Skip to main content

1-50 of 1,095 results for subject:Roads

Subject X
Noise

Type

-
Early day motions (1)
+ Legislation (11) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (3)
-
Hybrid bills (2)
+ Public bills (1) + Private members' bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (6)
-
Statutory instruments (6)
+ Members' contributions (733)
-
Oral answers to questions (20)
+ Oral questions (22)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (691)
+ Parliamentary committees (11) + Committee proceedings (6)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (3)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
-
Select Committee reports (4)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
+ Parliamentary papers (41)
-
Command papers (4)
-
Consultation papers (1)
-
Deposited papers (29)
-
House of Commons papers (6)
-
House of Lords papers (1)
-
Impact assessments (1)
+ Unprinted papers (1)
-
National Policy Statements (final proposal) (1)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (46) + Debates (32)
-
Adjournment debates (12)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (6)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (3)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (3)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
+ Legislative debates (9)
-
Debates on bills (9)
-
Opposition days (1)
-
Questions for short debate (2)
+ Petitions and observations (6)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (4)
+ Statements (8) + Oral statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (1)
-
Written statements (7)
+ Parliamentary questions (286) + Oral questions (22)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Written questions (264)
+ Petitions and observations (6)
-
Observations on petitions (2)
-
Paper petitions (4)
+ Research briefings (2)
-
Commons Briefing papers (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Noise (1,095)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Member
Melanie Onn (Labour)
Type
Ten minute rule bills
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
Bill 426 2024-26
House
House of Commons

Ten minute rule motion for leave to bring in a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading (Bill 426). To be read a second time on 1 May.

Lead member
Melanie Onn
Type
Debates on bills
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 cc184-6
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That leave be given to bring in a Bill to prohibit the use of road surfacing materials which generate in-vehicle noise levels above a specified maximum; to require the resurfacing of existing roads which generate in-vehicle noise above that maximum; and for connected purposes.

In Great Grimsby and...

Member
Melanie Onn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 cc184-5
House
House of Commons

I appreciate that—thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. Maybe we all need ear defenders in this place once in a while.

We have clear rules and protections for prolonged noise exposure in many workplaces because we understand that repeated exposure can damage hearing and affect health, yet when it comes to people...

Member
Melanie Onn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 April 2026
Reference
784 cc185-6
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her department has assessed the impact of noise levels from National Highway project’s on community groups.

Asked by
Will Forster (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 March 2026
Reference
122382
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department plans to roll out noise detection cameras on roads.

Asked by
Dan Aldridge (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 September 2025
Reference
74554
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department plans to introduce noise cameras.

Asked by
Freddie van Mierlo (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2025
Reference
68246
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 4 July 2025 to Question 64334 on Roads: Noise, whether she has made an assessment of the potential merits of the installation of noise cameras, following the 2022 trial.

Asked by
Freddie van Mierlo (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
66815
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what estimate her Department has made of the levels of noise pollution on roads (a) in Oxfordshire and (b) nationally.

Asked by
Freddie van Mierlo (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 July 2025
Reference
64334
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 8 May to Question HL6929 on Roads: Cameras, if she will issue guidance to (a) police and (b) local authorities on how roadside noise cameras may be used to tackle noise-related anti-social behaviour.

Asked by
Damian Hinds (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 June 2025
Reference
57223
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will make an assessment of the potential merits of installing noise cameras to tackle excessively noisy vehicles on rural roads in Bedfordshire.

Asked by
Blake Stephenson (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 March 2025
Reference
35020
House
House of Commons

My Right Honourable friend, the Secretary of State for Transport (Mr Mark Harper), has made the following Ministerial Statement.

In October 2023, this Government announced The Plan for Drivers, setting out 30 measures that improve the experience of driving through smoother journeys; stopping unfair enforcement; easier parking; cracking down on inconsiderate...

