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (8)
-
Second Reading Committee proceedings (1)
-
Debates on select committee reports (2)
+ Legislative debates (27)
-
Debates on bills (26)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
+ Statements (6) + Oral statements (2)
-
Ministerial statements (2)
-
Written statements (4)
+ Parliamentary questions (53)
-
Oral questions (5)
-
Written questions (48)
+ Research briefings (3)
-
Commons Briefing papers (2)
+ Lords Library Briefings (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when he plans to launch a consultation on cohabitation law reform.

Asked by
Catherine West (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 June 2026
Reference
5987
House
House of Commons

Committee stage. Clauses 1 and 2 agreed to. Bill reported without amendment. Third reading. Agreed to on question. Bill passed.

Lead member
Sarah Sackman
Answering member
Kieran Mullan
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HC); Debates on bills
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
775 cc807-812
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under you, Madam Chair.

I am pleased to open this discussion on the clauses of a focused but important Bill, designed to drive innovation, enhance legal certainty, and strengthen our standing in the global digital economy. Let me turn first to clause 1—an unassuming clause...

Member
Sarah Sackman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
775 cc807-8
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to speak again on behalf of the Opposition as we carry forward the constructive debate that we had on Second Reading.

Let me restate from the outset our support for the Bill, which represents a careful, modest step in the right direction, and preserves the inherent flexibility of...

Member
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
775 cc808-9
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to speak once again in this Chamber on the Property (Digital Assets etc) Bill, which creates a modern legal framework that will allow Britain to take every opportunity we can while protecting ourselves in an ever-changing digital age.

The Liberal Democrats support clause 1. It states that...

Member
Will Forster (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
775 cc809-810
House
House of Commons

With the leave of the Committee, I give my sincere thanks to the hon. Members for Bexhill and Battle (Dr Mullan) and for Woking (Mr Forster). It has been a pleasure to discuss the clauses in more detail, and it is good to see constructive consensus about a piece of...

Member
Sarah Sackman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
775 cc810-1
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read the Third time.

Let me I start by reiterating my sincere thanks to Members of this House and the other place for their support and insightful contributions. I am particularly grateful for the support expressed on Second Reading by the hon....

Member
Sarah Sackman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
775 c811
House
House of Commons

I rise simply to put on the record my thanks, particularly to the Bill Committee and to the Law Commission for its diligence. Yet again we see the great benefit that our state machinery and apparatus as whole derive from having the Law Commission. I have nothing further to add.

2.34...

Member
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
775 cc811-2
House
House of Commons

I thank colleagues from across the House. It is a good example of cross-party working, delivering a Bill that has been well-scrutinised and is fit for purpose. In that spirit, I hope that the Minister can take that away and encourage her colleagues to do the same with other legislation.

Question...

Member
Will Forster (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2025
Reference
775 c812
House
House of Commons

Lords report stage. Amendment 6 agreed to. Bill, as amended, ordered to be printed (HL Bill 98).

Lead member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede
Answering member
Lord Sandhurst
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Northern Ireland legislative consent granted.
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
845 cc1288-1298
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Holmes of Richmond

1: Clause 1, page 1, line 5, leave out “a thing in” and insert “capable of”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment, connected to another in the name of Lord Holmes of Richmond, seeks to provide a statutory basis for recognising digital assets as property, while removing any presumption...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
845 c1288
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 1, in my name, I will speak to Amendments 2 and 3 in this group.

It is a pleasure to open Report of the Property (Digital Assets etc) Bill. In doing so, I declare my technology interests as set out in the register, not least as...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
845 cc1288-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am a great admirer of the noble Lord, Lord Holmes, and his passion for all things digital. But this is a good yet very modest Bill, and I not sure that we need stress-testing at this point in the proceedings. Through the Special Public Bill process that...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
845 cc1289-1290
House
House of Lords

My Lords, traditionally, English common law has recognised two forms of property: tangible things in possession and intangible things in action, such as debts and shares. However, as we have heard, with the rise of digital assets such as crypto- currencies, tokens and non-fungible tokens we encounter items that do...

Member
Lord Sandhurst (Crossbench; Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
845 cc1290-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Holmes, for raising these issues. They get to the heart of the Bill: whether there is a need to recognise a further category in statute, and whether it is helpful to provide further guidance to the courts on the attributes to consider.

On...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour; Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
845 cc1291-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who participated in this short debate. I say particularly to my friend, the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones: disappointing? Never. The whole purpose of tabling these amendments has been set out eloquently through the debate and what I was seeking to achieve was to...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
845 c1293
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Holmes of Richmond

4: After Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—

“Review: impact of digital assets being treated as property by virtue of this Act

(1) On the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must publish an economic impact assessment of digital assets being treated...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
845 c1293
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 4 I will speak also to Amendment 5 in my name. I will be very brief with these because I accept that they go some way beyond the central thrust of the Bill.

My main reason for bringing these amendments back on Report is to make...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
845 cc1293-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, rather like the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, I am afraid I am also going to disappoint the noble Lord, Lord Holmes, because I do not think these amendments are necessary. But I agree with many of the things he said, especially about the evidence that we received. I...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
845 c1294
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I can be extremely brief because I agree with much of what the noble Viscount, Lord Stansgate, has had to say. The noble Lord, Lord Holmes, is nothing if not consistent. We had data centres brought up in the Data (Use and Access) Bill and in this Bill,...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
845 cc1294-5
House
House of Lords