Skip to main content

1-100 of 6,390 results for subject:Cybercrime

Type

-
Early day motions (3)
+ Legislation (15) + Acts (3)
-
Public acts (3)
+ Bills (6) + Public bills (6)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (4)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (2)
+ Delegated legislation (6)
-
Statutory instruments (6)
+ Members' contributions (4,934)
-
Business questions (8)
-
Maiden speeches (9)
-
Oral answers to questions (241)
-
Oral question time interventions (7)
+ Oral questions (241)
-
Prime Minister's questions (2)
-
Topical questions (29)
-
Points of order (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (4,445)
+ Parliamentary committees (207) + Committee proceedings (76)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (2)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (3)
-
European Committee proceedings (5)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (14)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (49)
-
Select Committee reports (46)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (30)
-
Select Committee written evidence (63)
+ Parliamentary papers (249)
-
Annual reports (10)
-
Command papers (28)
-
Consultation papers (4)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (4)
-
Deposited papers (92)
-
House of Commons papers (117)
-
House of Lords papers (17)
-
Impact assessments (1)
-
Treaties (3)
-
Unprinted papers (1)
-
White papers (3)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (277) + Debates (156)
-
Adjournment debates (8)
-
Backbench debates (11)
+ Committee proceedings (76)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (2)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (3)
-
European Committee proceedings (5)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (14)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (49)
-
Debates on select committee reports (10)
-
Estimates days (1)
+ Legislative debates (40)
-
Debates on bills (33)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (7)
+ Monarch's speech debates (4)
-
Queen's speech debates (4)
-
Opposition days (3)
-
Questions for short debate (3)
+ Formal proceedings (2)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (2)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (115) + Oral statements (26)
-
Ministerial statements (23)
-
Select Committee statements (2)
-
Speaker's statements (1)
-
Written statements (89)
-
Urgent questions (4)
+ Written corrections (1)
-
Ministerial corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (1,132)
-
Business questions (8)
+ Oral questions (241)
-
Prime Minister's questions (2)
-
Topical questions (29)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (4)
-
Written questions (878)
+ Research briefings (33) + Commons Briefing papers (10)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (6)
+ Lords Library Briefings (4)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (1)
-
POSTbriefs (1)
-
POSTnotes (12)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what support and guidance her Department provides to young male victims of online exploitation.

Asked by
Shivani Raja (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
15 September 2026
Reference
30045
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to page 50 of the Defence Investment Plan, published on 30 June 2026, how many of the over 90,000 annual cyber attacks on Defence systems were assessed as (a) serious and (b) successful in the 12 months to September 2026.

Asked by
David Reed (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 September 2026
Reference
26830
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to page 50 of the Defence Investment Plan, published on 30 June 2026, which (a) state and (b) non-state actors are responsible for cyber attacks on Defence systems.

Asked by
David Reed (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 September 2026
Reference
26831
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether her Department will name the power generation facility reportedly shut down for four days in July 2026 as a result of a cyber attack, and whether her Department's assessment attributes that attack to a state or state-linked...

Asked by
David Reed (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
25230
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many nationally significant cyber-attacks occurred in (a) 2025 and (b) 2026.

Asked by
Stuart Anderson (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
21494
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to investigate the claims by the leader of Reform UK of cyber-hacking by Russian hostile actors.

Asked by
Baroness Finn (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
HL3241
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what estimate he has made of the cost of the 2022 LockBit attack on NHS 111 and other patient services.

Asked by
Graeme Downie (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
19663
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many Ministry of Defence personnel were affected by the reported cyberattack that compromised data associated with the Police National Legal Database and related systems.

Asked by
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
21363
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, how many households' energy needs are met, on average, by the power generation facility reportedly shut down for four days in July 2026 as a result of a cyber attack.

Asked by
David Reed (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
25232
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what support (a) her Department, (b) the National Cyber Security Centre and (c) other government bodies provided to the operator of the power generation facility reportedly shut down for four days in July 2026 as a result of...

Asked by
David Reed (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
25231
House
House of Commons

Moved by

Baroness Hoey

16: After Clause 12, insert the following new Clause—

“Claims management services: Northern Ireland

(1) The Treasury may by regulations made by statutory instrument make provision for claims management services provided in, from or into Northern Ireland to be regulated under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 on a...

