Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,548 results for subject:Ministers

Subject X
Resignations

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Resignations (1,548)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

A briefing paper on the office and functions of the Prime Minister

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
CBP-9880

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will publish a copy of each resignation letter from Ministers and Parliamentary Private Secretaries who have resigned in the last month, and a copy of the Prime Minister’s reply in each case, that have not otherwise already been published on...

Asked by
Alex Burghart (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 May 2026
Reference
2045
House
House of Commons

I am not going to disclose private conversations. Further information came to light, and the Transport Secretary resigned. What a marked contrast. While the right hon. Lady is obsessing with Westminster issues, we are getting on with fixing the mess and fixing the foundations, with that £22 billion black hole, our prisons bursting and, as we found out last week, net migration of nearly 1 million because of the Tory open borders policy.

Answered by
Keir Starmer (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 2024
Reference
758 c291
House
House of Commons

He is obfuscating, but I am going to keep him on the topic. He owes the House an explanation. He says that the former Transport Secretary was asked to resign only after further information came to light. What was that further information?

Asked by
Kemi Badenoch (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
4 December 2024
Reference
758 c290
House
House of Commons

I am proud to say that my party is full of good ideas, but unfortunately we are unable to put them all into one motion. Let us have a little discipline today by concentrating on the motion at hand and the important issue we are raising. We believe that five...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 cc177-8
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. Friend agree that had any of our constituents been face to face with the Department for Work and Pensions in a similar situation to that which she describes, the results might have been different?

Member
Catherine West (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 c178
House
House of Commons

Any of our constituents struggling to get to the end of the week on their wage packet, and who see the amount of money being handed out—essentially as payment for failure—would be astonished that it was allowed. That is why we are trying to change the rules today.

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 c178
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Lady, in her meaningless and bitter speech, is missing the essential point that ought to be at the heart of her argument. When people are struggling, it is galling that someone who already earns a salary of £80,000 a year for being a Member of Parliament, and...

Member
Richard Fuller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 c178
House
House of Commons

If our motion does not go far enough for the hon. Gentleman, let me propose that he votes with us tonight anyway, because at least we are heading in the right direction. If his colleagues vote simply to keep the status quo, he will have a great deal of difficulty...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 cc179-180
House
House of Commons

It has been interesting to hear the Labour party—yes, the Labour party—make the case for the terms and conditions of workers to be changed unilaterally, in one day, and without consultation or a proper review. I am sure that Labour’s union paymasters will be fascinated to hear the case made...

Member
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 c180
House
House of Commons

Perhaps the third minute of her speech will be when the Minister starts to talk about the topic, which is ministerial severance pay. The “Minister for common sense” had personal experience of this in 2015, 2018 and 2020, and may soon do so again. In the meantime, can she tell...

Member
Bill Esterson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 c180
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member has raised a point about redundancy payments, and that is fundamentally what we are talking about. Severance pay is a redundancy payment, in that Ministers can be turfed out of office without any notice of termination and without any proper consultation. They have been given what would...

Member
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 c181
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Justin Madders (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 c181
House
House of Commons

I will carry on for a little while longer. I want to talk about what the Opposition are doing today, which is, as I said at the outset, seizing the business of the day and trying to make this a case for emergency legislation, which it is not. So many...

Member
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 c181
House
House of Commons

No, because we are going to win the vote today. Common sense will prevail, and we will know that this has to be sorted out now. There is no need to wait for a Labour Government; you guys can help us to pass this legislation.

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 c181
House
House of Commons

So it is not going to happen today, but in fact the Opposition are not going to do it if they come into power—which, hopefully, they will not. That is how much of an emergency it is.

However, there is some good news here. The right hon. Lady is putting herself...

Member
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 c181
House
House of Commons

Could we perhaps talk about the £10 billion wasted on personal protective equipment? I really think that the Minister ought to consider talking about ministerial severance reform, but that is, of course, a matter for her.

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 c181
House
House of Commons

So the right hon. Lady could not apologise. She could not, or did not want to, stop the waste of hundreds of billions of pounds.

I will say this: the Government accept that the current legislation is now a third of a century old, and that this may be an appropriate...

Member
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 cc181-2
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Andy Slaughter (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 c182
House
House of Commons

No, because we are talking about waste. We are talking about appropriate measures taking place and this faux emergency legislation that the right hon. Lady wants to bring in.

Turning to ministerial severance pay more generally, it is important to note that this is the long-standing policy that successive Governments from...

Member
Esther McVey (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2024
Reference
745 cc182-3
House
House of Commons