Skip to main content

1-100 of 280 results for subject:Teesworks

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the value for money to the taxpayer of the arrangements between the South Tees Development Corporation and Teesworks Ltd in relation to the acquisition, remediation and onward sale of land at Teesside Freeport,...

Asked by
Freddie van Mierlo (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 June 2026
Reference
10798
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 6 February (HL4386) about correspondence from the Tees Valley Mayor, whether they have now made a determination about the value for money of the Teesworks project and, if not, why not; and when they...

Asked by
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 April 2025
Reference
HL6200
House
House of Lords

My Honourable Friend the Minister of State for Local Government and English Devolution (Jim McMahon OBE MP) has today made the following statement:

Taxpayers expect and deserve well-functioning local and combined authorities which provide essential statutory services for local residents. This government’s manifesto committed to rebuilding local government and handing control...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written statements
Date
3 April 2025
Reference
HLWS575
House
House of Lords

Taxpayers expect and deserve well-functioning local and combined authorities which provide essential statutory services for local residents. This government’s manifesto committed to rebuilding local government and handing control back to local leaders. To achieve this, we must get the basics right and ensure local and regional government is fit, legal...

Member
Jim McMahon (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written statements
Date
3 April 2025
Reference
HCWS576
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the letter from the Tees Valley Mayor issued on 27 September 2024 in response to the Tees Valley Review on the Teesworks project; and what are the reasons for their delay in replying.

Asked by
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2025
Reference
HL4386
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made on whether the Teesworks regeneration project has met value for money criteria based on the answers and assurances made by the Tees Valley Mayor in progress reports.

Asked by
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 January 2025
Reference
HL3910
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government, following the response to the Secretary of the State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities from the Tees Valley Mayor in September, what assessment they have made of whether all 28 recommendations from the Tees Valley Review, published 23 January, will be carried out effectively...

Asked by
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 November 2024
Reference
HL2333
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to respond to the reply to the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities from the Tees Valley Mayor in September about the recommendations from the Tees Valley Review and, if so, when and how they will publish their response.

Asked by
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 November 2024
Reference
HL2334
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government on what date they have asked the Tees Valley Mayor to submit his final response to the independent Tees Valley Review published on 23 January, and whether they plan to publish this response in full.

Asked by
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 August 2024
Reference
HL455
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government whether they plan to request the National Audit Office to carry out an inspection to the Teesworks programme, and if so when.

Asked by
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 cc794-6
House
House of Lords

I beg leave to ask the Question standing in my name on the Order Paper, and so doing draw the House’s attention to my interest set out in the register as a vice-president of the Local Government Association.

Member
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 c794
House
House of Lords

The previous Government asked the Tees Valley mayor to provide a progress update in September, following the recommendations of the independent review of Tees Valley Combined Authority’s oversight of the South Tees Development Corporation and Teesworks Joint Venture. Once we have received that update, we will consider whether the questions that need to be answered have been and whether any further action should be taken.

Answered by
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 c794
House
House of Lords

My Lords, many Teessiders’ jaws will drop on the floor when they hear that Answer from the Minister, as every Labour candidate in Teesside promised that a National Audit Office review would take place. In the light of half a billion pounds of taxpayers’ money being used and two businessmen making multimillion pound profits without taking any liabilities or any risk to their money, does that constitute best value? Why leave the people who have created the mess to solve the mess without any enforceable action being taken by Government?

Asked by
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 c795
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I pay tribute to the work the noble Lord, Lord Scriven, does in local government, and I understand the deep emotions that he talks about, because there are outstanding questions to which the public deserve answers. We understand that this issue, like all local issues, is emotive. This is evidenced by it being raised in this House and in the other place several times. In fact, the noble Lord, Lord Scriven, has asked this question before. This Government believe that scrutiny and transparency are important. However, we must carefully consider the mayor’s response, due in September, and we will consider any further action to take when we receive it. We are not ruling out any options, and one option could be requesting the NAO to review.

