Skip to main content

1-100 of 2,667 results for subject:Partnerships

Type

-
Early day motions (6)
+ Legislation (114) + Acts (14)
-
Public acts (14)
+ Bills (15) + Public bills (15)
-
Government bills (15)
+ Delegated legislation (85) + Statutory instruments (85)
-
Legislative reform orders (2)
-
Regulatory reform orders (3)
+ Members' contributions (1,896)
-
Oral answers to questions (11)
+ Oral questions (11)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,874)
+ Parliamentary committees (134) + Committee proceedings (103)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (6)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (30)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (46)
-
Second Reading Committee proceedings (3)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (11)
-
Select Committee reports (20)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (6)
-
Select Committee written evidence (6)
+ Parliamentary papers (249)
-
Annual reports (3)
-
Command papers (5)
-
Consultation papers (23)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (4)
-
Deposited papers (194)
-
House of Commons papers (38)
-
House of Lords papers (5)
-
Impact assessments (9)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (210) + Debates (155) + Committee proceedings (103)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (6)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (30)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (46)
-
Second Reading Committee proceedings (3)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (11)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (143)
-
Debates on bills (86)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (57)
+ Formal proceedings (7)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (3)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (4)
+ Statements (44) + Oral statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (1)
-
Written statements (43)
+ Written corrections (1)
-
Ministerial corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (200) + Oral questions (11)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Written questions (189)
+ Research briefings (11) + Commons Briefing papers (8)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (2)
+ Lords Library Briefings (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Blair McDougall
Answering member
Gareth Davies
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Seventh Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
1 July 2026
House
House of Commons

This paper outlines the current regulation of doorstep selling (or cold calling) under the provisions of the Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013. It also provides information on how 'No Cold Calling Zones' work in practice.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
17 June 2026
Reference
SN05632
Laid by
Secretary Peter Kyle
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
1 June 2026
Reference
SI 2026/778; 2026/
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the answer of of 7 May 2025 to question 48538, what the timetable is for the Crown Estate negotiating a Partnership Agreement with GB Energy.

Asked by
James Wild (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 December 2025
Reference
96700
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she has made an estimate of the potential annual income from introducing employers’ National Insurance contributions for General Practice partners.

Asked by
Luke Evans (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 November 2025
Reference
85890
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate she has made of the number of General Practice partners who do not pay employers’ National Insurance contributions due to the partnership funding model.

Asked by
Luke Evans (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 November 2025
Reference
85887
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of introducing employers’ National Insurance contributions for General Practice partners on retention.

Asked by
Luke Evans (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 November 2025
Reference
85891
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Blair McDougall
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
30 October 2025
Reference
SI 2025/1137
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether he has made an assessment of the potential impact of the Octopus Energy partnership with Ming Yang on national security.

Asked by
Navendu Mishra (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 October 2025
Reference
83941
House
House of Commons

Motions to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Justin Madders
Answering member
Harriett Baldwin
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Sixth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
2 September 2025
House
House of Commons

The UK Government is reforming Companies House and the company registration regime in the UK. This briefing looks at the company regime and the ongoing reforms.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
8 August 2025
Reference
CBP-10015

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of continuing to pursue partnerships with Chinese Defence Universities.

Asked by
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 May 2025
Reference
48907
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what progress has been made on negotiating a partnership agreement between the Crown Estate and Great British Energy.

Asked by
James Wild (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 May 2025
Reference
48538
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Business and Trade Committee
Notes
Sub-Committee on Economic Security, Arms and Export Controls
Date
22 April 2025
Reference
HC 798 2024-26
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, how many partnerships with Great British Energy are currently in place; and what the total value is of those partnerships.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 April 2025
Reference
43806
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Business and Trade Committee
Notes
Sub-Committee on Economic Security, Arms and Export Controls
Date
28 March 2025
Reference
HC 798 2024-26
House
House of Commons

A Westminster Hall debate on SME participation in defence procurement is scheduled for Tuesday 28 January 2025, from 4:30pm to 5:30pm. The debate will be led by Alan Strickland MP.

Type
Commons Debate packs
Date
23 January 2025
Reference
CDP-2025-0020

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, with reference to the oral contribution of the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy during the Twelfth sitting of the Public Bill Committee on the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill on Tuesday 15 November 2022,...

Asked by
Baroness Hodge of Barking (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 March 2024
Reference
18022
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, with reference to the oral contribution of the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy during the Twelfth sitting of the Public Bill Committee on the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill on Tuesday 15 November 2022,...