Member
Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c518
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment follows on from the amendment tabled in Committee by the noble Lord, Lord Hunt of Wirral. I am bringing the House’s attention to a growing and deeply concerning problem in Northern Ireland’s insurance market. The

market is shrinking in insurer capacity, it is becoming less competitive,...

Member
Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc518-520
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendment in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Hoey. It is well thought through, balanced and modest. The House will be relieved that, for once, neither I nor the noble Baroness, Lady Hoey, are even mentioning the Northern Ireland protocol or the Windsor Framework...

Member
Lord Weir of Ballyholme (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc521-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, taking up the last point from the noble Lord, Lord Weir, the Prime Minister, on his recent visits and tour of the UK, has emphasised that the primary focus of the Government is to help people with the cost of living. Because our population in Northern Ireland is...

Member
Lord Empey (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc522-3
House
House of Lords

I support the noble Baroness, Lady Hoey, and the noble Lords, Lord Weir of Ballyholme and Lord Empey. In doing so, I declare my interest as past chairman of the British Insurance Brokers’ Association and a practising solicitor in the City of London.

We have campaigned within the broking community for...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c523
House
House of Lords

My Lords, notwithstanding the anomalies that have been discussed—there are significant anomalies in insurance in England as well—we have some concerns about this amendment. It would hand the Treasury very extensive powers to act through secondary legislation, including the ability to amend primary legislation. We have raised concerns consistently in...

Member
Lord Altrincham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c523
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 16 would give the Treasury the power to extend regulation of claims management activity to Northern Ireland through secondary legislation. I am aware of the concerns relating to high insurance costs across the UK and would be supportive of action to tackle these where we can, but...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc523-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there I was thinking that we had a Minister who was going to be much more reassuring, but, in fact, that was a very negative response. All the things he said have already happened and could be happening in more detail if the Government were to move forward...

Member
Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c524
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Kramer

17: After Clause 13, insert the following new Clause—

“Reimbursement of fraud: liability of technology companies

(1) The FCA must make rules providing that, where a person is to be reimbursed in respect of losses arising from an authorised push payment fraud, the cost of that reimbursement is to be...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc524-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, let me address Amendment 17 in my name, which is also signed by the noble Lord, Lord Vaux, which I very much appreciate. It addresses authorised push payment fraud and would require the tech companies whose platforms are host to this fraud to share in the reimbursement of...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c525
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have added my name in support of Amendment 17, which the noble Baroness, Lady Kramer has already explained, I have also tabled Amendment 19. Both amendments relate to the continuing problem of fraud. As noble Lords are probably aware, the last Financial Services and Markets Act led...

Member
Lord Vaux of Harrowden (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc526-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my Amendment 95 raises the issue of non-compete legislation. When this was raised in Committee, the Minister undertook to respond. His response was to refer to a 2025 working paper, but action is needed. Could I urge the Minister to pursue this and not to allow the report...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c527
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak to Amendment 97, which appears in this group in my name. I commend the noble Baroness, Lady Kramer, and the noble Lord, Lord Vaux, for providing us with powerful arguments, particularly for Amendment 17. I echo the noble Lord’s comments as, if the noble Baroness wishes...

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc527-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are concerned about the scale of fraud, and in particular by the continued growth of authorised push payment fraud and other forms of online economic crime. The Government and the banks have made progress, but the truth is that it is hard to keep up with the...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc529-530
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before I respond, I must start with a correction. In the third debate, I said that commercial credit data-sharing schemes improve bank referrals and strengthen personal lending. However, the CCDS and the bank referral scheme are different schemes. To correct the record, I meant that the Government are...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc530-1
House
House of Lords

I am terribly sorry to interrupt the Minister, but perhaps he could explain why the FCA has stopped the reports that the PSR was previously providing.

Member
Lord Vaux of Harrowden (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c531
House
House of Lords

I am unable to answer the noble Lord’s question; might I write to him with an answer?

