Skip to main content

1-20 of 156 results for subject:Diabetes

Subject X
Primary care trusts

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Primary care trusts (156)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Department of Health
Type
Deposited papers
Date
8 May 2014
Reference
DEP2014-0719
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health which primary care trusts have had funding withdrawn, wholly or partially, for (a) integrated diabetes networks and (b) specialist diabetes carers; and how much funding was withdrawn in each case.

[112597]

Asked by
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Answering body
Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 June 2012
Reference
112597; 546 c1030W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much Leicestershire Primary Care Trust spent on renal failure in diabetics in (a) 2002, (b) 2010, (c) 2011 and (d) 2012 to date.

[112598]

Asked by
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Answering body
Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 June 2012
Reference
112598; 546 c1030W
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Department of Health
Type
Deposited papers
Date
30 May 2012
Reference
DEP2012-0865
House
House of Lords
Deposited by
Department of Health
Type
Deposited papers
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
DEP2012-0832
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Department of Health
Type
Deposited papers
Date
6 February 2012
Reference
DEP2012-0237
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I thank the Minister most sincerely. Apart from anything else, he has explained the BMA agreement far better than I did in my attempted few sentences. I hope that that has provided some reassurance to the House. I am grateful to him for explaining the problem with the...

Member
Baroness Finlay of Llandaff (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2011
Reference
731 c1272
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for providing me with the strong assurance that to him and his colleagues the strengthening of the parent/child relationship is absolutely crucial in what they are doing. There is strong agreement with that point and I thank him for that. I will look forward to reading...

Member
Earl of Listowel (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2011
Reference
731 c1254
House
House of Lords

Will the noble Lord explain what he actually wants, because I am now thoroughly confused? First, he seeks the reincarnation of a section of the 2006 Act, which, if I remember rightly, was a consolidation Act—in other words, merely a record of what had already happened in history. He then...

Member
Lord Newton of Braintree (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2011
Reference
731 c1250
House
House of Lords

But I did subscribe to it. There is a sort of collective responsibility on these Benches, too. This is a probing amendment—it could hardly be anything else in the circumstances—that tries to deal with what actually constitutes the health service. Of course, this phrase runs through the Bill but there...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2011
Reference
731 c1249-50
House
House of Lords

7: Clause 1, page 2, line 7, at end insert— ““( ) For the purposes of this Act ““the health service in England”” is defined as those services provided under section 3 of this Act.””

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2011
Reference
731 c1249
House
House of Lords

I am happy to withdraw my amendment given the statement made by the Minister. I also join the many people in this House who have said how much we appreciate his almost unending patience with us and his willingness to listen and engage in extremely informed and very intelligent debate....

Member
Baroness Williams of Crosby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2011
Reference
731 c1249
House
House of Lords

I appreciate that the noble Earl is moving to a position of not addressing those questions, but it is important that he tells the Committee whether the Government have a fixed mind on these matters or whether they are going to approach with an open mind the discussions that we,...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2011
Reference
731 c1248
House
House of Lords

I shall, of course, be guided by the Committee. If it is the wish of the Committee that I do not explain the Government’s view, then I will not do so. With apologies to those noble Lords whose questions I am not going to answer now—

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2011
Reference
731 c1248
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to my noble friend. I apologise to the Committee. I had thought that it would be helpful if I commented on each amendment for the sake of the record so that, going forward, the Government’s view of each amendment would be clear.

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2011
Reference
731 c1248
House
House of Lords

The reason I did not make my 12-minute speech was that we are now going to go into a period of consideration. I respectfully say to the Minister that we could start the whole debate all over again if he continues telling us what the Government do or do not...

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2011
Reference
731 c1248
House
House of Lords

These amendments have presented your Lordships’ House with a very difficult task. I join others in paying tribute to my noble friend the Minister, my noble and learned friend Lord Mackay, and to the noble Baronesses, Lady Thornton, Lady Williams and Lady Jay, for the wisdom they have shown in...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2011
Reference
731 c1245-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hesitate to intervene on the noble Earl, who knows I hold him in the highest possible esteem, but I think he is now treading on some contentious legal issues. Bearing in mind the wonderful consensus that we have now reached, I would just ask him to consider...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2011
Reference
731 c1247
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been an excellent debate. It has proved one thing in my mind: an issue of this importance for the Bill—the overarching duty of the Secretary of State for the NHS—has benefited enormously from having a Committee of the Whole House to consider it. Without unnecessarily detaining...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2011
Reference
731 c1246-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I discovered at the end of last week that it is possible to table an amendment as part of a group if the debate on that group has been adjourned and the first item in the group has not been put to the House. I did not know...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2011
Reference
731 c1244
House
House of Lords