Asked by
Baroness Hodge of Barking (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 March 2024
Reference
18021
House
House of Commons

Motions to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Kevin Hollinrake
Answering member
Justin Madders
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Second Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
26 February 2024
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
26 October 2023
Reference
CHAP 56 2023; 2023 c. 56

Consideration of Lords message. After Clause 180, Amendment 151A discussed with Lords amendments 151E, 151F and amendment (a). Amendment (a) negatived on division (208 to 274). Motion to disagree to Lords amendments 151E and 151F. Agreed to on division (280 to 207). Motion to insist on Government amendment 161A in...

Lead member
Kevin Hollinrake
Answering member
Rushanara Ali
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on bills
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 cc836-866
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House insists on its amendment 151A and disagrees with the Lords in their amendments 151E and 151F.

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c838
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to bring this important Bill back to the House this afternoon, for what I sincerely hope is the last time, given that this will be the third time we have debated and voted on similar issues. I urge Opposition Front-Bench Members and those in the other place...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 cc838-9
House
House of Commons

The Minister said clearly that there has been consultation with Scotland and Northern Ireland. Will he indicate who those discussions have taken place with? Was it banks, or the Departments looking after matters in the absence of a functioning Northern Ireland Assembly? I am keen to know who does the...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c840
House
House of Commons

That is a good point. There are clearly different legal jurisdictions in Northern Ireland and Scotland, with of course the Court of Session in Scotland. From a legal perspective, the counsel in those jurisdictions are the people who discuss this. In wider issues such as failure to prevent, banks and...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c840
House
House of Commons

The reason I asked the question is quite specific, although it might not necessarily relate to the issue directly. The Minister refers to banks. A number of local organisations and community groups back home, which are registered and constituted as community institutions, have had their bank accounts closed. Banks have...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c840
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman raises a very important issue relating to the concerns about de-banking that we have across the economy. The Economic Secretary to the Treasury, my hon. Friend the Member for Arundel and South Downs (Andrew Griffith) is looking at it, as is the Treasury. In future, it is...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c840
House
House of Commons

It is an honour to speak on the Bill again. I was hoping that we could conclude the proceedings on the Bill as soon as possible and it is disappointing that the Government are yet to make further compromises. The Bill is welcome in principle, but it should not have...

Member
Rushanara Ali (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 cc840-1
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c841
House
House of Commons

If the Minister is brief, rather than talking the Bill out like he did last time, I will give way.

Member
Rushanara Ali (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c841
House
House of Commons

I will be very brief. On the question of compromise, the hon. Lady will have noticed that there was no “failure to prevent” offence when the legislation was first tabled, nor was there an identification doctrine. There has been significant compromise on the Government side. Our preference, clearly, is to...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c841
House
House of Commons

When the Minister was a Back Bencher, he was a powerful advocate on the very issues we are discussing today. It is a shame he has been muzzled, but I appreciate that he is in a difficult position. I hope we can have some comprise, but clearly he has not...

Member
Rushanara Ali (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 cc842-3
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c843
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. I just want to be clear about this. I assume that we can speak until 1.51 pm, and vote after that. Is that correct?

Member
Baroness Hodge of Barking (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c843
House
House of Commons

There has been a great deal of improvement in the Bill, and much of its content is welcome. I recognise that,

and I also recognise what the Minister has said, but I am sorry to say that the dead hand of the Treasury has yet again got in the way...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 cc843-4
House
House of Commons

It was a point underlined when we heard public evidence on the Bill. People explained to us how a number of different smaller companies might well be set up to become conduits for fraud.

Member
Liam Byrne (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c844
House
House of Commons

That is a compelling point, and it accords with the evidence that the Justice Committee was given in relation to our inquiry into fraud in the justice system. The irony is that the Government’s current stance may well create a perverse incentive. That is certainly not what the Minister wants,...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c844
House
House of Commons

I knew that when you referred to us all as distinguished and experienced Members you did not mean me, Madam Deputy Speaker.

This is the third time we have been back here, and I think it incumbent on the Government to listen to the Lords. They have made it clear that...

Member
Alison Thewliss (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c845
House
House of Commons

I will certainly remember your exhortation to brevity, Madam Deputy Speaker. As you know, that is something of a challenge for me at the best of times.

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c845
House
House of Commons

No, no.

Member
Lord Gove (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c845
House
House of Commons

I think my right hon. Friend may suffer from the same affliction, dare I say; but I will draw a veil of charity over that.

My hon. Friend—and my friend—the Minister has campaigned assiduously with us in the trenches on this issue for many years. I yield to none in my...

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 cc845-7
House
House of Commons

This is another leg in a long journey. I want to focus on the amendment that stands in my name, which is supported by the right hon. and learned Member for South Swindon (Sir Robert Buckland) and the hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Sir Robert Neill).

