Skip to main content

41-60 of 76,961 results for subject:Devolution

Type

-
Early day motions (157)
+ Legislation (253) + Acts (29)
-
Public acts (29)
+ Bills (83) + Public bills (83)
-
Government bills (36)
+ Private members' bills (47)
-
Ballot bills (3)
-
Presentation bills (20)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (12)
-
Ten minute rule bills (12)
+ Delegated legislation (141)
-
Statutory instruments (141)
+ Members' contributions (69,334)
-
Business questions (407)
-
Maiden speeches (101)
-
Oral answers to questions (3,169)
-
Oral question time interventions (73)
+ Oral questions (3,382)
-
Prime Minister's questions (307)
-
Topical questions (147)
-
Points of order (22)
-
Proceeding contributions (62,689)
-
Speaker's rulings (2)
+ Parliamentary committees (1,429) + Committee proceedings (847)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (48)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (118)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (102)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (22)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (192)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (339)
-
Select Committee reports (248)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (107)
-
Select Committee written evidence (279)
+ Parliamentary papers (1,436)
-
Annual reports (26)
-
Command papers (127)
-
Consultation papers (12)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (8)
-
Deposited papers (513)
-
House of Commons papers (616)
-
House of Lords papers (115)
-
Impact assessments (28)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (1)
-
Treaties (2)
-
Unprinted command papers (2)
-
Unprinted papers (39)
-
White papers (10)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (2,428) + Debates (1,661)
-
Adjournment debates (68)
-
Backbench debates (22)
+ Committee proceedings (847)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (48)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (118)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (102)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (22)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (192)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (339)
-
Debates on select committee reports (28)
-
Debates on treaties (3)
-
e-petition debates (2)
-
Emergency debate applications (4)
-
Emergency debates (4)
-
Estimates days (4)
+ Legislative debates (976)
-
Debates on bills (729)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (246)
+ Monarch's speech debates (30)
-
King's speech debates (3)
-
Queen's speech debates (27)
-
Opposition days (20)
-
Questions for short debate (20)
+ Formal proceedings (4)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (3)
+ Petitions and observations (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
-
Private notice questions (5)
+ Statements (709) + Oral statements (185)
-
Business statements (8)
-
Ministerial statements (169)
-
Select Committee statements (6)
-
Written statements (524)
-
Urgent questions (13)
+ Written corrections (3)
-
Ministerial corrections (3)
+ Parliamentary questions (7,070)
-
Business questions (407)
+ Oral questions (3,382)
-
Prime Minister's questions (307)
-
Topical questions (147)
-
Private notice questions (5)
-
Urgent questions (13)
-
Written questions (3,263)
+ Petitions and observations (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (240) + Commons Briefing papers (159)
-
Briefing papers on bills (18)
-
Parliament facts and figures (1)
-
Commons Debate packs (37)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Bills (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (35)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (18)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (13)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (2)
-
POSTnotes (8)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 54 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, and Amendment 55 in the name of my noble friend Lord Moylan. Obviously, I have not heard my noble friend’s exposition of the purpose of his amendment, which I look forward to listening...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc308-9GC
House
House of Lords

May I just say that three months’ notice is not a long time and any arbitrary cut cannot possibly take place in three months because timetables, trains and rosters have to be altered? Three months is a very short amount of time to give the rail regulator to make decisions.

I...

Member
Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c309GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the noble Lord’s intervention. I had not yet started dealing with his amendment in detail—I was dealing with my noble friend Lord Moylan’s—but I listened carefully to what he said and will deal with it when I get to his amendment.

I am not sure that I...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc309-310GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what an absolute pleasure it is to hear from my railway expert noble friend Lord Bradshaw. It is such a delight that he has been able to join us in Committee in person today and to contribute to our debate, particularly after he had a significant birthday yesterday.

Funding...

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc310-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have a number of amendments in this group: Amendments 55, 56, 70, 78 and 86. I start with Amendment 78. Paragraph 15 of Schedule 2 states:

“Financial assistance given to Great British Railways or a GBR company”

primarily to enable it to carry out its infrastructure functions under Clause...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc311-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, briefly, the amendments from the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, on producing a business plan are absolutely essential because, as he noted, the railways need long-term investment. It is not just trains which need to somehow be ordered 10 or 20 years before they are needed but things such...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c313GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords for this debate on group 5 and will echo the noble Baroness, Lady Pidgeon: it is a delight to see the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, in his place this afternoon. I am sure that the rest of the Grand Committee wishes him, as...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc313-7GC
House
House of Lords

I start by saying how much I disagree with the remarks of the noble Lord, Lord Harper. His idea that parliamentary scrutiny is carried out properly in the House of Commons is absolutely false, because the whipping system there does not permit a full and frank discussion such as we...

Member
Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc315-8GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Pidgeon

57: Schedule 2, page 70, line 15, after “services” insert “, including passenger services,”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment and two others to Schedule 2 in the name of Baroness Pidgeon would align funding of designated passenger train services with the five-year funding cycle for infrastructure.

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c318GC
House
House of Lords

My Amendments 57, 58 and 61 are about aligning the funding of designated passenger train services with the five-year funding cycle for infrastructure. There is absolutely no point in bringing track and train together if their funding cycles are over different periods of time. For this new organisation to succeed...

Member
Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c318GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak on my two amendments in this group, Amendments 67 and 72. Amendment 67 is simply another opportunity, as there was in the last group, to explore and, I hope, again extract assurance from the Minister that the business plan and GBR’s statements in it will...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc318-320GC
House
House of Lords

In response to the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, about the subsidy, the consequence of what he is suggesting could happen is that GBR could subsidise a passenger service that was on the same route as, and in competition with, a private sector operator. To me, that...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c320GC
House
House of Lords

I am not sure if that is a question to me, but let us assume it is. I am not sure that I am saying that. I am saying that, as things stand under this Bill, the Secretary of State is not providing money to GBR for the purpose of...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c320GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 314 in my name, supported by my noble friend Lord Moylan, enters the arcane world of Treasury theology—what is and what is not public expenditure. It would require the Secretary of State to report on the impact of the Bill on public finances. This is important because...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc320-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is difficult to follow my noble friend Lord Young of Cookham because his expositions of difficult issues are always so clear and compelling. There is a movement on the left wing of the Labour Party—which is well represented in your Lordships’ House—to nationalise the roscos so that...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc322-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendments 57, 58 and 61 are about the funding of passenger services. In principle, I support the intentions of these amendments and acknowledge the benefits to business planning that aligning the funding cycles could bring. However, the reality of passenger services funding is that it is inextricably tied...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc324-8GC
House
House of Lords

Is the noble Lord’s position that one of the consequences of this Bill, if enacted—we will not know for some months until after it is enacted—is that roughly £25 billion-worth of rolling stock could be added to government debt? I do not want to argue about the figure, but I...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c325GC
House
House of Lords

Since it is independent, nobody can predict the consequences of an Office for National Statistics examination until it concludes one. I said that the Secretary of State will work with it, because it will also need to consider the recent past. The Bill is in Parliament because it has cross-government...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c325GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to press the noble Lord. I agree that if the ONS is independent he cannot say what its decision will be, but he could secure that decision before the passage of the legislation. That cannot be too difficult. Given the consequence, it must be possible to secure...

Member
Lord Moylan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c325GC
House
House of Lords

I already said that one thing the Secretary of State will do is to help the ONS with its understanding of both the recent past and what will happen as a consequence of the Bill. In the recent past, the Government have specified, to the most extraordinarily detailed degree, all...

Member
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c325GC
House
House of Lords