Skip to main content

1-20 of 3,645 results for subject:Evidence

Subject X
National security

Type

+ Legislation (5) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (2) + Public bills (2)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Delegated legislation (1)
-
Statutory instruments (1)
+ Members' contributions (3,540)
-
Oral answers to questions (2)
-
Oral question time interventions (2)
-
Oral questions (2)
-
Points of order (4)
-
Proceeding contributions (3,534)
+ Parliamentary committees (37) + Committee proceedings (27)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (9)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (10)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Select Committee reports (4)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (3)
-
Select Committee written evidence (4)
+ Parliamentary papers (23)
-
Command papers (6)
-
Consultation papers (2)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (1)
-
Deposited papers (7)
-
House of Commons papers (9)
-
House of Lords papers (4)
-
Impact assessments (3)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (76) + Debates (59)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (27)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (9)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (10)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
+ Legislative debates (56)
-
Debates on bills (54)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (2)
+ Statements (14) + Oral statements (10)
-
Ministerial statements (9)
-
Speaker's statements (1)
-
Written statements (4)
-
Urgent questions (2)
+ Parliamentary questions (5)
-
Oral questions (2)
-
Urgent questions (2)
-
Written questions (1)
+ Research briefings (1)
-
Commons Briefing papers (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
National security (3,645)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
9 February 2026
Reference
HC 1700 2024-26; HL 262 2024-26
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Lords statement on the role of the Attorney General's Office in the decision to drop the China spy prosecution.

Lead member
Lord Hermer
Department
Attorney General
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1057-1061
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Attorney-General has a duty to superintend the prosecution agencies and to be consulted about sensitive and high-profile cases. The practice for cases that are likely to be dropped, but of which the Attorney-General was initially informed, is that the Attorney-General is advised in advance of the risk...

Member
Lord Keen of Elie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 c1057
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble and learned Lord for his question. May I just correct a few facts? I was not informed by the DPP on 1 September; I was informed on 3 September. Secondly, and this is an important constitutional point, in our constitutional framework politicians play no role whatever...

Member
Lord Hermer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 c1057
House
House of Lords

My Lords, some 50 years ago last month, I was junior in a trial that took place at Mold Crown Court, prosecuted by the then Attorney-General, Sam Silkin—they earned their spurs in those days by prosecuting in court. An ex-RAF pilot from Valley had knocked on the front door of...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 c1059
House
House of Lords

Consent was given by a law officer under the previous Government to this prosecution. I hope the noble Lord will forgive me if I do not go into the evidential details in this case. The decision was made by the independent CPS. In this case, the Director of Public Prosecutions...

Member
Lord Hermer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 c1059
House
House of Lords

The noble and learned Lord will know that the Court of Appeal recently stated that an “enemy” includes a country which poses a threat to the national security of this country. Is it the Government’s view that the People’s Republic of China does pose a threat to the national security...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 c1059
House
House of Lords

I will deal first with the Roussev case and the difficulties the Crime Prosecution Service faced in bringing this prosecution. The noble Lord is quite right that in Roussev, which was a rare case for the courts to look at—the meaning of “enemy” under

the 1911 Act—it was said that...

Member
Lord Hermer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1059-1060
House
House of Lords

My Lords, following on from that answer, the Prime Minister has said repeatedly that the prosecution required evidence that the information was linked to an enemy, based on the policy of the previous Government. The Director of Public Prosecutions on Friday said the test was not what the previous Government...

Member
Lord Howard of Lympne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 c1060
House
House of Lords

There can be no doubt that for the purposes of an offence said to have been committed between 2021 and 2023, where the test is whether that was provision to an enemy, the question is, were they deemed an enemy during that relevant period, between 2021 and 2023? I do...

Member
Lord Hermer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 c1060
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there seems to be a lot of confusion about this at the moment. I respectfully direct attention to what the Director of Public Prosecutions said in a letter to the joint committee last week. He pointed out that on 14 August there was a meeting between the counsel...

Member
Lord Goldsmith (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 c1060
House
House of Lords

I entirely agree with my noble and learned friend. The test remained the statutory test: was China, beyond reasonable doubt on the criminal standard, an enemy between 2021 and 2023? The immediate difficulties will be obvious if I tell the House what the official position of the Government was during...

Member
Lord Hermer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
849 cc1060-1
House
House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
27 October 2025
Reference
HC 1414 2024-26
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Date
24 October 2025
Reference
HC 1414 2024-26
House
House of Commons; House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Home Affairs Committee; Foreign Affairs Committee; Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy; Justice Committee
Date
24 October 2025
Reference
HC 1414 2024-26
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Urgent question on the role of the Attorney General's Office in the decision to drop the China spy prosecution.

Lead member
Robert Jenrick
Answering member
Ellie Reeves
Department
Solicitor General
Type
Urgent questions
Date
23 October 2025
Reference
773 cc1102-1110
House
House of Commons

(Urgent Question): To ask the Solicitor General if she will make a statement about the role of the Attorney General’s Office in the decision to drop the China spy prosecution.

Member
Robert Jenrick (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2025
Reference
773 c1103
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for raising this urgent question, following the deeply disappointing collapse of the prosecution case concerning two individuals charged under the Official Secrets Act 1911.

It is a bedrock constitutional principle that prosecutions in this country are free from political influence. This means that it is...

Member
Ellie Reeves (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2025
Reference
773 c1103
House
House of Commons

Let me cut to the chase. It is standard practice for the CPS to inform the Attorney General if a case of political significance that had required Attorney General consent in the first place is likely to be dropped. We are told that the Attorney General was informed that this...

Member
Robert Jenrick (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2025
Reference
773 c1104
House
House of Commons

Today we have heard from the shadow Justice Secretary yet more of the baseless smears that have characterised the Conservative party’s approach to a matter of such importance to this House and the whole nation. He knows that the Attorney General will give evidence next week—as soon as Tuesday—to the...

Member
Ellie Reeves (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2025
Reference
773 cc1104-5
House
House of Commons