Skip to main content

1-20 of 98 results for primarymember:"Lord Greenhalgh"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, sadly I do not have any relevant interests to declare in the way that my noble friend Lord Vaizey of Didcot has. He is right about the importance of the video game industry but, as a parent of three children, I am pleased that the noble Lord, Lord Foster, has raised this issue, because my son, at not much more than 10 years of age, suddenly spent several hundred pounds on a video game precisely because of this sort of entrapment. We need to keep a weather-eye on this. I encourage the Government to realise that when your child plays a video game, you expect them to play a video game, and when they gamble, you expect them to gamble. At the moment, the lines are too blurred.

Asked by
Lord Greenhalgh (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2023
Reference
834 c1890
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does my noble friend the Minister accept that this is not a time to assume that the status quo is good enough? The noble Lord, Lord Stunell, is absolutely right: what we see is the big players squeezing the supply chain, and the result is often that the smaller players benefit not one penny and the big players do profit. I pay tribute to the noble Lord, Lord Aberdare, who, when I was in the hot seat, was pushing on cash retentions. We need to do something about this. It is very similar to when we rent a home: the landlord does not get his hands on the deposit; it is held, essentially, at a distance from the landlord who is renting the home. We need to change the system. Does my noble friend also agree that we need to improve the quality of construction? After all, that is something that needs to get better, and then we would not have to worry about retentions.

Asked by
Lord Greenhalgh (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 December 2023
Reference
834 c1719
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does my noble friend the Minister accept that of course we want to see the best for children irrespective of our political parties, but the Cabinet table is rather small and that the balkanisation of responsibilities does not necessarily lend itself to the best interests of children? Does he accept that, as well as central government, there are people in this House who have served with distinction in regional government, like himself at City Hall, where we cared for children, and—dare I say it?—in the municipal setting as well? Let us recognise that creating a Minister for Children is not the only answer.

Asked by
Lord Greenhalgh (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
6 December 2023
Reference
834 c1468
House
House of Lords

Before we get to an understanding of what the best solution is to the number of empty homes we have, can my noble friend the Minister explain why we see such stark regional variations? A lot is made of the number of empty homes in London, but the proportion of dwelling stock that lies empty is greatest in the north-east. What is driving this increase in parts of the country?

Asked by
Lord Greenhalgh (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 October 2023
Reference
833 c389
House
House of Lords

It has been very helpful to hear the assurance that we will see leasehold reform before the end of this Parliament, but could my noble friend push to have the Bill published? It is going to be very complex, with issues around enfranchisement, the right to manage and encouraging and reinvigorating commonhold. Can we publish the Bill so that we can begin the pre-legislative scrutiny as soon as possible?

Asked by
Lord Greenhalgh (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 May 2023
Reference
829 c1394
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the point that we want to establish is that, as the noble Lord, Lord Bird, knows, rooflessness is very different from homelessness. These latest statistics are very concerning indeed, although the overall trend being 35% down is positive. What I really want to know is whether the Minister knows how many have been sleeping rough a second night, which is obviously even more concerning. Have we made progress in that regard?

Asked by
Lord Greenhalgh (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 March 2023
Reference
828 c242
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is it not fair to say that implicit in the last two Questions is the rather disappointing uptake in the number of homes putting in heat pumps? I declare that I put in a gas boiler recently and got change from £5,000. Have the Government done any work on the point raised by my noble friend Lord Forsyth on the cost for the average

punter to change their home? The reality is that the markets determine what people put in. We need to look at the actual cost of installing a heat pump. If we imagine a scenario where 10% of new builds have heat pumps and the retrofit programmes go in great guns, what would it cost to install one of these things? Have we got research? If the Minister cannot answer me directly at the Dispatch Box, will he please write to me with a detailed response?

Asked by
Lord Greenhalgh (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 February 2023
Reference
828 c133
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does my noble friend the Minister recognise that it is not the banks that we should be aiming at but the fraudsters themselves. The City of London Police, the Metropolitan Police and the National Crime Agency do a fantastic job.

However, in some ways, Action Fraud should be renamed “No Further Action Fraud”, because we need more resources. This crime is getting greater. Let us not turn our fire on the banks but go after the fraudsters.

Asked by
Lord Greenhalgh (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 January 2023
Reference
826 c1625
House
House of Lords

Lords motions to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Greenhalgh
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
29 June 2022
Reference
823 cc650-1
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Greenhalgh
Answering member
Lord Khan of Burnley
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
28 June 2022
Reference
823 cc135-140GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Greenhalgh
Answering member
Lord Khan of Burnley
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
28 June 2022
Reference
823 cc140-4GC
House
House of Lords

Lords second reading. Agreed to on question. Committed to a Grand Committee.

Lead member
Lord Greenhalgh
Answering member
Baroness Hayman of Ullock
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Debates on bills
Date
27 June 2022
Reference
823 cc444-469
House
House of Lords

Lords motion on instruction to Grand Committee on order of clauses to be taken. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Greenhalgh
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
27 June 2022
Reference
823 cc469-471
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the private rented sector.

Lead member
Lord Greenhalgh
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
20 June 2022
Reference
823 cc99-108
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Greenhalgh
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
14 June 2022
Reference
822 cc1477-8
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Greenhalgh
Answering member
Baroness Hayman of Ullock
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
13 June 2022
Reference
822 cc165-173GC
House
House of Lords

Lords presentation and first reading. (HL Bill 21).

Lead member
Lord Greenhalgh
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
8 June 2022
Reference
822 cc1155-6
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons amendments. Motion A, to not insist on amendment 6 and agreed to amendment 6A in lieu, debated with motions B-H. Motion A agreed to. Motions B-G agreed to, with motion D1 not moved. Motion H, to agree with amendments 184A-D, and motion H1 to agree with...

Lead member
Lord Greenhalgh
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Debates on bills
Date
26 April 2022
Reference
821 cc197-215
House
House of Lords

Queen's consent signified. Prince of Wales's consent signified. Statement on legislative consent. Lords third reading. Amendment 1 agreed to. Bill passed and returned to the Commons with amendments.

Lead member
Lord Greenhalgh
Answering member
Baroness Hayman of Ullock
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Debates on bills
Date
4 April 2022
Reference
820 cc1843-1851
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage. Amendments 3 to 6 agreed to. Amendment 8 agreed to on division (176 to 151). Amendments 9 to 12 and 14 agreed to. Amendment 15 under consideration. (Part 1 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Greenhalgh
Answering member
Baroness Hayman of Ullock
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Debates on bills
Date
29 March 2022
Reference
820 cc1389-1439
House
House of Lords