21-40 of 4,710 results for subject:"Information Commissioner's Office"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.261 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.01 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Information Commissioner's Office"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Information Commissioner's Office" OR subject_t:ICO OR subject_t:"Information Commissioner" OR subject_ses:26799
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether recruitment for the next Information Commissioner has commenced; and if she will publish the expected timetable for an appointment.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether recruitment for the next Information Commissioner has commenced; and if she will publish the expected timetable for an appointment.
DSIT and the ICO have continued to work together on the transition to the Information Commission whilst the independent investigation was taking place. Due to the changes to the regulator’s governance structure, DSIT will be recruiting a Chair of the Information Commission in due course. A timetable will be set out when the campaign is launched.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether the independent workplace investigation of the former Information Commissioner, John Edwards, considered the actions and inaction of other senior Information Commissioner's Office leaders present or past who witnessed and failed to challenge inappropriate workplace behaviour.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether the independent workplace investigation of the former Information Commissioner, John Edwards, considered the actions and inaction of other senior Information Commissioner's Office leaders present or past who witnessed and failed to challenge inappropriate workplace behaviour.
The investigation focused solely on the allegations made against Mr Edwards.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what was the earliest date on which the Information Commissioner's Office informed her Department, or its predecessor sponsor Department, whether formally or informally, of any complaint, concern, allegation, grievance or report relating to the conduct of John Edwards during...
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what was the earliest date on which the Information Commissioner's Office informed her Department, or its predecessor sponsor Department, whether formally or informally, of any complaint, concern, allegation, grievance or report relating to the conduct of John Edwards during...
Ministers were informed of workplace allegations relating to the Information Commissioner’s conduct on 16 February 2026.
Ministers were not informed of any complaints prior to this.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether the Executive Director for Communications and Public Affairs at the Information Commissioner's Office was interviewed by the independent workplace investigation of the former Information Commissioner.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether the Executive Director for Communications and Public Affairs at the Information Commissioner's Office was interviewed by the independent workplace investigation of the former Information Commissioner.
It is not appropriate to comment on who was interviewed as part of the investigation.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, with reference to the independent workplace assessment, whether she plans to require the Information Commissioner's Office to implement any recommendations relating to workplace culture and staff welfare.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, with reference to the independent workplace assessment, whether she plans to require the Information Commissioner's Office to implement any recommendations relating to workplace culture and staff welfare.
The allegations and subsequent independent investigation pertained to Mr Edwards alone; however, we are currently considering any further next steps.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of the appointments process undertaken for the new Information Commission Board.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of the appointments process undertaken for the new Information Commission Board.
We are confident in the adequacy of the process that was followed to appoint non-executive members to the new Information Commission. The recruitment campaign was launched last June and has concluded. It was carried out in accordance with the public appointments process and was regulated by the Commissioner for Public Appointments. The competition was fair and open, as provided for in legislation, and advertised on GOV.UK. The resulting appointments will be announced in due course.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether she plans to publish the findings, recommendations and conclusions of the independent workplace investigation into John Edwards.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether she plans to publish the findings, recommendations and conclusions of the independent workplace investigation into John Edwards.
We are looking at options following receipt of the report, working closely with the ICO who commissioned the investigation. It is important that any decision protects the witnesses and those who made the allegations.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment her Department has made of the adequacy of the timeliness of the Information Commissioner's Office in investigating complaints concerning the handling of special category health data.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment her Department has made of the adequacy of the timeliness of the Information Commissioner's Office in investigating complaints concerning the handling of special category health data.
While DSIT acts as the ICO's sponsor department within government, the ICO is an independent regulator accountable to Parliament. The ICO has a statutory duty to investigate complaints from data subjects to the extent appropriate and reports annually to Parliament on its approach to complaints and investigations.
The ICO does not publish complaint handling times by category of personal data. However, it triages all complaints based on the level of harm that alleged non-compliant practices may pose to data subjects.
To address its backlog, the ICO has introduced a new data protection complaints framework setting out how it assesses and prioritises each case. In addition, the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 introduced a new requirement for all data controllers to establish procedures for responding to complaints, aiming to resolve issues at the earliest stage and reduce premature escalation to the ICO.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, how long does the current interim Chief Executive Officer post for the Information Commissioner's Office last.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, how long does the current interim Chief Executive Officer post for the Information Commissioner's Office last.
The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 established the Information Commission, a new body corporate that will assume the ICO's regulatory functions to become the UK's independent data protection regulator. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) and the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) are working closely on this transition, and while a date for it has not yet been set, work is well advanced.
The Information Commission will be led by a chair, chief executive, and other non-executive and executive members with shared decision-making responsibility. The new Board will be appointed as part of the transition process.
