Skip to main content

1-20 of 157 results for subject:"Repossession orders"

Subject X
Refugees

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Refugees (157)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I propose simply to respond on Amendment 36, so if those on the opposition Front Bench wish to respond on Amendment 82ZA, I shall briefly pause. I see that they do not. First, I should have declared an interest as the president of Ambitious about Autism, the education...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c586
House
House of Lords

Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill. Lords committee stage fourth day. Schedule 1 under consideration.

Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c581-636, 652-702
House
House of Lords

That certainly must be a risk, and the need for the assistance of the Court of Protection is therefore enhanced. I am grateful to my noble friend for allowing that point to be emphasised. It is therefore essential that legal aid is available so that the court can be approached...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c628
House
House of Lords

I cannot blame the noble Lord for asking an-ex Legal Aid Minister that question. In immigration law over the last 20 years or so—this has been hinted at already in contributions, and no one really can gainsay it—it was spotted that there were those who practised immigration law who did...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c617-8
House
House of Lords

Before the noble and learned Baroness sits down, could she help me just a little? On Amendment 45, it does seem to me that relying upon a known, approved and accepted definition is clearly right. Of course I accept that, for all the very powerful reasons that have been given....

Member
Bishop of Chichester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c596
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the Minister’s flow, but this is a valuable opportunity to get to the bottom of this. From what he is saying, a reckless act on behalf of the state would be neither deliberate nor dishonest. If it was reckless, there would be no redress. Can...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c631
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Avebury, has made a very powerful case for the amendment that he has so ably moved. We support it from the opposition Front Bench, very much for the reason that he was arguing in the latter part of his speech: the complete mismatch between...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c671-2
House
House of Lords

72: Schedule 1, page 131, line 7, at end insert— ““( ) situations where a person’s financial difficulties could lead to loss of home.””

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c679
House
House of Lords

My Lords, may I first thank noble Lords for their substantial and much appreciated support for these two amendments? The Government are undoubtedly to be congratulated on their strategy. They are also to be congratulated on opting in to the directive. It is the directive to which the Minister has...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c660-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the purpose of Amendments 60 and 61 is to ask the Government to rectify an omission that denies legal aid to those who have been unlawfully deprived of their liberty by the state and their ability to obtain redress through the courts. The Government’s consultation resulted in legal...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c622
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendment 61ZA, which is in this group. It does not much relate to the amendments of the noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham, but it raises an interesting issue to explore at this stage. It would include the Duchy of Cornwall or the Crown Estate as...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c623-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak in favour of Amendment 60, for which the noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham, has made a strong case. I expect the Minister may say that, ipso facto, an abuse of power is unlawful. The problem is that if that is the argument, the way that sub-paragraph...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c624
House
House of Lords

I, too, would like to say a word in support of the amendments tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham. He has raised very important points. Surely, what he has argued for is self-evidently right in principle. As the noble Lord suggested, public authorities are almost by definition powerful in...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c624-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, commend this amendment for very serious attention. In the economic pressures under which we are operating and which are very much a factor in everything we are considering under this legislation, it seems to me that this provision is another example of a heavy penalty falling...

Member
Lord Judd (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c625
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my name is attached to Amendments 60 and 61 which were spoken to by my noble friend Lord Ramsbotham. Having listened to the contributions that have been made, it is clear that the whole area needs rewriting. The noble Lord, Lord Phillips, queried the various phrases that are...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c625-6
House
House of Lords

Before my noble friend Lord Carlile replies regarding his amendment, I thank the Minister for his reply to my amendments, which raised difficult technical points. I hope that he will forgive me if I read what he has said with some care, as no doubt he will read the whole...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c621
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in relation to Amendment 54, I am grateful for the explicit support from the noble Lord, Lord Bach, on the opposition Front Bench. So far as my noble and learned friend’s response is concerned, as he spoke, I reminded myself that when I was a young man and...

Member
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c621
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to my noble and learned friend. He has been extremely helpful. Can he clarify one point? Sometimes when judicial review claims are brought there is included in the claim a claim for damages, which can be awarded under judicial review. I take it from what he...

Member
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c618
House
House of Lords

This is quite important. As my noble friend will recognise, the overall structure of what is proposed to be in scope does not provide for legal aid for damages. However, I recognise what he says about damages being part of an overall judicial review claim. It is important that we...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c618-21
House
House of Lords

60: Schedule 1, page 127, line 33, after ““deliberate”” insert ““, unlawful””

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2012
Reference
734 c622
House
House of Lords