Answered by
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 c795
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the Minister knows, this is an issue that the people of Teesside take very strongly. When I was working in the Tees Valley across a number of constituencies during the election, they really wanted transparency. They want to know what has happened to the money that the public, via the Government and other agencies, have put in and whether the arrangement, which gives 90% of the benefit to two individuals and only 10% to the public, can stand up. I appreciate that the Minister will bring the report, but will he also ask his department to look at an overall system of audit and accountability, because that disappeared when the Audit Commission disappeared, and there is no coherent across-the-board system for the devolved mayors. We want to give them more power, but if they get more power there must be transparency and proper accountability.

Asked by
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 c795
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for raising those important issues. It is true that the previous Government scrapped the Audit Commission and replaced it with a fragmented, locally led audit regime that is failing. This Government are committed to overhauling local audit and restoring better value for money for taxpayers. We are looking closely at all the evidence, and we will set out our plans, including legislation, shortly. I must remind the House that until we get the response of the Mayor of Tees Valley we cannot explore the options. We will wait for the response to the 26 recommendations which the mayor was asked to look at and then take further action.

Answered by
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 c795
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister said that scrutiny is important and has committed the Government to undertaking further action when the mayor’s response has been received. What is the Minister’s expectation of the timescale? The mayor will respond quite soon, as I understand it, and the Government

then have to say what they want to do. Can the Minister tell us how long that might be? Will he take into consideration the fact that the Tees Valley Combined Authority plans to have only five meetings of its cabinet in the period from September this year to the end of June 2025?

Asked by
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 c795
House
House of Lords

I cannot comment on the meeting schedule of the Tees Valley Combined Authority. That is something for it to look at. In relation to the timeline, I have said to the House in previous answers that until six months have passed and the mayor has had an opportunity to address the concerns in relation to the 26 recommendations, we cannot work on this further. In the meantime, we recognise the point made by my noble friend that local audit needs transformative change, and noble Lords will very shortly hear the plans for changing the way local in which audit takes place.

Answered by
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 c796
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister share my mystification that none of the Conservative Members of this House are getting on their feet to make a comment?

Asked by
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 c796
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I always enjoy my noble friend’s mystification. However, I cannot comment on this particular issue. Noble Lords are very welcome to ask any questions, and I am looking forward to them.

Answered by
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 c796
House
House of Lords

My Lords, was there not an independent review into all these matters which found

“no evidence of corruption, wrongdoing or illegality”?

Asked by
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 c796
House
House of Lords

That is absolutely the case. However, there are recommendations on decision-making, governance and scrutiny. I appreciate the noble Lord’s question.

Answered by
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 c796
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I appreciate that the Minister has said the Government have to wait for the mayor’s answers to the questions, which is different from what was being said before the Government were on the Government Benches. However, the review panel said in the report that the responses

“reduced our confidence that we have been given access to all relevant materials”.

The panel also said that it had

“not been able to pursue all lines of evidence or examine all transactions”.

Is that not why a full statutory audit is required: so that the Government convince themselves that Teessiders are getting value for money? With a response from the mayor, the report will have not seen all relevant information.

Asked by
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 c796
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord again makes an important point. I remind the House that it is not the normal role of the NAO to examine or to audit local bodies. However, I understand that the NAO previously stated that it is willing to work outside

its usual scope to undertake a review about Teesworks. We cannot prejudge the response of the Mayor of Tees Valley. When we get that response, we will look at it. In relation to the noble Lord’s question, that is another issue for the combined authority and the Mayor of Tees Valley to look at. Whatever happens, once that response is back with the Government, we will look at it and take further action then.

Answered by
Lord Khan of Burnley (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 July 2024
Reference
839 c796
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government how they intend to monitor progress on the implementation of the 28 recommendations in the Tees Valley Review; and whether they intend to make their findings public.

Asked by
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 May 2024
Reference
HL4355
House
House of Lords

Q3

.