Amendment 20 was discussed in Committee and the Government’s position remains unchanged. As set out in Committee, a range of measures is already in place and further work is under way across government, regulators...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc531-2
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, can I ask for a potential timeframe on when the noble Lord expects to see progress on that work in the Home Office?

Member
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c532
House
House of Lords

Again, if the noble Baroness will accept it, I will write to her on that. I do not know the timetable offhand.

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c532
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the online platforms know exactly what they have to do to stop online fraud; they are just choosing not to do it. The Government say that the answer will come from Ofcom, but that has certainly not worried the platforms one iota. The platforms will take notice only...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c532
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Pitt-Watson

18: Schedule 2, page 78, leave out lines 27 to 30

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would remove a subsection which duplicates section 131Z19 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (inserted by paragraph 18 of Schedule 2).

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc532-4
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Pitt-Watson

21: Schedule 2, page 83, line 5, leave out “131Z12, 131Z13 or 131Z14” and insert “131Z13, 131Z14 or 131Z15”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would correct a cross-reference.

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c534
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Pitt-Watson

22: Schedule 2, page 85, line 13, at end insert “, and

(ii) in its application as a secondary objective, the objective set out in section 30J(1) of the Bank of England Act 1998 (payment systems etc: innovation).”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment is consequential on the amendment in the name...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c534
House
House of Lords

In moving my Amendment 22, I will also speak to government Amendments 58 and 59. Amendment 22 is developed from our discussions in Committee.

Payment systems are essential national infrastructure. They allow households to pay bills, businesses to trade and financial institutions to transfer funds securely. As technology changes how we...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc534-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have a couple of very brief comments. I am comfortable with the amendments that the Minister has just described, but I have one note of caution. The drive for innovation, which we all think is a good thing, in many ways also increasingly exposes the UK to...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c535
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we welcome these amendments and the movement from the Government on this important issue. I look forward to the Bank of England’s first report on its innovation objective and hope that it will help to drive much-needed growth in the economy. I am sure that the reports will...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c536
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Pitt-Watson

23: Schedule 2, page 93, line 6, at end insert—

“(aa) in paragraph 2(3), omit

“, (ca)”

;”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would remove a cross-reference to the paragraph omitted by paragraph 58(a) of Schedule 2.

24: Schedule 2, page 93, line 7, leave out “2(3)” and insert “3(7)”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c536
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Kramer

26: After Clause 14, insert the following new Clause—

“Anti-money laundering: provision of support to professional services firms

(1) Within three months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Treasury must publish an assessment of the arrangements that will be made to provide education, guidance and compliance...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c536
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am afraid that all the amendments in this group are mine. Amendment 29 has also been signed by the noble Lord, Lord Vaux, for which I am most grateful. I will be brief as the hour is late.

In this Bill, the Government will transfer all supervision of...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c537
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the noble Baroness, Lady Kramer, on her Amendment 29, to which I have added my name. The noble Baroness has already explained with her usual clarity the concerns that lie behind this group of amendments so I will try not to repeat what she said.

The changes...

Member
Lord Vaux of Harrowden (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc537-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these amendments reflect a number of important concerns about the proposed transfer of anti-money laundering supervision to the FCA. We do not believe that each of these points requires legislative commitment. However, we have also been made aware of serious concerns from industry about how this transition is...

Member
Lord Altrincham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc538-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Kramer, for tabling these amendments concerning the implementation of the reform of the UK’s anti-money laundering and counterterrorist financing supervisory regime. The points everyone is raising about the implementation of this needing to be well done are extremely important, as...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc539-540
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for interrupting. The Minister has not answered the question of what assessment the Government have made of the cost impact on firms of moving from a single supervisor to dealing with two, particularly for small firms.

Member
Lord Russell of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c540
House
House of Lords

I am not aware of an individual calculation that has been done for that. I do not think that there will be a materially greater cost once the move is made. The key issue that we are trying to address here is that, right now, we have 23 regulators of...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc540-1
House
House of Lords

I withdraw the amendment.

