Skip to main content

1-16 of 16 results for subject:Self-assessment

Subject X
Overpayments

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Overpayments (16)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
6 July 2026
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, on how many occasions a repayment of overpaid tax to a customer who has submitted a voluntary self-assessment return been delayed by longer than (a) three, (b) six and (c) 12 months in the latest period for which data is available.

Asked by
Daisy Cooper (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 October 2025
Reference
82719
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
17 July 2013
Reference
CHAP 29 2013; 2013 c. 29

Clauses 219 to 232 agreed to, with clause 219, discussed with new clause 6 (Transfer pricing arrangements), agreed to as amended. Schedules 46 to 49 agreed to. New clause 4 (Contribution allowances: Plant and machinery), debated and agreed to. New clause 1 (Abolition of retrospective application of section 58(4) of...

Lead member
David Gauke; Sajid Javid
Answering member
Catherine McKinnell; Chris Leslie
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Finance (No. 2) Bill Committee
Date
20 June 2013
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I start by thanking the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, for the opportunity to discuss these regulations. As other speakers have said, he has joined the exclusive band of those involved in Motions of Regret, one that I myself have joined, although I have been on the receiving end...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
719 c1244-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend for tabling the Motion and for giving me the opportunity to explain how this voluntary debt recovery trial will be evaluated. I take the point about the numbers in the House for this debate—this is an exclusive group—but I can claim to be...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
719 c1246-50
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have very little to add to what has been said by my noble friend Lord Lucas. The Merits Committee reported to the House on this matter in April and again following a meeting last week. He has deployed all the considerations that we had in mind with...

Member
Lord Goodlad (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
719 c1241
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am pleased to be able to follow colleagues in this technical but important debate. I start by congratulating the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, on joining the Motion-to-regret club. The bad news for him is that the chairman is my noble friend Lady Thomas, I am the secretary,...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
719 c1241-4
House
House of Lords

I will not rise to that. My noble friend Lord Kirkwood asked when the trial was due to start. It will start next month, and the first letters will go out then. We do not intend to cancel this trial; we will go ahead with it, although we will extend...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
719 c1250
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am extremely grateful to my noble friend for that comprehensive and helpful reply. I shall not trade blows with him on matters to do with welfare, as I am merely an extremely junior acolyte at his feet. This has been a fascinating debate for me and I...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
719 c1250-1
House
House of Lords

Moved By To move to resolve that this House regrets that the Social Security (Claims and Payments) Amendment (No. 2) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/870) have been based on an inadequate design which will be unable to produce reliable evidence. Relevant documents: 17th Report, Session 2009–10, from the Merits Committee.

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
719 c1237
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by thanking my noble friend Lord Freud for turning up to respond to this Motion. The instrument that I am praying against is not of his genesis and if I get hot under the collar I hope he will accept that I am not aiming at...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
719 c1237-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, very much for the comprehensive way in which he introduced his Motion and welcome him to this most exclusive of gatherings in London; the tiny number of us in this House who speak on DWP orders and the even tinier number...

Member
Baroness Thomas of Winchester (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
719 c1239-41
House
House of Lords

Social Security (Claims and Payments) Amendment (No. 2) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/870). Lords debate on a motion that the House regrets the Regulations have been based on inadequate design which will be unable to produce reliable evidence. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Lucas
Answering member
Lord Freud
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
719 c1237-51
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Notes
See also NAO report HC 674 2007-08
Date
2 March 2009
Reference
HC 311 2008-09
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
8 October 2008
Reference
HC 1085-i 2007-08
House
House of Commons