Matt Western (Warwick and Leamington) (Lab):

In today’s Northern Echo, Boro chairman Steve Gibson describes the Mayor of Tees Valley as having given away the future of the region’s children. He was referring to the 40% of Teesworks, with a forecast worth of £500 million, gifted by Lord Houchen in a deal to two local business mates. Mr Gibson, who helped establish the local development corporation, describes that deal as “unforgiveable”. Will the Government finally admit that Lord Houchen and the Conservatives have sold Teesside taxpayers down the river?

Asked by
Matt Western (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2024
Reference
748 c932
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman talks about Teesside taxpayers, but Ben Houchen has never imposed a mayoral precept in Tees Valley, full stop. At the same time, he has saved Teesside airport and secured a new freeport for Teesside—no wonder people will be voting for him again.

Answered by
Oliver Dowden (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
24 April 2024
Reference
748 c932
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Business and Trade Committee
Date
23 April 2024
Reference
HC 272 2023-24
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Business and Trade Committee
Date
16 April 2024
Reference
HC 272 2023-24
House
House of Commons

The public and private sector bodies engaged in the Teesworks project are responsible for ensuring that they comply with all relevant audit requirements. Additionally, the Government commissioned an independent review of the project, which we published in February. The Tees Valley Mayor is implementing its recommendations, including recommendations 27 and 28, relating to the internal and external audit functions.

Answered by
Baroness Swinburne (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c201
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her Answer, but I honestly think that the people of Teesside deserve better than to be fobbed off like this. The independent review published in January said:

“Based on the evidence from the review the governance and financial management arrangements are not of themselves sufficiently robust or transparent to evidence value for money”.

We are told by Ministers that the NAO does not look at individual authorities, so we questioned on 30 January and 7 March just what the arrangements are for auditing this project, so local people can be reassured about the return their significant investment is giving them. We were promised an answer in writing, which has not appeared. In view of the parlous state of local government audit generally, and the nature of the

28 scathing recommendations set out in the review, an NAO financial investigation seems appropriate. Why are the Government still resisting that?

Asked by
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 cc201-2
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for her supplementary question. I assure her that the letter is on its way; I thought that it was already sent, so I apologise if she has not received it yet. As I outlined in my response to the debate on the regeneration of industrial areas on 7 March, it is not the NAO’s role to audit or examine individual local authorities, and its power would not normally be used for that purpose. I have since looked into this, and expanding its remit previously required the Chief Secretary to the Treasury to grant statutory powers. Therefore, given that we have had a thorough independent review, it is time that we learned from it and implemented those lessons rather than repeat it.

Answered by
Baroness Swinburne (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c202
House
House of Lords

My Lords, two businessmen are making multi-millions of pounds of profits on the back of £0.5 billion-worth of taxpayers’ investment, without them putting any of their own cash at risk or taking any liabilities until they are negated against guaranteed income streams. The Tees Valley Review said that these generous contractual arrangements should be renegotiated, as the businessmen are making super-profits at the expense of local taxpayers. Do the Government agree with that finding and the suggested change that needs to be made?

Asked by
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c202
House
House of Lords

I can assure this House that the mayor has accepted all the recommendations in that report and is enacting them now. We have asked for a report in six months’ time on how much progress has been made. We expect that there will be significant progress, including any renegotiation of those contracts.

Answered by
Baroness Swinburne (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c202
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am disappointed by the Minister’s response. In the debate, I thought that we had established that the mayor was dealing with only a limited number of the recommendations, particularly on governance. There is a whole raft of others that he did not address in his letter. Neither we nor the public in Tees Valley have heard from the Government on what they will do to ensure that proper procedures, which have been undertaken by other local authorities for generations, are adhered to in Tees Valley. Can the Minister reassure us that there will now be a tendering and procurement process that is understandable in the public sector, even though this is a public/private arrangement? Will that take place, particularly given that the Secretary of State just last week transferred to two of the development corporations set up within the Tees Valley money from the local authorities without consulting them?