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c541
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Pitt-Watson

31: Clause 16, page 18, line 38, at end insert—

“(ba) the competitiveness and growth objective (see section 1EB), and”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment would clarify that the strategic priorities set out by the FCA in a long-term strategy under new section 1JZA of the Financial Services and Markets Act...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c541
House
House of Lords

My Lords, growth is the top priority for the Government, and the financial services sector is key to delivering this. As my noble friend Lord Stockwood set out in Committee, the Government always intended that the FCA’s long-term strategy would set out its priorities for advancing its international competitiveness and...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc541-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is late, so I shall be relatively brief and not revisit the issues that we looked at in Committee. When I tabled these amendments, I still hoped that there would be some agreement reached on restoring the information hooks that Parliament has relied on until now for...

Member
Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc543-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is the first time I have spoken on Report, so I need to declare my interests as shown in the register, namely, that I hold shares in listed financial services companies, which may well be affected by the content of this Bill.

I start by thanking the Government...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc545-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my interest as an adviser to and shareholder in Banco Santander. Your Lordships will be pleased to know that I will speak very briefly on Amendment 68. My noble friend Lady Noakes just covered the waterfront incredibly well, in her exemplary manner, and made all the...

Member
Lord Bridges of Headley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc547-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by paying tribute to my noble friend Lady Noakes, to the Financial Services Regulation Committee, including the noble Baroness, Lady Bowles, and the noble Lord, Lord Vaux, and to my noble friend Lord Bridges of Headley for their persistent pursuit of a very simple but important...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc548-550
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not take up too much time because I responded to many of the points at the beginning of the debate. On the Independent Evaluation Office at the Bank of England, the Bank is committed to independent evaluation. It is strengthening the independence of the reviews that...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c550
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage first day. Amendment 17 disagreed to on division (26 to 119). Amendments 18, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 31 agreed to. (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Lord Pitt-Watson
Answering member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe; Lord Altrincham
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc518-550
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage third day. Clauses 37 to 61 agreed to. Bill reported with amendments (HL Bill 49).

Lead member
Baroness Ramsey of Wall Heath; Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Answering member
Viscount Camrose; Lord Markham
Department
Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade
Type
Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Notes
Northern Ireland, Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc163-200GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Clement-Jones

92C: Clause 37, page 62, line 24, leave out subsection (7)

Member’s explanatory statement

This probing amendment would remove the power for the Secretary of State to amend this Act by regulations so as to change the consultation and parliamentary scrutiny requirements applying to a code of practice. It responds...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c163GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that we are in the final furlong. In moving my Amendment 92C, I will also speak to the closely aligned Amendment 95C under my name. These amendments raise a profound and non-negotiable constitutional principle. They respond directly to the almost always authoritative recommendations of the Delegated...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc163-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for opening the final day of Committee. For a Bill of such importance, I am surprised at the speed of our progress. However, if quantity has been low, quality has more than compensated.

I agree with the noble Lord that this Committee...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc164-5GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his Amendments 92C and 95C, and note that these amendments were recommended by the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee in its report of 17 July. Some noble Lords may be aware that, until very recently, I was the chair of that committee. I...

Member
Baroness Ramsey of Wall Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc165-6GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her response, which was the reverse of the usual ministerial response—the sting was not in the tail but at the beginning. The end was much more conciliatory, given that she said the Government will consider taking on board the DPRRC’s recommendations before Report. I very...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c166GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Northover

99: After Clause 42, insert the following new Clause—

“Cyber security competence: functions of the UK Cyber Security Council

(1) The UK Cyber Security Council is to exercise the functions described in subsection (2) and is accountable to the Secretary of State for the exercise of those functions.

(2) The functions...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c167GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, all the amendments that I have put down to the Bill are derived from evidence we received on the National Resilience Select Committee. I am sorry that I was not here last week to address those that came up then, and I am very grateful to my noble...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc167-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was hoping that there would be other contributors—there will be a double-banking on this amendment.

I support Amendment 99, tabled by my noble friend. Throughout our deliberations on this Bill, the Government have placed enormous emphasis on imposing tough, outcomes-based statutory duties on operators and suppliers across our...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c169GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I intervene in support of the amendment in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Northover. I do not want the Liberal

Democrats to be on their own, so I hear the call from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones. It brings me back to the coalition days, when...

Member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc169-170GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I very much hope that the Government will accept the amendment in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Northover. It strikes me as a practical and important contribution to the Bill.

