Skip to main content

21-40 of 943 results for subject:"Digital switchover help scheme"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport how much funding his Department has allocated to each ITV region under the Digital Switchover Help Scheme to date.

Asked by
Jessica Lee (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 July 2010
Reference
6661; 513 c367W
House
House of Commons
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
Cm 7831
House
House of Commons
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
Cm 7830
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 18/03/2010 from Ben Bradshaw MP to Sir Michael Lyons (Chairman, BBC Trust) regarding repaying the underspend for the digital switchover help scheme. 2 p.

Deposited by
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Deposited papers
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
DEP2010-0756
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Select Committee on Communications
Date
18 March 2010
Reference
HL 100 2009-10
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many enquiries from households in Gordon constituency have been received by the Digital UK Help Scheme; and how many of those households were eligible to receive the digital conversion service free of charge.

Asked by
Lord Bruce of Bennachie (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 2010
Reference
507 c405-6W; 321650
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what steps his Department has taken to ensure that those in vulnerable groups will be eligible for the scheme to provide free digital equipment during the digital switchover.

Asked by
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 February 2010
Reference
506 c54W; 316963
House
House of Commons

Digital Economy Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage sixth day. Clauses 19 to 30 agreed to, with clauses 19, 20, 21 and 28 agreed to as amended.

Department
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c223-90
House
House of Lords

231: Clause 21, page 23, leave out lines 5 to 8

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c233
House
House of Lords

My Lords, again, these are probing amendments to clarify Channel 4’s updated remit with regard to film. Clause 21 establishes that Channel 4 must participate in distributing films by means of electronic communications networks. Does this mean that it is compulsory for Channel 4 to invest in streaming films over...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c233-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, one of the most comfortable factors about speaking for the Government at the Dispatch Box is that one always knows that there will be some noble Lord who knows a great deal more about the issues than one does oneself, speaks with greater authority and is likely to...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c233
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his remarks and the noble Lord, Lord Puttnam, for his reassurance that there will be no downgrading. This was a probing amendment. It was not there for any other purpose. There was just one small inconsistency by the Minister. If it is correct to...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c233
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness is right that that is how Channel 4 operates, but I am trying to emphasise that we are not about the business of changing Channel 4’s position at all. I want to meet the anxiety on the Lib Dem Benches and those of the Official Opposition. That...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c232
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, I offer some reassurance to the noble Baroness, Lady Bonham-Carter, and give an example to the noble Lord, Lord Howard of Rising, of why the Government are creating a useful situation. I declare an interest as deputy chairman of Channel 4. During the four years...

Member
Lord Puttnam (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c232-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by reassuring the noble Lord that there is no intention at all of downgrading the quality of programmes for which Channel 4 is responsible. The amendment, which deletes the phrase "taken as a whole", arguably requires all such content to appeal to the tastes and interests...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c231-2
House
House of Lords

Is it the case that the PSB that the new Channel 4 remit is being asked to provide on the non-linear channels can be produced in-house, which goes against the spirit of the whole concept of Channel 4, which is that it is a publishing house that supports independent production...

Member
Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c232
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope that I am not suffering under any illusion as regards this being a probing amendment to identify the position relating to C4C and Channel 4. I make the obvious point that C4C can, and already does, provide a wide range of films, on Channel 4 and...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c234-5
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister. As he said, it is a probing amendment. The point of it is that Channel 4 should be allowed, and not compelled, to show these films. If they are compelled, it may put too great a burden on them. I am not sure whether the Minister...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c235
House
House of Lords

229: Clause 19, page 21, line 33, leave out "or a county court"

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c229
House
House of Lords

This is another amendment where I hope I am being helpful in order that something inadvertent does not happen. It was pointed out to me that should there be an appeal and the courts end up taking an interest, the issue will probably have got quite complex and could be...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c230
House
House of Lords