May I place on...

Member
Baroness Hodge of Barking (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 cc846-8
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Lady is making very important points. However, the “failure to prevent” offence, as drafted, would not cover that situation, because it covers only situations where the benefit is to the corporation concerned or an officer within it. A situation in which a third party hijacked systems would...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c849
House
House of Commons

That is an interesting point. The simple response is that, obviously, the drafting of the “failure to prevent” offence needs further improvement to ensure that it covers that sort of instance.

There were similar arguments about the burden on SMEs when we introduced the Bribery Act 2010. In 2015, a survey...

Member
Baroness Hodge of Barking (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c849
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak in favour of the amendment tabled by my right hon. Friend the Member for Barking (Dame Margaret Hodge), which gives me an opportunity to thank her for her extraordinary leadership on this agenda. Our country is safer and stronger for the work that she has helped...

Member
Liam Byrne (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 cc849-851
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. Friend not agree that if we are to have a successful financial services sector, we will never get it on the back of dirty money? Therefore, it is ever more important that, in relation to both fraud and money laundering, we have a “failure to prevent”...

Member
Baroness Hodge of Barking (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c851
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is absolutely right. This is a point of cross-party consensus. I know it is a point of cross-party consensus because it was the Minister who used to use precisely the same argument to argue for some of the changes that we see in the Bill.

We all...

Member
Liam Byrne (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c851
House
House of Commons

With the leave of the House, I wish to thank Members who have contributed to the debate. We have much in common, despite the fact that some small differences still remain. As I said earlier, the Government have come a long way since the original tabling of the legislation. The...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 cc851-2
House
House of Commons

Perhaps the Minister can tell me what he means when he says that he will keep this matter under review. What precisely does that mean?

Member
Baroness Hodge of Barking (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c852
House
House of Commons

The way that we have legislated here, and the reason for doing so in that way, have always been informed by information that has come from third parties—from Spotlight on Corruption, Transparency International and others—that have been interested in the Bill. The right hon. Lady and I have worked together...

Member
Kevin Hollinrake (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 cc852-3
House
House of Commons

Shame! Name them!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 c853
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. As you know, the House will later vote on the issue of the hon. Member for Wellingborough (Mr Bone) and the Independent Expert Panel’s report. Of course, we do not have a chance to debate the issue, the content, or the pros...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2023
Reference
738 cc853-866
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Health and Social Care Committee
Date
19 July 2023
Reference
HC 1751 2022-23
House
House of Commons

Lords report stage first day. Amendments 1 to 15 agreed to. Amendment 16 agreed to on division (218 to 175). Amendments 18, 20 to 32, 34 to 48, 50 to 56, 58 to 62, 64 to 68, 71 agreed to. Amendment 72 agreed to on division (172 to 153). Amendment...

Lead member
Lord Johnson of Lainston
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede; Baroness Blake of Leeds
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on bills
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc122-202
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Johnson of Lainston

1: Clause 1, page 2, line 8, leave out from “to” to “a” on line 9 and insert “ensure that records kept by the registrar do not create”

Member’s explanatory statement

This brings the wording of objective 3 into line with objectives 1 and 2.

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c122
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before we begin proceedings, I draw your Lordships’ attention to my interests as set out in the register of interests, including as a director and person with significant control of AMP Ventures Ltd, a person with significant control of Cigarkeep and as a shareholder of several other companies,...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc122-130
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there seems to be a gap, so I will happily fill it. I remind the House of my declaration of interests in the register, which discloses that I am a director of a number of private and public companies, and I am a person with significant control of...

Member
Lord Leigh of Hurley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c129
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend the Minister for all the engagement and patience he has shown over the last few weeks and months, not just with me but with a wide congregation. We now have something that is much better than when it began its journey through the...

Member
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c131
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for my croakiness; the hay fever is definitely winning. I join others in welcoming, in these government amendments, that we have seen significant change since Committee. It is worth highlighting a couple of comments from the Minister’s introduction. He said that the aim of the Bill...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c131
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are political Bills, where the House divides on political issues and argues among itself, and there are Bills of practical importance, when the House can come together and pull in the same direction. We will not all agree about everything, but the motives behind what we are...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc131-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I add my thanks to the Ministers for their regular updates, and the access we have had to their officials. The ability to meet the team from Companies House was particularly helpful and instructive. I too believe that we have a better Bill before us.

Having said that, we...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c132
House
House of Lords

I am extremely grateful to all noble Lords who participated in this debate. I shall answer their questions in order.