Asked by
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c202
House
House of Lords

I assure the House that all procedures are being followed and, where necessary, they are being tightened as a result of the review. Therefore, where the recommendations need changes to be made, they will be made. Indeed, one of the recommendations affects DLUHC and another, more broadly, affects departments in central government. We are dealing with those now, including one for new systems of governance.

Answered by
Baroness Swinburne (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c202
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this project relates to the Government’s wider levelling-up agenda. We heard last week that only 10% of the Government’s levelling-up funds have been spent. What assessment does the Minister make of that?

Asked by
Lord Ravensdale (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c203
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his question. I already have an outstanding question from one of his colleagues on his Benches from the debate last week. I am trying to find the exact numbers for how much is in progress, given that there is lag between the money being allocated and being spent. I am chasing that and will come back to the House as soon as I have the number.

Answered by
Baroness Swinburne (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c203
House
House of Lords

My Lords, returning to the Teesworks project, in writing to the mayor—the noble Lord, Lord Houchen—the Secretary of State said:

“Improvement takes time, and where the recommendations related to cultural change especially it is important that sufficient time is given”.

But is it really right to leave a six-month hiatus? Should the Government not monitor what is happening much more regularly than that, given the level of concern expressed by the independent inquiry into what is happening at Teesworks?

Asked by
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c203
House
House of Lords

Again, I can only give an assurance that this will not be waiting for six months. A number of these actions are required immediately and are therefore ongoing. We will be monitoring it both centrally and locally.

Answered by
Baroness Swinburne (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c203
House
House of Lords

My Lords, many years ago when I was leader of a council, if I had acted in this way, I would have faced a surcharge. What sanctions are open against the mayor for the activities he has been involved in?

Asked by
Lord Watts (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c203
House
House of Lords

I need to be very clear that the review did not find any wrongdoing. Some governance issues need to be fixed; they are being fixed. On whether commissioners needed to be put in because there was wrongdoing, that is not the case in this instance. Therefore, time has being given to the combined authority to get its house in order. I am sure, as I have been assured, that it is doing so right now.

Answered by
Baroness Swinburne (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 c203
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the audit arrangements for the Teesworks project, and of whether they are effective for the scale of the work being carried out.

Asked by
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2024
Reference
837 cc201-3
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to take note of the case for local regeneration of former industrial areas across the whole United Kingdom, and the challenges constraining such regeneration, including in relation to local government. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top
Answering member
Baroness Swinburne
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Debates
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1703-1732
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a great privilege and pleasure to introduce this debate, partly, of course, because it gives me the chance to talk about the north-east again, the contribution that previous generations from that region have made to the prosperity of this country, and what we can do now—in...

Member
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1703-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Armstrong, for initiating the debate. I know she cares a great deal about these issues and the local communities they affect, many of which are in very challenged circumstances.

I start with a telling story that encapsulates what happened in one of our...

Member
Lord Mawson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1706-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the brave and challenging speech of the noble Lord, Lord Mawson. He led me to reflect on the impact of the first past the post electoral system in creating one-party states in local government, with some of the outcomes that he outlined....

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1707-1712
House
House of Lords

It is a pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Bennett of Manor Castle. I did not agree with absolutely everything she said but I welcome the fact that she has recently visited the north-east. I am glad that she gets the positive impression of the place that she has...

Member
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1712-4
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend Lady Armstrong for initiating this debate and for her powerful and moving introduction. My noble friend Lady Chapman referred to listening to her when she was a younger woman and being influenced by her. At the risk of turning this into a sketch by John...

Member
Baroness Donaghy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1714-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the place that shaped me most as a priest in the Church of England was the parish of Holy Trinity North Ormesby in Middlesbrough at the turn of the millennium, so it was a simple delight and joy to hear the noble Baroness, Lady Chapman, speak about so...