For clarity, there is no role titled “interim Chief Executive Officer of the Information Commissioner’s Office”. Following an open competition run by the ICO in March 2025, Paul Arnold was appointed as Interim Chief Executive of the Information Commission, a position which he will formally assume when the transition to the Information Commission takes place. He may serve in that role for a period of up to two years, after which time a recruitment process will be undertaken to fill the role on a permanent basis.
The Data (Use and Access) Act provides that the permanent Chief Executive will be appointed through open and fair competition by the Commission's non-executive members, in consultation with the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology.
Paul Arnold is currently serving as Interim Chief Executive Designate of the Information Commission, alongside his Deputy Commissioner responsibilities at the ICO. In his interim CEO designate role, Paul is leading and overseeing the transition to the new Information Commission. As for the use of titles, this, like other day-to-day operational matters, is a question for the independent regulator. I expect the ICO may have used "CEO" for brevity, but that would be for them to confirm.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what is the process by which a permanent Chief Executive Officer of the Information Commissioner's Office will be selected and appointed.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what is the process by which a permanent Chief Executive Officer of the Information Commissioner's Office will be selected and appointed.
The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 established the Information Commission, a new body corporate that will assume the ICO's regulatory functions to become the UK's independent data protection regulator. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) and the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) are working closely on this transition, and while a date for it has not yet been set, work is well advanced.
The Information Commission will be led by a chair, chief executive, and other non-executive and executive members with shared decision-making responsibility. The new Board will be appointed as part of the transition process.
For clarity, there is no role titled “interim Chief Executive Officer of the Information Commissioner’s Office”. Following an open competition run by the ICO in March 2025, Paul Arnold was appointed as Interim Chief Executive of the Information Commission, a position which he will formally assume when the transition to the Information Commission takes place. He may serve in that role for a period of up to two years, after which time a recruitment process will be undertaken to fill the role on a permanent basis.
The Data (Use and Access) Act provides that the permanent Chief Executive will be appointed through open and fair competition by the Commission's non-executive members, in consultation with the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology.
Paul Arnold is currently serving as Interim Chief Executive Designate of the Information Commission, alongside his Deputy Commissioner responsibilities at the ICO. In his interim CEO designate role, Paul is leading and overseeing the transition to the new Information Commission. As for the use of titles, this, like other day-to-day operational matters, is a question for the independent regulator. I expect the ICO may have used "CEO" for brevity, but that would be for them to confirm.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, why the interim Chief Executive Officer is referring to himself as Chief Executive Officer of the Information Commissioner's Office.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, why the interim Chief Executive Officer is referring to himself as Chief Executive Officer of the Information Commissioner's Office.
The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 established the Information Commission, a new body corporate that will assume the ICO's regulatory functions to become the UK's independent data protection regulator. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) and the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) are working closely on this transition, and while a date for it has not yet been set, work is well advanced.
The Information Commission will be led by a chair, chief executive, and other non-executive and executive members with shared decision-making responsibility. The new Board will be appointed as part of the transition process.
For clarity, there is no role titled “interim Chief Executive Officer of the Information Commissioner’s Office”. Following an open competition run by the ICO in March 2025, Paul Arnold was appointed as Interim Chief Executive of the Information Commission, a position which he will formally assume when the transition to the Information Commission takes place. He may serve in that role for a period of up to two years, after which time a recruitment process will be undertaken to fill the role on a permanent basis.
The Data (Use and Access) Act provides that the permanent Chief Executive will be appointed through open and fair competition by the Commission's non-executive members, in consultation with the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology.
Paul Arnold is currently serving as Interim Chief Executive Designate of the Information Commission, alongside his Deputy Commissioner responsibilities at the ICO. In his interim CEO designate role, Paul is leading and overseeing the transition to the new Information Commission. As for the use of titles, this, like other day-to-day operational matters, is a question for the independent regulator. I expect the ICO may have used "CEO" for brevity, but that would be for them to confirm.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what is the current (a) position title, (b) post and (c) duties of the interim Chief Executive Officer of the Information Commissioner's Office.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what is the current (a) position title, (b) post and (c) duties of the interim Chief Executive Officer of the Information Commissioner's Office.
The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 established the Information Commission, a new body corporate that will assume the ICO's regulatory functions to become the UK's independent data protection regulator. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) and the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) are working closely on this transition, and while a date for it has not yet been set, work is well advanced.
The Information Commission will be led by a chair, chief executive, and other non-executive and executive members with shared decision-making responsibility. The new Board will be appointed as part of the transition process.