Member
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative)
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Written statements
Date
18 March 2024
Reference
HLWS346
House
House of Lords

In October 2023, this Government announced The Plan for Drivers, setting out 30 measures that improve the experience of driving through smoother journeys; stopping unfair enforcement; easier parking; cracking down on inconsiderate driving; and helping the transition to zero emission driving. We continue to implement these measures, taking action to...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Written statements
Date
18 March 2024
Reference
HCWS350
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I was very excited when I saw this grouping: I thought that I had got my own group to myself. However, I am afraid that others have butted in. I am very grateful for that, obviously.

The noble and learned Lord accused me of trying to waste a lot...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2022
Reference
826 c613
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if he will make an assessment of the level of road noise (a) in the London Borough of Havering and (b) around the Romford Ring Road.

Asked by
Andrew Rosindell (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 2022
Reference
65650
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of establishing a regulated authority to tackle the use of (a) loud engines and (b) exhausts on public highways.

Asked by
Matthew Offord (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 May 2022
Reference
708
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Janet Daby (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c762
House
House of Commons

And finally!

Member
Kit Malthouse (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c762
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for giving way on that point. Shelter states that over 30,000 women since the beginning of the pandemic have been pestered by landlords to exchange sex for a roof over their heads. Does the Minister not think that there is more the Government should be doing...

Member
Janet Daby (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c762
House
House of Commons

As I say, there are already offences being committed in those circumstances, and we have had successful prosecutions in exactly the circumstances the hon. Member outlines. Anybody who has been subjected to that kind of criminality should, I hope, feel in a position to report it. However, we need to...

Member
Kit Malthouse (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c762
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c762
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for his speech. He comes late to this party—he was not part of the Committee stage—and he has done well to catch up at this point.

We believe parts 3 and 4 of the Bill represent a power grab that bans peaceful protests and compounds inequalities, which...

Member
Sarah Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c763
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for making such a fantastic speech. Does she agree with me that there needs to be a specific offence to punish landlords who engage in this awful practice of exploitation through sex for rent?

Member
Janet Daby (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c763
House
House of Commons

I absolutely do agree with my hon. Friend, and that is what we are trying to achieve tonight. This is not overly complicated, and I think it is staggering, when the Government are introducing legislation far faster in other cases, that they will not support the Lords amendment—and women—in this...

Member
Sarah Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 cc763-4
House
House of Commons

Would the hon. Lady agree with me that introducing this will require an extra burden of proof to be established through the court process, which as a result may actually make things worse for those reporting a crime?

Member
Craig Whittaker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c764
House
House of Commons

I understand what the hon. Member is saying, but as my hon. Friend the Member for Walthamstow (Stella Creasy) said, there is a carve-out clause particularly designed to satisfy that concern. I believe that distinguishing between serious sexual violence crimes and other forms of crime that may be enacted with...

Member
Sarah Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c764
House
House of Commons

I share the hon. Lady’s horror of misogyny, but I do not understand why although “sex” is defined in the amendment, “gender” is not. What does she understand by the term “gender” in the amendment? Why is it not defined?

Member
Joanna Cherry (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c764
House
House of Commons

I understand the point that the hon. and learned Lady is making. The offences are motivated by hostility towards the sex or gender of the victim, and the amendment is designed to be as inclusive as possible, but I hear what she says. Refuge and some other women’s organisations have...

Member
Sarah Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c764
House
House of Commons

But surely as legislators, if we use a word we have to define it. We all know that there have been problems with conflating sex and gender. The amendment clearly states “sex or gender” and since “sex” is defined, as one would expect, by reference to section 11 of the...

Member
Joanna Cherry (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c764
House
House of Commons

The aim of the amendment is to try to make misogyny a hate crime in whatever form it comes, and to be as inclusive as possible in that definition.

Member
Sarah Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c764
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that given that “gender” is defined in legislation—indeed, the Government rather helpfully defined it in their consultation document, so we have a definition of “gender”—it is

therefore important that we focus on perpetrators? The point behind hate crime is that I could be a victim...

Member
Stella Creasy (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c764
House
House of Commons

rose —

Member
Joanna Cherry (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c765
House
House of Commons

I feel as if there should be a three-way conversation in another place to tackle some of these questions. But they are real questions, and my hon. Friend the Member for Walthamstow has campaigned on this issue for a very long time, and it is important that we listen to...

