Skip to main content

1-20 of 122 results for primarymember:"Lord Grenfell"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, the noble Lord would say that, wouldn’t he?

Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 January 2014
Reference
751 c343
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the noble Lord not agree that it would be a pity for efforts to teach foreign languages to be motivated by purely commercial interests? Trying to get people to be better business representatives abroad is surely not the only reason. Many of the people who are learning foreign languages find that in other countries they speak English anyway, and put us to shame. Would it not be a great shame if future generations did not at least have the ability to read some of the world’s great literature in its original language?

Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2013
Reference
748 c354
House
House of Lords

My Lords, like the noble Lord, Lord James, I would certainly like to see the 306 more widely memorialised around the country, but that is best left to the churches and local communities rather than to the Government. Would the Minister join me in paying tribute to my noble friend Lord Browne of Ladyton, who five years ago next month, against much opposition, as the newly appointed Secretary of Defence, sought and obtained a pardon for the 306? That has brought great comfort to the families. I know that there is a principle of other times and other customs, but this was long overdue. It took great courage to do, and I salute him for it.

Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 July 2013
Reference
747 c870
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I spent some years living in the United States. I was always struck there by the efficacy of the system that they have, in which where contributions to charities are fully deductible. The US Treasury seems to have worked out that the more that is given by individuals, the less the eventual burden on the taxpayers because they are taking up a lot of the strain from the taxpayers. This not rocket science. Successive Governments here never seem to look at this as a serious proposition. Why not?

Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 2012
Reference
741 c1059
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is the Prime Minister, in dismissing out of hand the European Court of Human Rights’ ruling on voting rights for prisoners, not giving aid and comfort to members of the Council of Europe like Russia that see fit to pick and choose which of the undertakings they made when joining the Council they wish to honour?

Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2012
Reference
740 c499
House
House of Lords

My Lords, will the Minister accept a mild rebuke from me on the pronunciation of the names of French Presidents? I declare an interest. It seems a failing of successive Governments to get the names of French Presidents properly pronounced. The previous President was inevitably and almost always referred to as Mr Sarkozy as if it was meant to

rhyme with tea cosy, when in fact it does not; and President Hollande is President Hollande and not President Hollander.

Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
12 June 2012
Reference
737 c1274
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as regards those who are pleading for not one single cent more of British money to be spent on sorting out the problems in the eurozone, will the Minister bear in mind what the consequences might be if a newly elected Greek Government after the next elections wish to tear up all the agreements made, which would almost certainly provoke an exit from the eurozone leading to extraordinary problems for Greece? But the most important point, which has not been much discussed, is whether we are prepared to consider seriously the impact of a failed state in the Balkans and the probability that this will provoke a resurgence of nationalism in the region. It is the Balkans that we need to think about and not just Greece.

Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 May 2012
Reference
737 c383
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I declare an interest, having been through the tunnel over 1,500 times, getting to work here and going home again, and indeed having lived to tell the tale. The Minister said that the Government would be trying to set up a system whereby the border agency's immigration controls would be conducted in Brussels. He must be aware that this system works extremely well in Paris; it saves a lot of time and there is absolutely no delay arriving in St Pancras. I hope that he will look into this and tell us what the problem is. They are very friendly people. This morning when I came through I was asked by the immigration officer what I was planning to do with the House of Lords Reform Bill. I declined to share my views with him, in the same way that at the moment I decline to share my views with the House on that question.
Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1547
House
House of Lords
My Lords, prompted by the very pertinent question put by the noble Baroness, Lady Trumpington, can I ask the Minister if, when these police cars are no longer considered roadworthy, they are put out to grass and placed at the disposal of the Prime Minister and his friends?
Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
14 March 2012
Reference
736 c273
House
House of Lords
My Lords, given the unrest on the Conservative Benches in the other place I was tempted to ask whether the Prime Minister had contingency plans for the full recovery and strengthening of the eurozone, but I have a more serious point to make. Does the Minister agree with me that it is extraordinary that the rating agencies disclaim all responsibility for the impact on borrowing costs of their downgradings when a Government like Italy’s are doing their best to solve their problems, and when an institution such as the European Financial Stability Facility—which was downgraded yesterday by Standard & Poor’s—is trying to maintain its lending capacity in advance of the creation of the new ESM, which will take some time? Do these unaccountable agencies just not care whether the impact of what they do is likely to hamper and jeopardise the eurozone recovery?
Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 January 2012
Reference
734 c456-7
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I am relieved to read that the Prime Minister has recognised that Friday’s negotiations on a fiscal compact are not the occasion to try to repatriate any powers. That is good news, and it should at least save the Prime Minister from having another ASBO slapped on him by the President of France. The Prime Minister says that he wants to be constructive at these negotiations but that he will have some modest demands to make. Does the Minister agree that the chance to participate constructively in the negotiations being held among the 27 does depend on them being among the 27, because that gives him a seat and a voice, whereas if negotiations were confined to the 17 eurozone members he would have neither? If the Prime Minister arrives in Brussels with a list of concessions which he wants granted as a price for his co-operation, there is a serious risk that the 17, tired of Britain’s repeated requests for special treatment, will simply close the door on the 10 outsiders and negotiate without them. What influence will he then have on the outcome?
Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
6 December 2011
Reference
733 c614
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have agreed a list of powers to be repatriated from the European Union, and, if so, when they expect to launch negotiations with the United Kingdom’s European partners.
Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
6 December 2011
Reference
733 c614
House
House of Lords
My Lords, on the eve of the memorial service for the late Lord Ampthill, who passionately championed respect for the provisions of the Companion, I find the Question of my noble friend Lord Williams particularly apt. Does the Minister agree that those minded to abolish this House have a very special duty to ensure from now onwards that any lack of respect for the rules in a new Chamber is not excused by its elected Members on the grounds that they were not respected by the House that they have replaced?
Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 October 2011
Reference
731 c655-6
House
House of Lords
My Lords, would the noble Lord the Leader of the House agree that it would be a very good idea if the usual channels would not do what they did recently over the Armed Forces Bill and make an agreement that matters discussed on Report would not be voted on until Third Reading? This is not in keeping with what the Companion says, nor is it particularly acceptable that we should be told that this is a one-off that does not set a precedent. When you do something you set a precedent and the only question that is open after that is whether it is going to be followed. My fear is that this could be followed because we have opened a door that should have been kept closed.
Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
6 October 2011
Reference
730 c1215
House
House of Lords
Would it not be possible to reduce the use of plastic bags if more could be done to encourage the producers and manufacturers of goods that are sold in supermarkets to stop packaging them as if they were mothballing an aircraft carrier?
Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2011
Reference
730 c275
House
House of Lords
I am most grateful to my noble friend for giving way. I declare an interest, having served 30 years with the World Bank and being in receipt of a pension from it. I totally agree with what the noble Lord, Lord Stern of Brentford, has said about the necessity of broadening the field of recruitment. Does the Minister agree that the most important aspect is to make sure that the best qualified person gets the job and that it is extremely important that, whatever negotiations are held, the G20 should not go from one stitch-up, which we have now, to another and thereby end up with the lowest common denominator of approval? We should at least find the best people available for both these posts.
Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
722 c1479-80
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I declare an interest as a member of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on the Dalits. Now that the Delhi state government have finally acknowledged this diversion of funds which should have gone to projects such as schools, healthcare centres and, most importantly, the eradication of the demeaning manual scavenging which is the means of livelihood for so many of the Dalits, does the Minister—who I know has long been a great champion of the Commonwealth—agree that the Secretary-General of the Commonwealth should ensure that the lessons to be learnt from this very unfortunate incident should be placed on the agenda of the next Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Perth, Australia, next October so that there can be a full discussion of whether it is correct and sensible for a country which has more than half its population living in absolute poverty and is a recipient of development aid to be seeking to host an enormous event at such colossal cost?
Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 November 2010
Reference
722 c53-4
House
House of Lords
My Lords, will the noble Lord the Leader of the House concede that pleading resource constraint does not constitute a credible argument against publishing as many Bills as possible in draft? Does he recall what the Liaison Committee in another place concluded in 2001 in its report, Shifting the Balance: Unfinished Business? It said: "““We repeat our view that the benefits in terms of better thought out and properly examined legislation will be out of all proportion to the modest expenditure involved””." Is that not still true today?
Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 2010
Reference
721 c1305-6
House
House of Lords
Will the Minister give me an assurance that those who are digging for victory in their allotments are free to plant genetically modified crops without fear of them being ripped out at dead of night or even by the light of day?
Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 October 2010
Reference
721 c712
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I declare an interest as someone who appeared before the decolonisation committee many times in the 1970s, defending the World Bank’s position that it could not lend money to the PLO because it was not a sovereign state. Does the Minister agree that the empty-chair policy is not very enlightened? As we have heard, many Commonwealth countries are members of that committee. Would it not be appropriate for at least the United Kingdom to be present?
Asked by
Lord Grenfell (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 October 2010
Reference
721 c332
House
House of Lords