Member
Bishop of Norwich (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1715-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Armstrong, for enabling us to have this important debate. I remind the House that I am a vice-president of the Local Government Association. It has been a helpful and thought-provoking debate. Some very important points have been made and some very interesting...

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1718-1720
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate my noble friend Lady Armstrong on securing this important debate. I first met her back in 1997, after the general election; she was incredibly kind to me then and has inspired me ever since, so

I thank her for that. I thank the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1720-4
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Armstrong of Hill Top, for tabling this important debate on local regeneration of former industrial areas across the whole of the United Kingdom. We have visited a very large swathe of the United Kingdom in today’s debate, also talking about the challenges constraining such...

Member
Baroness Swinburne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1724-6
House
House of Lords

The Secretary of State made an outrageous statement this week about local authorities using consultants. They are used mostly to put together the very bids that the noble Baroness just set out. Can she please take back to the Secretary of State that it is absolutely wrong to criticise local...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 c1726
House
House of Lords

I give the noble Baroness that assurance: I will take that back to the department. It is my first week in the department, so I do not have an answer for her now, but I will speak to the civil servants and my Secretary of State.

I will continue. The settlement...

Member
Baroness Swinburne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1726-9
House
House of Lords

I in no way wish to besmirch those on the panel that conducted the report—they did what they were asked to do—but the report has raised more questions than it has answered and leaves an awful lot still in doubt. It says that

“the governance and financial management arrangements are not...

Member
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 c1728
House
House of Lords

I will certainly commit to making sure we follow up on this in detail to the noble Baroness. Given that publication is imminent, I hope we can follow up as and when that happens.

Member
Baroness Swinburne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 c1728
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 c1728
House
House of Lords

I literally have only a minute and a half to finish, and I have about seven responses.

Member
Baroness Swinburne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 c1728
House
House of Lords

I will happily wait a bit longer if that helps. As part of that letter, because the Minister has said that it is not the job of the NAO to audit this body, will she tell the House whose responsibility audit is?

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 c1728
House
House of Lords

As I have just agreed, I will come back to noble Lords with a response on this, and we can follow up in detail.

I will try to flip through a few points; I will not be able to do them justice, given that we have 45 seconds. The reality here...

Member
Baroness Swinburne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1728-1730
House
House of Lords

Can I just make a correction? I asked about not the towns fund but the levelling up fund. Maybe the Minister can write to us and just tell us what percentage of money has actually been spent, and what that might tell us about the machinery of the state and...

Member
Lord Mawson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 c1730
House
House of Lords

As a Minister in the department, I want to know that answer, so I will do that.

4.49 pm

Member
Baroness Swinburne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 c1730
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank everyone for the debate. It is probably presumptuous of me to say so, but it was refreshing to be in a debate with so many people who found their allegiance to the north-east region. It is unusual in this House so I welcome it, but I...

Member
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
836 cc1730-2
House
House of Lords

Local government stewardship: Reports and letters regarding developments in statutory interventions in Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council, Liverpool City Council and Thurrock Council and the Tees Valley Mayor’s initial response to independent review. 12p.

Deposited by
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Deposited papers
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
DEP2024-0274
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

My Honourable friend the Minister for Local Government (Simon Hoare MP) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement:

All Honourable Members will recognise the critical role local authorities play in providing services to their residents and being accountable to the communities they serve. I would like to update the House on...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Written statements
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
HLWS313
House
House of Lords

All Honourable Members will recognise the critical role local authorities play in providing services to their residents and being accountable to the communities they serve. I would like to update the House on actions the Government has taken in relation to four local authorities, which demonstrate the importance with which...

Member
Simon Hoare (Conservative)
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Written statements
Date
7 March 2024
Reference
HCWS319
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, what assessment he has made of the implications for his policies on the activities of mayoral development corporations of the judgement in the litigation taken by South Tees Development Corporation and South Tees Developments Limited against PD Teesport...