The financial guru, my noble friend Lord Leigh of Hurley, pointed to Amendment 40. He is right that it does not specifically mention submitting misleading information—this is related specifically to the...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc132-4
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Johnson of Lainston

2: Clause 1, page 2, leave out lines 11 to 13 and insert—

“Objective 4 is to prevent companies and others from—

(a) carrying out unlawful activities, or

(b) facilitating the carrying out by others of unlawful activities.”

Member’s explanatory statement

At the moment the registrar’s fourth objective is to minimise...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c135
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Johnson of Lainston

3: Clause 4, page 4, line 7, leave out “206(7)” and insert “207(1)”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment corrects a cross-reference in Clause 4 of the Bill.

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c135
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Johnson of Lainston

4: Clause 30, page 22, line 8, leave out from second “the” to end of line 9 and insert “meaning given by section 1060(3) of the Companies Act 2006.”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment changes the definition of “the registrar” so it does not refer to the Companies...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c135
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Johnson of Lainston

5: Clause 36, page 26, leave out line 26 and insert “and Article 15A of the Company Directors Disqualification (Northern Ireland) Order 2002 (see section 3A of the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018)”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment makes it clear that a person who is subject...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c135
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendments in this group relate to the new director disqualification sanctions measure introduced in Committee. This measure created a completely new type of sanction in the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 called director disqualification sanctions. It will be unlawful for a designated person subject to this...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc135-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, again this is a group of amendments with which we can thoroughly agree, which is a nice position to be in. Government Amendments 5 to 11 speak for themselves in the sense of tidying up the situation in Northern Ireland. The one amendment that is worth dwelling on...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c137
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we agree with all the amendments in this group. This group is all government amendments which make

minor changes to ensure that penalties align with previous legislation, that they are taken into account when setting fees and that penalties do not stop criminal proceedings, as the noble Lord...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc137-8
House
House of Lords

As always, I am extremely grateful to noble Lords for their interventions and the points raised in debate.

I turn to government Amendment 50. It is not a technical point, but it would not, in my view, be a point of significant consequence. It is just to ensure that when the...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc138-9
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Johnson of Lainston

6: Clause 36, page 27, leave out lines 4 to 15 and insert “where—

(i) the instructions are given by a person whom they know at that time to be subject to director disqualification sanctions (within the meaning of section 11A),

(ii) the giving of the instructions does...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc139-140
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Johnson of Lainston

8: Clause 38, page 28, line 24, leave out “(see section 3A of that Act)” and insert “and section 11A of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (see section 3A of the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018)”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment makes it clear that a...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc140-1
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Johnson of Lainston

12: Clause 46, page 35, line 29, after “changes” insert “and, at the time of the change, it is a non-traded company”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment means that only non-traded companies are required to keep old information about their members (eg old addresses).

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c141
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before we turn to the amendments tabled by my noble friend Lord Agnew of Oulton and the noble Lord, Lord Vaux of Harrowden, I shall briefly outline government Amendments 12, 13, 14 and 15 in this group. Clause 46(4) amends Section 113 of the Companies Act 2006, including...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc141-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to the amendments in this group in my name, Amendments 16 and 17. I should remind the House of my interest in the register as a non-practising member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. I also take the opportunity, since it...

Member
Lord Vaux of Harrowden (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc142-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendments 16 and 17 from the noble Lord, Lord Vaux. I shall also speak to my Amendment 19.

I do not want to repeat everything that the noble Lord has said, but I received a letter from my noble friend the Minister yesterday on this subject that...

Member
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c143
House
House of Lords

I shall speak to Amendment 16, to which I have added my name, and I support the noble Lord, Lord Vaux, in his clear outline as to why this is an elegant solution. It is so because it would push the onus on to the supplier of the service and...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc143-6
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his comments on the government amendments. We support Amendments 16, 17 and 19. They would significantly help improve the integrity of the register. This issue has been raised in amendments throughout the passage of the Bill. While we welcome many of the other changes that...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c146
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Vaux of Harrowden, and my noble friend Lord Agnew of Oulton for their amendments. If noble Lords allow me to, I will just set the scene.

We have made some significant advances in understanding who is behind a company and who is running these organisations,...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc146-151
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Johnson of Lainston

13: Clause 46, page 35, line 30, leave out “that” and insert “the fact that the information has changed”

Member’s explanatory statement

This is consequential on my amendment to Clause 46, page 35, line 29.

14: Clause 46, page 35, line 38, at end insert—

“(6B) Where any of the...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c148
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Vaux of Harrowden

16: Clause 46, page 36, line 14, at end insert—

“113BA Required information about members: nominees

The required information about a member includes a statement by the individual, or where the member is a body corporate, or a firm that is a legal person under the law by...