For clarity, there is no role titled “interim Chief Executive Officer of the Information Commissioner’s Office”. Following an open competition run by the ICO in March 2025, Paul Arnold was appointed as Interim Chief Executive of the Information Commission, a position which he will formally assume when the transition to the Information Commission takes place. He may serve in that role for a period of up to two years, after which time a recruitment process will be undertaken to fill the role on a permanent basis.
The Data (Use and Access) Act provides that the permanent Chief Executive will be appointed through open and fair competition by the Commission's non-executive members, in consultation with the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology.
Paul Arnold is currently serving as Interim Chief Executive Designate of the Information Commission, alongside his Deputy Commissioner responsibilities at the ICO. In his interim CEO designate role, Paul is leading and overseeing the transition to the new Information Commission. As for the use of titles, this, like other day-to-day operational matters, is a question for the independent regulator. I expect the ICO may have used "CEO" for brevity, but that would be for them to confirm.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, when the new board for the Information Commissioner's Office will be put in place.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, when the new board for the Information Commissioner's Office will be put in place.
The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 established the Information Commission, a new body corporate that will assume the ICO's regulatory functions to become the UK's independent data protection regulator. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) and the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) are working closely on this transition, and while a date for it has not yet been set, work is well advanced.
The Information Commission will be led by a chair, chief executive, and other non-executive and executive members with shared decision-making responsibility. The new Board will be appointed as part of the transition process.
For clarity, there is no role titled “interim Chief Executive Officer of the Information Commissioner’s Office”. Following an open competition run by the ICO in March 2025, Paul Arnold was appointed as Interim Chief Executive of the Information Commission, a position which he will formally assume when the transition to the Information Commission takes place. He may serve in that role for a period of up to two years, after which time a recruitment process will be undertaken to fill the role on a permanent basis.
The Data (Use and Access) Act provides that the permanent Chief Executive will be appointed through open and fair competition by the Commission's non-executive members, in consultation with the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology.
Paul Arnold is currently serving as Interim Chief Executive Designate of the Information Commission, alongside his Deputy Commissioner responsibilities at the ICO. In his interim CEO designate role, Paul is leading and overseeing the transition to the new Information Commission. As for the use of titles, this, like other day-to-day operational matters, is a question for the independent regulator. I expect the ICO may have used "CEO" for brevity, but that would be for them to confirm.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps she is taking to help reduce waiting times for complaints and enquiries to the Information Commissioner’s Office.
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps she is taking to help reduce waiting times for complaints and enquiries to the Information Commissioner’s Office.
While DSIT acts as the ICO’s sponsor department within government, it is an independent regulator and accountable to Parliament.
To address their backlog, the ICO has introduced a new data protection complaints framework that sets out how it assesses and prioritises each case and determines the extent to which it is appropriate to investigate. This approach is designed to help the ICO focus its resources on the most serious issues and provide more timely outcomes. The framework can be viewed at: https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint/data-protection-framework/.
From 19 June 2026 when relevant provisions in the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 come into force, controllers will also be required to have a process in place to acknowledge data protection complaints from members of the public within a month of receipt and respond to the complaint without undue delay. If complaints are dealt with effectively by organisations, this will further reduce pressure on ICO’s resources.
To ask His Majesty's Government what the Freedom of Information casework budget for the Information Commissioner's Office will be next year; and whether that budget will match the previous year's in real terms.
To ask His Majesty's Government what the Freedom of Information casework budget for the Information Commissioner's Office will be next year; and whether that budget will match the previous year's in real terms.
While the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) is the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)’s sponsor department within government and provide ICO’s Freedom of Information (FOI) funding as a Grant-in-Aid, government policy for Freedom of Information sits with the Cabinet Office.
The government is committed to ensuring sufficient funding for the ICO’s FOI responsibilities. Spending review budget allocations until Financial Year 2028-29 will be finalised by DSIT and will be published in due course.
Lords consideration of Commons amendments. Lords amendments 38V to 38X to Commons amendment 38J not insisted on, Commons amendments 38Z12 to 38Z21 in lieu agreed to and Lords amendment 38Z22 to Commons amendment 38Z17, Lords amendment 38Z23 to Commons amendment 38Z18, Lords amendment 38Z24 to Commons amendment 38Z20, and Lords amendment 38Z25 to Commons amendment 38Z21 disagreed to on division (91 to 181).
Lords consideration of Commons amendments. Lords amendments 38V to 38X to Commons amendment 38J not insisted on, Commons amendments 38Z12 to 38Z21 in lieu agreed to and Lords amendment 38Z22 to Commons amendment 38Z17, Lords amendment 38Z23 to Commons amendment 38Z18, Lords amendment 38Z24 to Commons amendment 38Z20, and Lords...