Skip to main content

1-20 of 301 results for subject:VAT

Subject X
Property transfer

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Amendment to clause 36, discussed with other amendments, schedule 14 and clause 37, debated and withdrawn. Clauses 36 and 37 agreed to. Amendments to schedule 14 negatived on division (7 votes to 10, in three cases). Schedule 14 agreed to. Clause 43, discussed with new clause 10 (Review of higher...

Lead member
Mel Stride; Robert Jenrick
Answering member
Clive Lewis; Anneliese Dodds
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Finance (No. 3) Bill Committee
Date
4 December 2018
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether VAT was charged on the purchase of Kingsland Fire Station from the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority.

Asked by
Meg Hillier (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 April 2016
Reference
33233
House
House of Commons

I. Finance Bill 2012. Explanatory note. Clause 189 Schedule 23: air passenger duty: amendment 4. 1 p. II. Finance Bill 2012. Explanatory note. Amendments to clause 195 and Schedule 26: categorisation of supplies and anti-forestalling charge to value added tax. 1 p. III. Finance Bill 2012. Explanatory note. New clause...

Deposited by
Treasury
Type
Deposited papers
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
DEP2012-1106
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend, but such things take time and I would not expect to see an immediate reaction. Over time, the implementation of the reform will help to instil confidence in the system. The failure of the present system is attributable to the fact that it is...

Member
Nick Raynsford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c652-3
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has much experience in this area, and she is right to say that it is all about improving the information available to the public. I personally believe that mandatory home condition reports would have done even more than the present package, but I hope that we will...

Member
Nick Raynsford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c654
House
House of Commons

I give way to the hon. Member for Windsor (Adam Afriyie).

Member
Lord Stunell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c649
House
House of Commons

Surely the hon. Gentleman acknowledges that there are some practical examples of the use of HIPs. Will he point to any occasion on which the horror stories that he identified were realised in places where HIPs have operated?

Member
Clive Betts (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c632
House
House of Commons

All in good time. The housing market has already been hit by a double whammy under the Government. A massive increase in stamp duty and steep rises in mortgage payments have made homes more unaffordable.

Member
Lord Gove (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c630
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Andrew Miller (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c631
House
House of Commons

If I am to make progress as Mr. Deputy Speaker has asked, I hope that the hon. Gentleman will accept that I cannot take any further interventions. I do not share the apocalyptic visions of meltdown in the housing market that some of the opponents of HIPs have forecast. They...

Member
Nick Raynsford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c654
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Gentleman looks back over time, he will find that the rate of addition to the housing stock has been at about 1 per cent. every year for a very long time. If we are serious about taking quick action to improve energy efficiency, we have to tackle...

Member
Nick Raynsford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c655
House
House of Commons

That is not correct.

Member
Lord Gove (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c655
House
House of Commons

On occasions, this debate has been fairly rumbustious, largely due to the excellence of the opening speech by my hon. Friend the Member for Surrey Heath (Michael Gove). However, in the few minutes remaining, I hope that I can take a slightly different approach to the matter. I think that...

Member
Tony Baldry (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c655-6
House
House of Commons

It makes tremendous sense for the provision of information to be the responsibility of the seller. We all know of cases where houses remain on the market for ages while prospective buyer after prospective buyer pays for the same information, discovering features that make the property undesirable or unrealistically priced....

Member
Nia Griffith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c656-7
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend makes a very good point. Does he agree with me that the fear of losing money in such a way creates inertia in first-time buyers and would not making this change stimulate the market for them?

Member
Andrew Miller (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c652
House
House of Commons

At the outset, I wish to draw attention to my declared interests, specifically as chairman of the Construction Industry Council and a director of Hometrack. As I have made clear in previous debates on this subject, I am a strong supporter, and have been for many years, of reform of...

Member
Nick Raynsford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c652
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is wrong. The seller puts the property on the market and commissions the EPC. If there are problems with the property, it may prompt the seller to carry out improvements, because he will know that they will give him a better chance of selling. That may help...

Member
Nick Raynsford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c653
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member for Surrey Heath (Michael Gove) said that the bureaucratic burden on local authorities of the increased number of searches for house sellers would result in the housing market drying up. Given the fact that buyers currently have to get a search on houses they wish to buy...

Member
Adrian Bailey (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c653
House
House of Commons

Is not the downside of that the real risk that requiring an EPC—which is a good idea, and that has always been the view of Conservative Members—up front adds to the seller’s risk of abortive costs? Those costs are likely to be passed on to the buyer, so it is...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c653
House
House of Commons

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Geoffrey Clifton-Brown (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c654
House
House of Commons