Member
Sarah Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c765
House
House of Commons

Perhaps I can help out and say that, although no legislation is a silver bullet, this measure would make powerful progress and take a powerful stance against certain attitudes that are so prevalent and stare us in the face. We should send a signal that such attitudes are unacceptable, in...

Member
Wera Hobhouse (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c765
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady puts it very well, and I completely agree. We have seen with the recording of such crimes in Nottinghamshire and other places that this measure works. It is welcomed by the police, as it is a useful thing for them as well.

Member
Sarah Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c765
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady talks about the importance of symbolism, and I agree with her. Is she concerned that if we were to accept an amendment that exempts domestic abuse and sexual offences from the aggravating element of misogyny, that would be a terrible message to send? They are some of...

Member
Ruth Edwards (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c765
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for that intervention, but as my hon. Friend the Member for Walthamstow said, there is precedent for this with the case of the murderers of Stephen Lawrence.

Member
Sarah Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c765
House
House of Commons

Just to correct the record, surely the issue was that there was no hate crime legislation to prosecute that murder. It was not that it was specifically carved out.

Member
Ruth Edwards (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c765
House
House of Commons

By the time that prosecution happened such legislation was in place, and there is precedent for that. I could point the hon. Lady in the direction of a very good briefing that explains all that in much greater detail, and I would be happy to send that to her.

Tonight we...

Member
Sarah Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 cc765-7
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c767
House
House of Commons

As a woman who is perennially in a hurry and terribly impatient, I will ensure that my contribution is blissfully short. There is much in the Bill that I feel encouraged about. As hon. Members might expect, as Chair of the Women and Equalities Committee, I will focus specifically on...

Member
Caroline Nokes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 cc767-8
House
House of Commons

Girls from Stroud High School got me into their school to talk about the public sexual harassment that they receive—often daily and often in their school uniforms—which is outrageous. Under the “Everyone’s Invited” campaign, many schoolgirls—and schoolboys as well—have reported exactly what they experience. Does my right hon. Friend agree...

Member
Siobhan Baillie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c768
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. It is in our schools that those calls are strongest, which means that young women in their school uniforms are being significantly impacted. They feel scared to walk home alone. They are given advice to stay to well-lit areas, to ensure that they walk...

Member
Caroline Nokes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c768
House
House of Commons

I completely agree with everything that the right hon. Member said. It is frustrating as always that, yet again, we are asking women to think about how they keep themselves safe rather than thinking how we stop the perpetrators, let alone the focus being somehow on street lighting, as if...

Member
Stella Creasy (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c768
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady makes an important and powerful point. It is imperative that we look at this issue not just in terms of sexual harassment. I apologise for detaining hon. Members a moment longer than I intended, but I want to highlight the case of a constituent who came to...

Member
Caroline Nokes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 cc768-9
House
House of Commons

On a small point of clarification, my right hon. Friend quite rightly referred to how the vast majority of spiking cases are about men spiking women’s drinks, and there is no question about that, but I am sure she recognises that some cases—I think in particular of the heinous case...

Member
Richard Graham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c769
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that comment. I hope that I did not in any way give the impression that men are not victims, because, yes, they are. When we talk about violence perpetrated against others, sometimes we do not adequately identify the many instances in which young men,...

Member
Caroline Nokes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c769
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 c769
House
House of Commons

I will keep my comments to Lords amendments concerning the extraction of information from electronic devices.

To be clear, it is not that the Scottish National party does not have views about everything else, and it is certainly not that we do not care; it is because provisions on those...

Member
Anne McLaughlin (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 cc769-770
House
House of Commons

I think, listening objectively to today’s debate, there is an enormous level of agreement on both sides of the House that there is a job of work to be done to protect women against abuse, and that there are different options for how we might achieve that. That is the...

Member
Maria Miller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2022
Reference
709 cc770-2
House
House of Commons