Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,092 results for legtitle:"Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Serious Crime Bill (HL) (CHAP 27 2007); Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill (CHAP 28 2007); Legal Services Bill (HL) (CHAP 29 2007); UK Borders Bill (CHAP 30 2007); Dioceses Pastoral and Mission Measure (No 1). Royal Assent notified 30 October 2007.

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
30 October 2007
Reference
465 c629
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
30 October 2007
Reference
CHAP 29 2007

My Lords, it is not being suggested that the Lord Chief Justice is in a more powerful position through the language which will go into the Bill if the Commons view prevails. I shall not add any more words. We all know the issue. I wish to test the opinion...

Member
Lord Neill of Bladen (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1151-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, like the noble Lord, Lord Neill, believe that this is a very important matter. Equally, he was right to emphasise the importance of the Legal Services Board. I have already set out the reasons why the Government have clarified in statute what the consultation with the Lord...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1150-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not disagree with the noble Lord. Clearly, concurrence that gives a veto to the Lord Chief Justice is a degree more weighty than consultation. My argument is that consultation is the appropriate mechanism.

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1151
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will say just a few words in reply. I listened to the speech of the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland. The opening few paragraphs seemed to be rather good, but unfortunately the quality was not maintained and he ended with a view about how he and his cohorts...

Member
Lord Neill of Bladen (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1151
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, regret this, but we have come to the stage where we should no longer insist. Therefore, I follow the line that my noble friend Lord Kingsland has taken.

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1150
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 88B to 88M in lieu of Commons Amendments Nos. 74 to 77 and 81 to 88, to which this House disagreed. We turn again to the important role of the Lord Chief...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1146-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister has just made an extremely helpful addition. On Question, Motion agreed to. 88B: Page 121, line 6, leave out ““with the concurrence of the Lord Chief Justice”” 88C: Page 121, line 10, leave out ““with the concurrence of the Lord Chief Justice”” 88D: Page 121, line...

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1146
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful. I should like to make it clear that whatever the debate over the wording, I do not think that there is anything between us in the constructive relationship that we want to see between the board and the individual regulators.

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1145
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am most grateful to the noble Lord for the amendment he has placed before your Lordships today. The issue that lies behind it can be put very simply—in fact, as it was by the Minister in another place in a debate that took place on this Bill...

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1145
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry that the Conservative Party is taking a different view and is resiling from very important principles. The noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, was right to emphasise that the independence of the judiciary demands an independent Bar and an independent Law Society. Solicitors must be as independent...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1150
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have from these Benches supported the noble Lord, Lord Neill of Bladen, in his amendment on two occasions. The matter has now come back to us for a third time. I have no doubt that when the Minister comes to speak, he will draw our attention to...

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1148-9
House
House of Lords

rose to move, as an amendment to Motion C, leave out from ““House”” to end, and insert, ““do insist on its disagreement to Commons Amendments Nos. 74 to 77 and 81 to 88, do disagree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 88B and 88C and 88E to 88M, do...

Member
Lord Neill of Bladen (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1147-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 15B and do not insist on its Amendment No. 15A. Noble Lords may recognise the substance of the amendment made in the other place. When we considered this important issue of the...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1144-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords for their comments. There is no question that we have now reached an altogether satisfactory conclusion. I am grateful to all noble Lords who took part in the debates and in the discussions of the past 24 hours. On Question, Motion agreed to. 15B:...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1144
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, shall say a word of gratitude to the Minister. I spoke against the proposal, he took the point and he has produced a wholly acceptable compromise. I am very grateful.

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1144
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in my youth I appeared in many cases on behalf of trade union members, instructed by trade unions. In those cases, we were particularly concerned with personal injuries sustained in the course of work. I was acting not on behalf of a trade union organisation, but on behalf...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1144
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is extremely important, and I am grateful to the Government for recognising the necessity to protect individual trade union members who make use of these services outside the limited scope of the original idea. These services that trade unions offer to their members are extremely valuable, and...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1144
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we debated this in Committee. The government amendment before us meets the objections that I voiced. I was very concerned that the amendment we passed would undermine the services that unions rightfully provide to individual members. This amendment, which has been passed by the other place, deals with...

Member
Baroness Turner of Camden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
695 c1144
House
House of Lords