Skip to main content

1-20 of 842 results for subject:Tenants

Subject X
Ombudsman

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Ombudsman (842)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee
Date
30 June 2026
Reference
HC 42 2026-27
House
House of Commons

This briefing provides an overview of amendments made to the Renters' Rights Bill 2024-25 in the House of Lords.

Type
Briefing papers on bills
Date
2 September 2025
Reference
CBP-10325

Lords report stage third day. Amendment 87 agreed to on division (237 to 223). Amendment 88 agreed to. Amendment 98 disagreed to on division (215 to 240). Amendment 106 agreed to on division (282 to 158). Amendment 110 disagreed to on division (98 to 148). Amendment 111 agreed to on...

Lead member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage
Answering member
Lord Keen of Elie; Baroness Scott of Bybrook; Lord Jamieson
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Scottish and Welsh legislative consent granted.
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1722-1800
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Keen of Elie

87: Clause 41, page 58, line 4, leave out “on the balance of probabilities” and insert “beyond reasonable doubt”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment, in conjunction with another amendment in the name of Lord Keen of Elie to clause 58, imposes a uniform standard of proof – beyond...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c1723
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by referring to my interests as recorded in the register. I add that I am the proprietor of properties in London that are the subject of tenancy agreements and are managed by an agent.

In this group we have Amendments 87 and 88 in similar terms. Amendment...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1723-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 104 in my name in this group and, in doing so, I declare my interest as a trustee of the Nationwide Foundation. First, I thank my noble friend Lady Taylor of Stevenage for the excellent meeting we had, together with the noble Lord,...

Member
Baroness Kennedy of Cradley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1724-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a great pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Kennedy. I have also enjoyed my encounters with the Minister, with her, to discuss these issues. I rise to speak to Amendment 110 in my name. I am very grateful for the support of the noble Lords,...

Member
Lord Cromwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1726-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendments 87, 88 and 103, which I have signed. I add my thanks to the Minister, who has engaged with me on these amendments, among others in the Bill. She has always been courteous and has had good points of view.

These amendments were originally...

Member
Earl of Kinnoull (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1727-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Cromwell, to which I added my name. Sadly, he is right: the police do not have sufficient knowledge about the law changes, which are now quite old. I suspect the reason is that the complaints tend to be infrequent,...

Member
Lord Hogan-Howe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1728-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will briefly support Amendment 110 in the names of the noble Lords, Lord Cromwell and Lord Hogan-Howe. I am grateful to Safer Renting, ACORN and the Renters’ Reform Coalition for bringing this matter to our attention. My noble friends have noted that this is a milder and...

Member
Lord Best (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c1729
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendments 87, 88 and 104, as we have heard, seek to raise the burden of proof to that of the criminal standard, “beyond

reasonable doubt”, from the civil standard, “on the balance of probabilities”, consistently across the Bill. All the amendments in the next group, on financial penalties,...

Member
Baroness Thornhill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1729-1731
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble and learned Lord, Lord Keen of Elie, the noble Lord, Lord Cromwell, and my noble friend Lady Kennedy of Cradley for their amendments. I thank the noble Earl, Lord Kinnoull, for his comments. We all miss the late Lord Etherton very much and I...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1731-4
House
House of Lords

I am obliged to noble Lords for their contributions to this debate. I make a number of observations. First, I sympathise with the observations made by the noble Baroness, Lady Kennedy, about the conduct of those she identifies as criminal landlords. But before someone should be stigmatised and identified as...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c1735
House
House of Lords

Given that we are not talking about criminal offences—we are talking about civil offences—and given the power imbalance between a landlord and a tenant, will the noble and learned Lord at least accept that by lowering the burden of proof we would allow the tenant to feel that they might...

Member
Baroness Thornhill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c1735
House
House of Lords

I do not accept the proposition advanced by the noble Baroness at all. In circumstances where you are going to stigmatise somebody’s conduct as criminal, as the noble Baroness, Lady Kennedy, pointed out, it is appropriate that there should be a relevant standard of proof. You are not taking away...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1735-6
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Keen of Elie

88: Clause 58, page 90, line 33, leave out “on the balance of probabilities” and insert “beyond reasonable doubt”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment, in conjunction with another amendment in the name of Lord Keen of Elie name to clause 41, imposes a uniform standard of proof –...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c1736
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Keen of Elie

89: Clause 59, page 92, line 18, leave out “£40,000” and insert “£7,000”

Member’s explanatory statement

This limits the local housing authority’s power to impose a financial penalty to £7,000.

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c1736
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 89 is to Clause 59 and addresses the question of the penalty proposed in that provision, which is £40,000. Under the amendment, that would revert to the same level of penalty for other provisions in the Bill of £7,000, on the basis that £40,000 is simply excessive.

If...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c1736
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this group of amendments on the financial penalties raises the very important point of how local authorities are informed of the landlord’s breaches and hence are in a position to impose financial penalties. Without that, there can be no imposition of financial penalties. This issue was raised in...

Member
Lord Hacking (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 cc1740-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, fines must be proportionate, yet, as the Bill stands, the threshold for imposing fines on landlords is worryingly low, and the scale of those fines is notably high. This combination is troubling. Setting fines at such significant levels, in some cases representing a substantial portion of a landlord’s...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c1741
House
House of Lords