Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,092 results for subject:"Agricultural Wages Board"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether he plans to restore the Agricultural Workers’ Board.

Asked by
Jayne Kirkham (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 September 2025
Reference
72729
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what recent assessment she has made of the effect of the abolition of the Agricultural Wages Board on agricultural workers' wages.

Asked by
Dan Carden (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 July 2023
Reference
191419
House
House of Commons

Examination of witnesses. Written evidence reported.

Lead member
George Eustice
Answering member
Daniel Zeichner
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Agriculture Bill Committee
Date
13 February 2020
House
House of Commons

New clause 16 (Environmental targets and objectives), discussed with new clause 17 (Primacy of public purposes), new clause 19 (Financial assistance: duty to provide advice), and new clause 27 (Smallholdings estates: land management), debated and negatived on division (7 votes to 9). New clause 18 (Consultation on administration) debated and...

Lead member
George Eustice
Answering member
David Drew
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Agriculture Bill Committee
Date
20 November 2018
House
House of Commons

Amendment to clause 11 negatived on division. Government amendment made to clause 11. Clause 11 agreed to as amended. Clauses 12 to 16 agreed to. Clause 17 under consideration when Committee adjourned.

Lead member
George Eustice
Answering member
David Drew
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Agriculture Bill Committee
Date
13 November 2018
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether she has made an assessment of the effect of the abolition of the Agricultural Wages Board in 2013 on the proportion of migrants working in the agricultural sector; and if she will make a statement.

Asked by
Gareth Thomas (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 July 2016
Reference
41688
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what statistics are made publicly available on agricultural wages since the abolition of the Agricultural Wages Board.

Asked by
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 November 2015
Reference
HL3008
House
House of Lords

The hon. Gentleman knows full well that that the devolution settlement is a complicated one, and that it was entirely right for the UK Government to seek clarity from the Supreme Court on this issue. We welcome the fact that the Supreme Court has given its ruling and provided the clarification we needed.

Answered by
Stephen Crabb (Conservative)
Answering body
Wales Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 July 2014
Reference
584 c279
House
House of Commons

Agriculture is a significant employment sector in Wales, and many people, including the Farmers Union of Wales, wanted the Agricultural Wages Board to be protected. Will the Minister say why he has twice challenged it in the High Court and in the Supreme Court, and how much that has cost the public and the taxpayer?

Asked by
Huw Irranca-Davies (Labour)
Answering body
Wales Office
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 July 2014
Reference
584 cc279-280
House
House of Commons

I always worry about iconoclasm. There have been certain ages in our history when it has played an interesting role. Perhaps Members should embark on a tour immediately to explain to people out there how important these concepts are to the health of our democracy. I think we all agree...

Member
Angela Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 May 2014
Reference
580 cc324-5
House
House of Commons

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord De Mauley
Answering member
Lord Knight of Weymouth
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
22 July 2013
Reference
747 cc387-396GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government are committed to providing an environment for all sectors of the economy in which private enterprise and businesses can flourish. A key objective is to simplify employment legislation and remove unnecessary burdens from businesses. As part of this, the Government have taken forward legislation through the...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2013
Reference
747 cc387-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, might be pleased to hear that I will not remove my jacket.

I have vehemently opposed the whole principle of the agricultural wages board. I am not in essence opposing the provision today because, as the noble Lord said, it is a logical...

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2013
Reference
747 cc389-391GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as we have heard from my noble friend, we are returning to what is, for us on this side of the Committee, the vexed question of the abolition of the agricultural wages board, which we have consistently opposed. In opening, the Minister implied that the agricultural wages board...

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2013
Reference
747 cc390-3GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lords, Lord Whitty and Lord Knight, for their contributions. As I said earlier, the amendments we are proposing to the Working Time Regulations are necessary technical amendments to the legislation as a result of the end of the agricultural minimum wage regulatory regime on 1 October,...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2013
Reference
747 cc392-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2013
Reference
747 c394GC
House
House of Lords

I am now coming on to some of the other points. Perhaps I may proceed, and if I do not cover them the noble Lord can intervene then. Would he like me to try?

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2013
Reference
747 c394GC
House
House of Lords

Yes.

4 pm

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2013
Reference
747 c394GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord effectively asked why we do not wait to press ahead until all this has been resolved. We will not know the outcome of the Welsh position for some time, but we need certainty for people in employment in farming in the mean time. If we did not...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2013
Reference
747 c394GC
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister moves off Wales completely, I would be grateful to know whether he considered the order applying just to England, so that we would not have this issue. Given that detailed conversations were going on with Ministers in the Welsh Assembly Government, was that an option?

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2013
Reference
747 c394GC
House
House of Lords