In addition to the points that have already been made by noble colleagues, there is one more...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c170GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Northover, for bringing forward Amendment 99. Throughout our consideration of the Bill, I have returned several times to the distinction between cyber compliance and cyber capability, and this amendment goes directly to that issue. We can impose ever more duties on businesses,...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c171GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness for her amendment, in particular her focus on the importance of the skills and competence of the UK cyber security professionals on whom we all rely and our economy will continue to rely. As the noble Lord, Lord Vaizey, said, an important aspect...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc171-3GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her thoughtful reply and I thank other noble Lords for their support here. Clearly, we are all seeking to move in the same direction. There is a challenge and risks here that are incredibly important. Whether this is the right way forward, we will have...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c173GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Northover

100: After Clause 42, insert the following new Clause—

“National cyber security support service for small and medium-sized enterprises

(1) The Secretary of State must, by regulations, make provision for the establishment and operation of a national cyber security support and incident response service for relevant small and medium-sized enterprises...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc173-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment again comes out of the evidence submitted to our National Resilience Select Committee.

It has been reported that many SMEs think that they are too small to be a target. However, as was reported at Second Reading, government research shows that 50% of UK SMEs faced some...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc174-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise early to support the amendment from the noble Baroness, Lady Northover, partly to spare the stress of the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, and also because there is a Liberal Democrat amendment imminent in the Chamber, although we of course will be abstaining—our solidarity with the Liberal...

Member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc175-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 100, in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Northover. I spoke in support of this type of amendment at Second Reading and I still support its intentions, but I will give it an added twist. The question in my mind is where this resource...

Member
Lord Londesborough (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc176-7GC
House
House of Lords

I think we all share the sympathy that the noble Baroness, Lady Northover, has identified SMEs need. There are 5.7 million SMEs in the UK and many of them—indeed, most of them—will purchase what are relatively complex platforms. The noble Lord, Lord Londesborough, is extremely experienced in the SME sector;...

Member
Lord Birt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c177GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too support Amendment 100, in the name of my noble friend Lady Northover, and will add my support to the very

useful speeches from the noble Lords, Lord Vaizey, Lord Birt and Lord Londesborough. I entirely agree with the noble Lord, Lord Vaizey, about the need to...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc177-9GC
House
House of Lords

To continue, if the state is going to impose heavy, legally binding supply chain security duties on small businesses, backed by turnover-based fines, the state has a moral and strategic obligation to provide the operational tools needed to meet those standards. By establishing a free, Australian-style digital safety net under...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c179GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Northover, for her amendment and, needless to say, I support the intention behind it. It is clearly right that, having placed several new duties on businesses and their vendors, the Government consider how to ensure that they are able to carry them...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc179-180GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness for her amendment and for linking the issue of cyber security with wider questions on national resilience; she is absolutely right to situate it in that space. I also thank her for introducing the topic of the right amount of cyber security support...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc180-1GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister, and I thank noble Lords for their support. This is clearly an area where we agree that there is a problem; we are very vulnerable in the United Kingdom. What we have in place is clearly not working sufficiently well if 60% of SMEs that are...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc181-2GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Clement-Jones

148A: After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause—

“Appeals against decisions under section 50

(1) A person may appeal to the Upper Tribunal against—

(a) a confirmation decision given to the person under section 50;

(b) a decision under section 50 to require the person to pay a penalty;

(c) the amount...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c183GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 148A stands in my name on the Marshalled List. This amendment would address a profound, structural and deeply disturbing gap in the judicial oversight and democratic accountability of the Bill. It represents a direct implementation of the authoritative recommendation of the Select Committee on the Constitution, in...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc183-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in addressing the amendment in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, I may increase his stress levels, unfortunately, as I oppose it. This means, I guess, that I am supporting the Government—that is, unless the Government are going to perform a volte-face in the face of...

Member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc184-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for introducing this important group and all noble Lords for their contributions. Beginning with Amendment 148A, it is reasonable to suggest that there should be a further right to appeal, given that we are talking about potentially large penalties of £17...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc186-7GC
House
House of Lords

I thank noble Lords for their amendments, starting with Amendment 148A, from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, which indeed

is in line with the recommendation from the Constitution Committee, which I thank for its report and its detailed scrutiny of this legislation.