Asked by
Andy McDonald (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 February 2024
Reference
13325
House
House of Commons

I think the hon. Lady was talking about the report on Teesworks, as far as I can see. What that report noted was that the pace and scope of the regeneration had had a wide-reaching positive impact on the local economy—and of course it was an independent external report. It makes it clear that there is no evidence of corruption or illegality and the Government will of course respond to the recommendations in the report as soon as possible.

Answered by
Rishi Sunak (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
7 February 2024
Reference
745 c247
House
House of Commons

Q7

.

Liz Twist (Blaydon) (Lab):

May I take this opportunity to ask the Prime Minister if he will consider apologising to Brianna Ghey’s mother for his insensitive comment?

Turning to my question, the independent report into Teesworks released last Monday throws up more questions than it answers. It is vital that we now have a National Audit Office investigation. The report was scathing and said that there is insufficient transparency to offer evidence of value for money. Should the Government not lead by example, and will the Prime Minister finally release details of his conversations surrounding Teesworks, as he was asked to do twice last year?

Asked by
Liz Twist (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 February 2024
Reference
745 cc247-8
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government when the report commissioned by the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities in May 2023 about the activity of the Tees Valley combined authority with regard to Teesworks Ltd. and the sale of land formerly part of the Redcar Steelworks will be...

Asked by
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
HL1831
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have scrutinised the published accounts for Teesworks Ltd. in 2022–23; and what assessment they have made of the price at which the 90 acres of land were sold to Teesworks Ltd.

Asked by
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
HL1833
House
House of Lords

The Government do not agree with that position. The Audit Commission was bureaucratic; it tied up local government with tick-box exercises rather than having real value. That is why it was abolished. It is right that we have the proper processes in place to ensure proper accountability, transparency and value...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1135
House
House of Lords

My Lords, would it be reasonable for this House to expect the mayor, who, as the Minister said, is a Member of this House, to perhaps attend this debate and answer some of the questions?

Member
Lord Mackenzie of Framwellgate (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1135
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this Statement repeat is by the Government to respond on their position on this report. As I have set out, the Secretary of State has written to the mayor and asked for his response to its recommendations within six weeks. We will then consider any further steps that...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1135
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the noble Baroness, Lady Pinnock, said, there are many areas of concern that are yet to be covered by any investigation. Indeed, the report notes that many issues raised by third parties were outside the scope of its review, such as those raised regarding wildlife die-off and...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1136
House
House of Lords

I do not believe that there are any further plans to cover any further reviews.

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1136
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the report says clearly that the measures in place

“do not meet the standards expected when managing public funds”.

I have read the recommendations and I look forward to the mayor’s response to them. Does the Minister think that, outside of the mayor’s response, the Government have a duty to...

Member
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1136
House
House of Lords

I say to the noble Baroness that we have considered the panel’s findings against the draft best value guidance, which was published in July 2023, and concluded that they do not meet the test for urgent intervention. The panel makes a number of recommendations for the combined authority, the development...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1136
House
House of Lords

The Minister has mentioned a number of benefits—and no one disputes that regeneration benefits are required—but does she accept that those benefits have come totally on the back of public sector investment and that, as the report says, no private sector investment has gone towards them, yet still the liabilities...

Member
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1136
House
House of Lords

The reality is that a project of this size will require significant public sector investment, which has taken place, but the review is also clear that remediation of this size and scale would not be able to

take place without private partners also participating. We are making sure that we...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1136
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness, Lady Ford, asked about the lack of the audit function in local authorities. The Minister said that the Government had put “processes in place” to replace the Audit Commission. Can she explain what those processes are, and whether they will now be involved in investigating...