Member
Lord Vaux of Harrowden (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c152
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his response and for his undertakings to bring further amendments at Third Reading. I will make just a few comments. First, in terms of Amendment 17, which I do not intend to move, I find the concept that it is going to cost...

Member
Lord Vaux of Harrowden (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc152-3
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Johnson of Lainston

18: Schedule 2, page 200, line 15, leave out “206(7)” and insert “207(1)”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment corrects a cross-reference in Schedule 2 to the Bill.

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c156
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Johnson of Lainston

20: After Clause 55, insert the following new Clause—

“Use or disclosure of profit and loss accounts for certain companies

(1) The Companies Act 2006 is amended as follows.

(2) After section 468 insert—

“468A Use or disclosure of profit and loss accounts for certain companies

(1) The Secretary of State...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc156-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, government Amendment 20 will give the Secretary of State the ability to make regulations to specify what aspects of the profit and loss account delivered by companies that qualify as micro-entities or small companies might be withheld from public inspection. Such regulations would also set out the parameters...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc157-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have discussed this concept of disclosure at earlier stages. Of course, if a person does not want anything disclosed, they could become a sole trader or a limited liability partnership or a partnership, in which case very little, if anything, needs to be disclosed. My question and...

Member
Lord Leigh of Hurley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c158
House
House of Lords

My Lords, may I very briefly support what the noble Lord, Lord Leigh, has just said? This amendment troubles me a little bit. The Companies House information is important for people who are dealing with those companies, be they suppliers or customers. When we were doing the inquiry into digital...

Member
Lord Vaux of Harrowden (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c158
House
House of Lords

I have nothing to add.

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c159
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend Lord Leigh and the noble Lord, Lord Vaux, for their comments. It is absolutely right that we have this brief discussion about this point. Just to reaffirm, the intention of the amendment is not to suppress information or increase opacity. It is to give the...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c159
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Johnson of Lainston

21: Clause 63, page 54, line 20, leave out “under section 1110A(1)(b) or”

Member’s explanatory statement

This has the effect that the registrar is required to make verification statements available for public inspection. A “verification statement” is the statement that an authorised corporate service provider is required to...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c159
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as we discussed in Committee, identity verification is at the heart of the reforms in this Bill. It is essential that the framework for this is robust and reliable, including the role of authorised corporate service providers. I am therefore grateful for noble Lords’ continued input to

ensure...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc159-162
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for a very comprehensive set of government amendments. He has completely revolutionised the impact of the Bill in relation to ACSPs. I congratulate him and his staff on that. It is important to remind noble Lords about why this is so important. Around half...

Member
Lord Agnew of Oulton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c162
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I also thank the Minister for having listened to the points that were made in our previous debates about the importance of ACSPs’ verification statements being made publicly available and for making this comprehensive suite of amendments. Indeed, I think he has gone further than my original amendments...

Member
Lord Vaux of Harrowden (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c162
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister and congratulate him on this suite of amendments. I know that my noble friend is keen that this should be a really landmark Bill and that he has

worked really hard to listen carefully and ensure that it is as robust as it can...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c162
House
House of Lords

Although my noble friend the Minister has described me in very flattering terms today, for which I am grateful, I will not add to the flattery, as his noble kinsman is no longer sitting next to me. I just want to add a note of caution, because it is on...

Member
Lord Leigh of Hurley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c163
House
House of Lords

The Minister will be blushing with the fulsome praise that he has received. I think he described it as a significant package of improvements and as major steps. The noble Lord, Lord Agnew, went further and described them as revolutionary changes. The Minister can be sure that he has hit...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c163
House
House of Lords

I rise just to add our support for the amendments. I emphasise the concern that has been raised in Amendment 93 from the noble Lord, Lord Agnew, in terms of recognising the significant function that HMRC has. I listened to the noble Lord, Lord Leigh, with interest. I think there...

Member
Baroness Blake of Leeds (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c163
House
House of Lords

I thank all noble Lords who have spoken during this debate, and I am grateful, personally, for the kindness they have shown to me as a new Minister on this Bill over the last few months. I am grateful for the high degree of collaboration and the sense of common...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 cc163-5
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Johnson of Lainston

22: Clause 63, page 54, line 34, at end insert—

“(2A) A verification statement must also specify the authorised corporate service provider’s supervisory authority or authorities for the purposes of the Money Laundering Regulations.

(2B) The Secretary of State may by regulations make further provision about the contents...

Member
Lord Johnson of Lainston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2023
Reference
831 c165
House
House of Lords