Skip to main content

1-20 of 221 results for subject:Software

Subject X
National security

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
National security (221)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords committee stage first day. Clauses 1 to 5 agreed to. Clause 6, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 7 to 14 agreed to.

Lead member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra
Answering member
Viscount Camrose; Lord Markham
Department
Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade
Type
Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Notes
Northern Ireland, Scottish and Welsh legislative consent sought.
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 cc1-59GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Lloyd of Effra

1: Clause 2, page 2, line 13, leave out “on the Secretary of State”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment is consequential on my new Clause (Functions under this Part).

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 c1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will also speak to the other amendments in my name in this group. I thank noble Lords for their constructive engagement on this topic over the Summer Recess. I particularly thank the noble Viscount, Lord Camrose, and his colleagues for sending their questions in advance. I will...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 cc1-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I assume that there are no Back-Bench contributions at this point, so I will speak on behalf of the Liberal Democrats to this very significant group of amendments tabled by

the Minister as recently as 24 August. I thank her for her introduction today and for her brief...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 cc2-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for not speaking before the Liberal Front Bench, but the great news for everybody in Grand Committee is that I am not the Conservative Front Bench. That is good to know. I declare my relevant technology interests as adviser to the Crown Estate and to Simmons...

Member
Lord Holmes of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 cc4-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that this is profoundly unsatisfactory. It is not good parliamentary procedure to table so many amendments radically different from anything that we have seen before, which I, for one, have seen only at the last minute, so to speak—I have read them, but I will not...

Member
Lord Birt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 c5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if I may, I will reiterate points that the noble Lord, Lord Birt, has made. A number of us are struggling to keep up. Much of what the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, said made a lot of sense, but I certainly do not feel sufficiently sighted on the...

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 c5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness the Minister for introducing this debate and for her helpful advance briefings on these

amendments. I also welcome all noble Lords back for what, I am sure, will be a productive Committee stage. It is worth noting at the start of Committee that,...

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 cc5-7GC
House
House of Lords

I thank noble Lords for their comments, views and questions, and I will endeavour to respond to them.

In respect of why the power is being granted to the Secretary of State or the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, it is to anticipate any unforeseen machinery of government changes. It...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 cc7-8GC
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, I note that there are a lot of “just in case” elements of the Bill; to me, it feels that there are rather too many. For example, I refer the Minister back to the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster v the Secretary of State....

Member
Viscount Camrose (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 c8GC
House
House of Lords

I am very happy to look at the points that noble Lords have raised in the course of this discussion. I believe that elements such as the consultation and the process of scrutiny are well thought out. I believe that in terms of the elements of subsequent parliamentary scrutiny—the reports...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 c8GC
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister explain why GCHQ is not the right home to exercise these powers? I am sure we will all agree that national security is a significant issue, but it is being lodged in departments that have no prior experience of it. What is wrong with existing GCHQ procedures,...

Member
Lord Birt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 c9GC
House
House of Lords

I will need to write to the noble Lord on that specific question of how GCHQ’s powers are executed in respect of operational decisions such as this. I am aware that in other areas they are within Secretary of State responsibility, whether they are exercised by a Secretary of State,...

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 c9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her gracious, intended withdrawal of Amendment 1, and I am sure we will have a much better debate on Report as a result, particularly once we have had a chance to read her remarks on both interventions today. However, I hope she will...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 c9GC
House
House of Lords

With that, I believe now is the time where I beg to leave to withdraw Amendment 1.

Member
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 c9GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Kidron

3: Clause 4, page 3, line 18, at end insert—

“(3A) A data centre also meets the threshold requirement in this paragraph, regardless of its rated IT load, if the Office of Communications considers that an incident affecting the data centre would be likely to have a significant impact...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 c9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very sorry that I missed the early part of that debate because I feel it might impact on some of the things I say. However, when I read the government amendments, I could not see anything in them that made the amendments unnecessary, so I will...

Member
Baroness Kidron (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 cc10-1GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendments 3, 8 and 13 in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron, to which I have added my name. I will not repeat too much all her comments on our learning from the Online Safety Act that small does not mean low risk. However,...

Member
Baroness Harding of Winscombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 cc11-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these amendments confront us immediately with some of the Bill’s most fundamental potential structural weaknesses—the danger of a static, arbitrary and pre-digital scope. The Government appear to have conceded this point already by tabling those infamous 65 high-risk vendor amendments in the previous group. Let us look first...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 cc12-3GC
House
House of Lords

I add my thanks to the noble Baroness, Lady Kidron, and other noble Lords for trying to make sense of what we all agree is a very difficult area. We are trying to come to a definition of high-risk areas. As we have heard in the examples today, you cannot...

Member
Lord Markham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 September 2026
Reference
859 c13GC
House
House of Lords