As the noble Lord points out, Part 4 enables...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc187-8GC
House
House of Lords

I resume with Amendments 174A and 174B, which were introduced by the noble Lord, Lord Markham. They would require the Secretary of State to create a register of “foreign powers” that pose a threat to UK cyber security, to review this register and to lay the report in Parliament. This...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc188-9GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her response and the noble Lords, Lord Vaizey and Lord Markham, for their contributions. I cannot help feeling that the approach to this by the noble Lord, Lord Vaizey, is coloured by his history as a Minister. I can understand that because I saw the...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c189GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Clement-Jones

164: After Clause 58, insert the following new Clause—

“Computer Misuse Act 1990: statutory defence for cyber security activities

(1) The Secretary of State must, within 12 months of the day on which this Act is passed, carry out and publish a review of whether the introduction of a statutory...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c190GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 164 is in my name and, I am delighted to say, that of the noble Lord, Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom. Sadly, he is tied up next door with matters of national security—I hope that I am not giving away any secrets—and is unable to speak to this...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc190-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly support the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, whether technically or in spirit. He is right to point out how outdated the Computer Misuse Act is and that its blanket prohibition on undertaking cyber security activities without any public interest defence is ridiculous.

The noble Lord’s...

Member
Lord Vaizey of Didcot (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c193GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the campaign to reform the Computer Misuse Act is at least 10 years old, not just five. We—including me—have been working to try to get the provision that is contained in the amendment before us from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones. I endorse every single word that he...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc193-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak briefly in support of the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, which he so comprehensively set out. I did not mention this at Second Reading because I thought it was so self-evidently sensible that this needed to be fixed. I should know better, having...

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c194GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, one of the advantages of being in this Committee Room for these debates in Committee is that I can use Claude—I hope that is allowed—to answer the question of what the cyber security community thinks about the Computer Misuse Act. The answer comes back in bold. I will...

Member
Lord Tarassenko (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c194GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for introducing this amendment and the noble Lord, Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom, whom I see in his place. I am sorry he was unable to attend the beginning of this debate, but we are told it was for very good reasons....

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc194-5GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord for raising this topic through his amendment, and I recognise the strength of feeling on reforming the Computer Misuse Act. I agree that the UK should have the right legislative framework to allow us to tackle the threats posed by cyber criminals.

The Home...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc195-6GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that response. The noble Lord, Lord Vaizey, said that we know what the Minister will say: that it will be in a future piece of legislation. To that extent, we are pleased that at least we have a commitment to it, but this has been...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c196GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Markham

174E: After Clause 58, insert the following new Clause—

“Increasing resilience by reducing data retention

(1) The Secretary of State must, within one month of the day on which this Act is passed, open a consultation on the potential impact of minimising data collection and increasing data anonymisation on the...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc196-7GC
House
House of Lords

Amendment 174E in my name and those of my noble friends Lord Camrose and Lord Holmes builds on the point I made in the debate last Thursday that the best defence in cyber is, of course, not to present an attractive target in the first place.

I go back to my...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c197GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, despite the fact that this is the last group, it is a really important area and this amendment rightly reflects that. We strongly support Amendment 174E. It would introduce a fundamentally elegant and highly necessary cyber security principle that the Bill has otherwise completely ignored: that of data...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc197-9GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Markham, for raising this important issue again. Good data hygiene and security is essential to ensuring that public bodies are resilient to cyber attacks. Through the Bill, we are better protecting data, to make our essential services safer and more secure for all those...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc198-200GC
House
House of Lords

In the spirit of her final remarks on the Bill overall, is the Minister able to give any update as to when the national cyber action plan might emerge?

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c200GC
House
House of Lords

I have nothing further to add what I have said in previous sittings.

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c200GC
House
House of Lords

Nice try. I will get the final word then. First, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, for his strong support. Honey pot is a very descriptive and apt term for it. I thank the Minister for her comments and will definitely take up her offer of a meeting. I...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c200GC
House
House of Lords