Member
Lord Lennie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1137
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Audit Commission regulated, micro-managed and inspected local councils, forcing them to spend time ticking boxes and filling in forms rather than getting on with the business of local government. It hindered transparency and scrutiny. Local government can put in its own systems of local authority financial reporting...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1137
House
House of Lords

I have not heard anyone advocating for the Audit Commission; what we have been saying is that, since the Audit Commission went, the private sector auditors who have been appointed have struggled to deal with the complexities of joint venture auditing. That is the issue. With that in mind, will...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1137
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that I will have to disappoint the noble Baroness on her first question. We will not be referring this matter to the NAO. However, as I said in my initial response, the NAO has said that it will reflect on the findings of the review for its...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1137
House
House of Lords

Lords statement on the independent review into the South Tees Development Corporation and the Teesworks joint venture, which the Government are publishing today, having received the final report last week.

Lead member
Baroness Penn
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 cc1124-1137
House
House of Lords

My Lords, at the heart of this issue are the people of Teesside and the public asset formerly owned by them, which should be regenerated for their benefit, to generate jobs, employment and industry. They should also be receiving sufficient return for their investment of land and the other value...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 cc1124-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for the Statement. What a sad state of affairs it is that a vital and very large regeneration project in the north-east of England has to be the subject of an independent government review because of justified public criticism and concern.

The Financial Times and...

Member
Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 cc1128-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank both noble Baronesses for their questions. Before I turn to the specific points, it is worth reminding the House of the context of both the review and the work being done in Tees Valley by the development corporation.

Remediating and regenerating the former Redcar steelworks is a...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 cc1129-1132
House
House of Lords

The Minister said it was not the National Audit Office’s role to investigate individual authorities—or something like that—but the report has revealed at least massive financial mismanagement of this project. It seems that, since the report was published, further calls to the National Audit Office to investigate this have been...

Member
Lord Lennie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1131
House
House of Lords

My answer is the same as before: the Secretary of State, at the time of the review, considered the suggestion that the NAO undertake the review. But it is not its role to audit or examine individual local authorities, and its powers would not normally be used for that purpose....

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1131
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I very much welcome the Minister’s Statement and the robust and comprehensive report of the panel. Does she agree that, particularly in the other place, elected representatives have a special responsibility to judiciously use parliamentary privilege? I think I can say that as a former Member of the...

Member
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1131
House
House of Lords

I agree with my noble friend that it is a matter of regret that those allegations were made, in the terms that they were made. It is incredibly serious to allege corruption and illegality. The findings of the review are absolutely clear on this; the review found no evidence of...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1131
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am afraid that allegations of illegality and corruption were not the only allegations that led to this review. There were also allegations of a lack of transparency and—as a taxpayer in Tees Valley myself; my family have lived there for generations—there is a great deal of concern...

Member
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1131
House
House of Lords

As I said in my original response, the Government welcome the recommendations on strengthening governance and transparency. We welcome the oversight that this review has provided in those terms. I think the noble Baroness might be referring to the fact that the government official is a member of the board...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1133
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I would like to directly quote from the report because the devil is always in the detail:

“The JV partners are clearly astute, commercial businessmen. They have a clear business model whereby they support distressed businesses and do not accept liabilities until they are satisfied they can hedge investment...

Member
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1133
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I have set out, there have already been clear public benefits to the redevelopment in Teesside. On the question of involving private partners in this work, the report sets out very clearly that the business case was clear: public sector funding would not be sufficient to complete...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1133
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the Government on the investment they have made and for the review panel they held. I will ask a slightly different question. Those of us in North Yorkshire feel a little like the poor relations, because a lot of investment has gone into Tees Valley. We...

Member
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1133
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the decision to set up the North Yorkshire and York Mayoral Combined Authority was taken in combination with the elected representatives and local councils in that area, which all agreed to it. Part of those discussions was around funding, and it is right that we take forward what...

Member
Baroness Penn (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1134
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister accept that the Oral Statement is all but a total whitewash? None of the issues raised in questions to the Minister was covered in it. Can she specifically explain what the issues were that resulted in the Secretary of State requesting the panel to make recommendations on...

Member
Baroness Bryan of Partick (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2024
Reference
835 c1134
House
House of Lords